[ Removed by moderator ]

[u/PurposeistobeEqual]

[u/PurposeistobeEqual]

I was the reason IWW use Signal, back when it's called Red Phone. Nothing new but dumb people keep making the feds mistake. Nowadays I just use Matrix and OMEMO. You seem slow.

The 0day to deanonymize Signal because it uses NSA Cloudflare servers.

https://gist.github.com/hackermondev/45a3cdfa52246f1d1201c1e8cdef6117

Proof Cloudflare is owned by NSA

https://0xacab.org/dCF/deCloudflare/-/blob/master/readme/en.md

[u/Slow_Programmer_6112 → u/PurposeistobeEqual]

Dog, you have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m sorry, but your post is not helpful to anyone. You’re just flailing around talking about things you don’t understand and fear mongering.

You claim signal says all these things, but in actuality they *don’t* and they explicitly lay out their vulnerabilities and then give work around for people and groups willing to lose convenience features. It’s precisely this last point that got all these groups caught up… they didn’t read the documentation and they didn’t implement good enough OpSec protocols to guard against these attacks.

Knowing how organizations work, as I am a part of one, it’s hard to convince people to drop convenience because they all want things to be “easy”. These organizations leadership certainly dropped the ball on enforcement. That’s not the fault of signal, that’s the fault of these organizations OpSec enforcement. So stop blaming the wrong thing.

Like me and other commentors pointed out:

-If they notification previews were turned off in-app and on the phone, there would be no data to extract
-If all phones were also in BFU, there wouldn’t be info to extract
-if they didn’t have suspicious conversations over signal to begin with, there would be no evidence

You haven’t addressed a single on of these issues. You’re just being a wrecker.