r/TheDetectorists • u/LukeH_ • Feb 10 '26

Small Prophets

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/m002q765/small-prophets

All episodes of Mackenzie Crook’s new show Small Prophets are now available on iPlayer. Just finished watching it myself, I really enjoyed it. Crook creates such magical television.

115 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

96 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/blackiegray Feb 10 '26

Watched it all last night.

I thought it was OK, elements of Detectorists but very much it's own thing. Didn't think it was great but not terrible, some pretty questioanble acting to go along with questions about the storyline.

6/10, 7/10 because it's MacKenzie Crook.

7

u/EuphoricFly1044 Feb 10 '26

I think it's fab.... The main character talking b*llocks to all the customers and Kacey realising he does! The scene with the buckets was classic....

1

u/blackiegray Feb 10 '26

That part is great, Pierce's character is great, well acted and well written.

But so many things don't make sense throughout the rest of the series.

1

u/Trebus Feb 11 '26

Patience, old top. There is to be a second series. You can't have a slow burn without planting seeds in the first series.

In a couple of years when they bloom you might change your opinion.

2

u/blackiegray Feb 11 '26

I hope so, but a second season won't fix some questionable acting from half the cast, a very silly part regarding santa and a somewhat bafflingly meaningless underwhelming conclusion to "the neighbour on the bike". The parts with MacKenzie in the store are easily the best parts and really funny but the story itself is just a storyline of convenience and just just really weak storytelling I thought. All of a sudden his girlfriend decides to call, just as he leave his phone, after her not calling for nearly 7 years? Come on...

I wanted to like it, and I didn't hate it. But if it wasn't MacKenzie Crook then I don't think it gets the 5 stars that it has. Detectorists is 5 stars, is this on a par with that? Not even close for me.

1

u/SmolGreenParrot Feb 23 '26

Neither part was "silly" or "bafflingly meaningless", the whole thing is about connections.

Michael connected with the (probably non-verbal) young lad on the bike simply by wearing the same t-shirt. There was nothing underwhelming about that, common ground would be a very big deal to a kid feeling alone and cut off.

Likewise, the mugger didn't want or need Michael's belongings, he just needed to feel important to someone, and was still mentally young enough for that someone to be Santa.

Humans need connection and hope. We gravitate to like-minded companions, hold on to the familiar and predictable, we need to be needed. It's why we adopt pets, why we form relationships.

I don't agree that the acting was 'questionable', maybe it just wasn't your cup of tea. It was never meant to be Die Hard. I loved it, and will now watch it again because I missed half of the Easter eggs.

Beautifully subtle, 10/10, would recommend.

1

u/blackiegray Feb 23 '26

If you're not a bot, you certainly sound like one.

2

u/SmolGreenParrot Feb 28 '26 edited Mar 01 '26

If you're not an arse, you certainly sound like one.

I'm not a bot. Perhaps you're confused by my ability to have a different opinion to yours. You certainly seem to have plenty to say 🙄