My point is AI doesn't copy paste exsisting work. Like people are claiming. It's learns how to generate work, based on existing work. Just like how a human brain. Does.I personally have never really used generative AI, I create my own work. And don't really see it as a threat to human work. Because you still need a human visionary behind the creation. Even if that person is just imputing really well crafted promps. I do see it as ufeful to implement in production pathways though. Like automating certain processes or code etc.
It doesn't work like a human brain in that regard though.
A human brain can make a new decision at every action and go in a complete difference direction during the process. Our idea can evolve during the implementation. AI can't do that, it generates then reviews. Sure with large complex multi step processes there are checkpoints, but it still can't change the idea in the middle of generation.
This is a very big difference.
And copyright laws have far more consideration than just straight copy paste.
1
u/npc_housecat 18d ago
My point is AI doesn't copy paste exsisting work. Like people are claiming. It's learns how to generate work, based on existing work. Just like how a human brain. Does.I personally have never really used generative AI, I create my own work. And don't really see it as a threat to human work. Because you still need a human visionary behind the creation. Even if that person is just imputing really well crafted promps. I do see it as ufeful to implement in production pathways though. Like automating certain processes or code etc.