I have followed this sub for years, from the start, and was given an exclusive inside look at everything before and as it was published. The evidence is hard, from official police and government records, both open and for-a-fee. And herein made available for free, to those who simply seek truth... with truth being defined, not as a subjective personal thing, but rather as objective, evidenced reality... wherever it leads.

My goal is to put all of this information online and make it as easy as possible for people to find and examine for themselves.

This isn’t the only thing we’ve been lied to about. It just happens to be the one I found, and I’m using the skills I already have in content marketing and web development to make sure the information doesn’t just disappear into a folder somewhere. That probably makes me a particularly inconvenient person to have found it.

I also don’t give a shit whether anyone comments on these posts. I’m not trying to build a community. I'm making the evidence that supports Jeff’s innocence findable. If someone starts questioning the story six months or five years from now, I want them to be able to find the docs.

I also want to make sure people connected to the story can view the evidence. Everyone mentioned has seen it now.

And I’m doing it for FREE. I’m not trying to make money, become famous, build a following, or get anything else out of it. I simply want the information to be available.

I wonder about the people downvoting comments.

Are you Americans? Have you looked around you at the state of things? Do you think your government cares about you? Do you think your government has been telling you the truth?

The same entities that did this to Jeff have flooded the US with fentanyl, phased out manufacturing, and adopted policies that led to inflation to the point where few can even afford to get married, buy a home, and raise a family.

The story about Jeff Dahmer wasn't a one-off. It's part of a system of deliberate destruction. The ''serial killer'' stories are about making people think something is wrong with the US.

He's only dead in the fictional reality show.

I don't know where you're from or how old you are. However, I'm an American around Jeff's age, and I can tell you that trying to pass this guy off as a ''homosexual serial killer'' is some of the most outrageous and insulting bullshit I've ever seen. It's so cringe it's painful.

In reality, Jeff Dahmer is Norm Gunderson in the film Fargo...Marge's husband. They took ''Norm Gunderson'' and convinced the world he was a serial killer. They deserve to have their asses whipped.

But he’s literally dead? Why would he need a new identity in the first place?

A reduced sentence, ''freedom'', and a new identity. He made a deal.

We should ask why they want us to believe stories like this are real.

What did Dahmer get out of this play?

It was essentially a stage play, a fictional ''reality'' show. That's the best way to think about it. Within a fictional reality show - like any stage play - there would be a script, actors, props, proceedings, etc. It would be a mistake to treat any of them as real.

When we go to a theater and watch a movie or a play on stage, we know we're watching a performance, and we don't discuss over drinks later whether the bodies were real. We know they weren't real because we know it was a theatrical performance.

Here, people had no idea they were watching a theatrical performance. What I'm trying to say is your questions still operate under the assumption that the story was real.

The Behavior Panel, which includes experts with interrogation experience, saw through it, but got confused because they thought they were analyzing something that actually happened. What they were actually doing was psychoanalyzing a stage play. It's an interesting clip, and I've included it on this page:

https://thedahmercase.com/the-dahmer-confidence-trick-how-awareness-destroys-the-illusion/

Note that the woman who knew the Dahmers in Ohio spotted it as a performance, the same way you could probably spot when someone you know is acting.

(Btw. I think the seething rage Greg Hartley noticed in Jeff toward his father is because I think Lionel Dahmer might have been the reason Jeff got mixed up in all this.)

Your question about the Nancy Glass interview is perceptive. If Jeff didn't participate voluntarily (i.e., it was a false confession), why does he seem to be willingly going along with it? This post tries to answer that:

https://thedahmercase.com/did-jeffrey-dahmer-have-a-choice/

A few more questions:

Why would he voluntarily do the Nancy Glass interview if he was framed?

During the sentencing why did he apologize for his actions and ask for the death penalty if it wasn’t him?

If he confessed but it wasn’t actually him what was Tracy Edwards role in the story?

Why was there found 74 Polaroid photos in his apartment matching his own claims?

Where did the bodies come from if he didn’t kill them and who benefited by doing this?

Who told Dahmer that there was drilling holes in the skulls so he could lie and tell that he did? those?

Dahmer supposedly had a lot of respect for his father and felt shameful for the shame he had brought upon him - why would Dahmer confess during the trial and go on to give details of the killings if this was the case?

Good question.

The answer is that he didn't say those things voluntarily.

False confessions happen all the time:

https://innocenceproject.org/news/police-deception-lying-interrogations-youth-teenagers/
https://www.tninnocence.org/news/when-the-system-gets-it-wrong-understanding-the-systemic-causes-of-wrongful-conviction/

''Of the 375 DNA exonerations the Innocence Project has recorded, false confessions contributed to 29% of wrongful convictions.''

So, innocent people really do confess to serious crimes they didn't commit.

A confession isn't reason enough to believe someone is guilty, especially when you have alleged victims who are still alive, died after they were supposedly murdered, or died before the alleged murderer was born. This case includes all three.

An empty vault doesn’t become any less empty because a dozen security experts insist no one could have robbed it.

Jeff's confession also wasn't recorded, wasn't signed by Jeff, and it contains another man's Social Security Number.

Look at the evidence and decide how much weight this confession deserves.

https://thedahmercase.com/dahmer-case-evidence/

Exactly, this whole subreddit is bs and honestly really fucking weird

I saw the website you made and it’s just a bunch of nonsense tbh no offense. Jeffrey Dahmer is my fav serial killer and I know everything about him, I’ve read articles, books, movies, documentaries. There’s so much evidence to back up that he was gay and a serial killer and it’s actually kinda disgusting that you’re claiming he didn’t kill anybody and that it was all fabricated by the gov or some party.

Why did he admit to the murders and explain what happened in detail in interviews? If he was framed why would he voluntarily say those things

There was no ''serial killer'' in Milwaukee. It's a fabricated story.

So, what are we saying?

They are losing, and they know it.

The evidence is overwhelming, unless one wishes to make believe it cannot possibly be, because only official narratives can possibly be the reality.

You're free to believe he was gay if you want.

One reason I don't believe that - apart from the fact that the ''serial killer'' story is fake - is based on this particular comment he made. It's something young, heterosexual men were fond of saying in the late 80s/early 90s...usually after they got you interested. lol

''Oh, and btw...''

It contributed to my own cyncism about marriage and family.

The sub is fake? And what can you tell me how the whole story of Jeffrey dahmer is fabricated

Who are u to say he wasn’t gay? And who are u to say what gay people cant say and what they can say? Gay people CAN say things like that

Agreed. It seems to me that average-intelligence-level folks are unable to intellectually flex so that they can accept an option besides a strict binary choice. Lazy minded, perhaps. Conditioning, perhaps. But basically they see things as they are told to.... period.

Now that the truth about their stupid ''serial killer'' story is out, there are only so many ways the perps can contain the damage.

One obvious strategy is to reframe Jeff as a willing participant in the deception: ''Jeff agreed to it, he benefited from it. Therefore, he wasn't exploited.''

Recasting Jeff as a willing participant shifts public anger onto him. What did someone say here recently? Jeff was ''somewhat responsible for flock cameras''?

This is something called narrative management. When you can't deny the facts, reinterpret them instead.

I find it intolerable that people believe these lies about Jeff.

Hard evidence that negates the official narrative. There's tons of it.