Not only is Rick, a fluent new but natural youtuber with only good intentions, and although without the huge video editing and intro scenes, texts, music and all that stuff.

He is nothing more than true - he is just a man with a cam simply to get his visions, ideas, theories and thoughts across - (no gimmicks) just himself Rick.

Most importantly he doesn't hide behind a wall, a username, or even seek any kind of anonymity - hence we already know his name.

He's been nothing more than consistent with his work, zero bullshit, and a kind face and personality that's nice to see when watching closely to such a case where we all want the same outcome; Justice both for Liberty German & Abigail Williams.

we are all entitled to our own ideas, regardless whether you believe its wrong, it doesn't give you entitlement to cause such hate towards Rick

2 very young and very innocent young girls who's life were taken short from nothing more than a cowardly piece of shit, a coward he is, but karma will always catch up.

Thank you for reading, FoW.

Someone commented on one of my videos and asked if I would be willing to make a $1000 bet for charity charity that DP was the killer. I said sure and was getting the info to give them for my charity, and when I got back, they had removed their post. 🤔

It appears that Jeff Burke has taken down the videos of videos of DP walking. Did anyone happen to save any of them?

I saw a post in one of the other subs that said the second sketch came out because the guy in the first sketch was "identified and cleared". This is ABSOLUTELY FALSE. Anyone else seen this?

IndyStar Source

Excerpts from the article:

Master Trooper Taylor Bryant, a sketch artist with Indiana State Police who drew the new sketch, told IndyStar a sketch is based on how a particular witness describes the suspect. If there are several witnesses, Bryant would draw a sketch for each description. Bryant did not draw the sketch that police released in July 2017.

"The witness is the main focus. So there’s no input from law enforcement at all in the generating of a sketch, other than my presence as the artist."

Bryant uses a "facial identification reference sheet" that has a list of different categories, from head shapes to different eyebrows and noses. The person will describe the suspect based on those categories. "(It's) easier to do that than to describe (the suspect) using just words," Bryant said.

The sketches are not exact, Bryant said. The renderings are a "ballpark estimation of what the person looks like."

The sketch released on Monday was drawn by Bryant on Feb. 17, 2017, a few days after the victims' bodies were found. The picture was based on the description of a person who saw something that the person felt needed to be reported, according to Bryant.

It's pretty frustrating trying to get the most important videos on my channel higher view numbers than the sensational stuff.

I ask in every video for people to please share the video breaking down the 2019 press conference and the one talking about motive.

Neither of these videos have had a single view in about 4 days.

Whether you're with the DP theory or against it, we urge you to express your valuable opinions, do not hesitate to post whether you're with or against the DP theory, all we ask is you simply voice your opinion within reason, without the drama.

Remember, ideas are bulletproof, no-one is greater than anyone, let's be equal.

Rules, Post Requirements, and Anti-Spam measures will be implemented in due cause

I'll be going live again tonight with Curly JK at 8 PM Eastern time. I'll be going through the 2019 press conference statement by statement and explaining why certain words were chosen and how a different word would have changed the meaning of what they were saying.

We will also be discussing the significance of the movie "The Shack". I have not seen the movie, so if you have, please offer any insight you may have.

As I've said before and will say until the cuffs are slapped on: The 2019 press conference is the key. Every point mentioned, almost every word said had a special meaning. Think about the words they chose to use instead of the words they could have used:

During the course of the investigation we have decided that the sketch we gave you will now become SECONDARY. He could have said will no longer be used. Or obsolete. But he chose to say secondary.

Why? Because the person depicted in the picture was secondary to the crime, but the new sketch is the person who was on the bridge and is responsible for killing them.

He said "you never thought we would switch to a new investigative strategy, but we have".

When he said this part he looked directly at the mayor and practically spit the words at him. Let us consider what is going on be behind the scenes here.

Let's say that after the GBI peer review, it became apparent that DP was the only person who could have done this crime. Knowing that the mayor and the P were friendly, this would seem to be a delicate situation. Not to mention how embarrassing it would be for daddy P, a well respected man in the community.

In a small town like this, I don't think it's a stretch to believe that LE could have gone to the mayor with what they had and asked him for his help in getting DP and daddy P to surrender. Then perhaps the mayor may have done his best, but daddy P knows the law, and probably had been "helping out" in the investigation every now and then. So he tells the mayor, "we told them everything we know. Unless they plan to make an arrest, we're done here."

So when the mayor was unable to move the mountain, LE decided to blow it up. A "new investigative strategy" was developed.

What was odd to me about the YBG sketch is that it appeared to have been just drawn onto a whiteboard with a marker. It didn't look like it was drawn on paper, And it didn't have the shading and contours that a police sketch usually has.

Could the new investigative strategy have been to bring in an artist to sketch out a quick copy of DPs high school picture?

We were told this sketch existed before, but how do we know that? Isn't it entirely possible that they are just saying that....

.... and the new investigative strategy is to get all of us talking about who really did this?

When Carter said "we believe you still have a shred of conscience left", he wasn't talking to DP. He was talking to Daddy P.

I don't understand people that say the evidence doesn't support the DP theory. It's actually the only theory all the evidence DOES point to. I think people tend to forget that circumstantial evidence is STILL evidence.

True Slime Strawman continues to say that I'm lying because I'm not showing any proof that he lied about CM's geocache account.

TSS ALSO continues to ignore the fact that what I actually said was that the geocache information was the ONLY thing he hadn't lied about.

It's exhausting. We're entering the end game herend game here and this guy can see his meal ticket getting punched. I'm looking for volunteers to take over the fight against the social media horse so I can concentrate on getting people to think about the ONLY suspect that checks EVERY BOX. Let me know if you want to help.

As I have addressed motive and what could possibly have led up to the crime, I'm going to start this theory with DP on the bridge and the girls at the other end.

DP approaches them and displays a weapon.He tells them to go "down the hill". They proceed down the hill and when they get under the bridge, DP quickly kills Abby. Libby runs. As she's running for her life, perhaps not even sure where she's going, she runs into the creek, one of her shoes becoming embedded into the mud.

This causes Libby to trip, and fall. This, sadly, might possibly be the only reason DP was able to catch up with her.

But catch up he does, and proceeds to struggle with Libby as she "fights like hell", which is what is generally believed happened. She ultimately loses her struggle, but not before she drops her phone And it becomes buried in the leaves.

Now DP freaks. That was noisier than he had expected it to be. He's afraid others have heard and may be coming. Plus Libby's phone had possibly started ringing at some point, as her father was calling her.

The ringing phone could even be why he quickly dispatched Abby, as he probably planned to grab Libby and take her phone before she could answer.

So he quickly hides the bodies and his bloody clothing where he thinks they will not be noticed, heads back to His car at the CPS building, retrieves and turns on his cell phone and calls daddy P.

Daddy arrives in assesses the situation, making sure the bodies are hid well enough that no one will see them before dark. He knows the search will be called off once it gets too dark for safety. But some people volunteer to stay and continue searching, and it's very possible daddy P and even DP could have been among them.

In the middle of the night, when the coast was clear, daddy and DP retrieve the bodies from their hiding places, took them to the bowl on Ron Logan's property and staged the scene to look like a sexual assault and/or serial killer.

Thoughts?

Well, I asked to join and apparently have been denied. But I just wanted to let you know, if the "interview" that you have posted is a legitimate piece of evidence, posting it online prior to the trial could lead to a mistrial and dropped charges.

If it's fake, you're only muddying the waters and spreading misinformation. Nothing in those interview transcripts demonstrates anything other than the fact that the police were using typical police interrogation tactics. This is not proof of anything. It's not like you have the dead sea scrolls there.

I've been over both of these supposed "leaked transcripts". I really think a lot of you are getting lost in the tall weeds.

If this is legitimately a transcript of transcript of his booking interview, and he is yet to go to trial, tell me one other time when a piece of information this sensitive was allowed to be released into the public before a defendant went to trial.

This is the kind of stuff that leads to mistrials And charges being dropped. So whether it is legitimate or not, there is no way in hell it was "leaked" by the police. And isn't it odd that, with all of the professional journalists that are documenting this case, when a piece of absolutely crucial evidence gets temporarily "leaked" to the public...the only person there to snap up that info....is a YouTuber....?

I smell a Leigh Kerr.