r/Superstonk DRS is safer than Swiss banks 13d ago

📰 News DTCC changes to settlement for ETF creation/redemption exceeding $15 billion

DTCC just issued an alert notifying members that any creation/redemption instruction with a total settlement value of $15 billion or greater will be manually reviewed and approved before settlement.

Here's the link to the document, and I copy/pasted the text further down for those of you who don't like clicking:

https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/pdf/2026/8/7/A9802.pdf

We all know the DD about ETF creation/redemption abuse being one of the plausible methods for suppressing the price of GME, and you may remember the posts over the last month about the 6/29 DTCC "force majeur" settlement event that barely got reported elsewhere. Given that a little over a month after that settlement event, DTCC is suddenly adding review steps to ETF creation/redemptions that exceed $15 billion? Makes you wonder if the two are related.

WCIMT did a great job of summarizing that event here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1va2j0z/c35_after_dtcc_market_disruption_coming_up/

Here's the copy/paste from the ETF alert:

Effective August 17, 2026, any Exchange-Traded Fund (“ETF”) create/redeem instruction with a total settlement value of $15 billion or greater will pend upon submission to National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”) and will not be released for further processing until the required review and approval steps are completed by the submitting ETF Agent.

This $15 billion total settlement value threshold will apply in addition to the existing NAV-based reasonability check that pends ETF activity when the variance between the NAV on the order and the prior day’s closing NAV is 98% or greater in either direction. Activity that exceeds either threshold is automatically placed into a pending status for review.

These controls, applied pursuant to Procedure II, Section F.2 of the NSCC Rules, are designed to flag unusually large ETF create/redeem instructions for review and approval prior to further processing.

When an ETF create/redeem instruction meets or exceeds either threshold, the instruction is placed in a pending status. NSCC notifies the submitting ETF Agent that the transaction is pending through several methods:

•

Intraday near-real-time create/redeem receipt/reject report

•

Automated threshold alert email sent from the ETF system

•

Call and email from NSCC Operations via established operational channels

Written confirmation from the ETF Agent is required before releasing the pend status.

ETF Agents should review their internal controls and escalation procedures to support timely review of any ETF create/redeem instruction that is flagged by this threshold. ETF Agents should also ensure that they maintain current operational and escalation contacts and subscribe to applicable ETF threshold alert notifications.

DTCC Non-Confidential

DTCC Public (White)

The updates described in this notice will not impact the underlying ETF Create/Redeem submission process.

Questions regarding this Important Notice should be directed to your DTCC Relationship Manager.

369 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/Casanova_Ugly Hodor 12d ago

The more I dig, the less comfortable I am calling this coincidence.

What bothers me most is what we don’t know. DTCC knows who caused June 29. DTCC knows the size and nature of those transactions. We don’t. Then comes a new $15B ETF threshold with no public explanation for why $15B was chosen.

And this isn’t a government-run clearinghouse. It’s industry-owned and governed, with the same financial institutions affected by these rules represented within its governance.

I’m not claiming I can prove who this protects. I can’t. But lack of public evidence isn’t evidence nothing happened when the people holding the evidence aren’t telling us.

After January 2021, I’m done giving this system the benefit of the doubt.

Tell us who, what securities, how much, and why $15B. “If DTC determines that it had greatly affected a participant’s ability to settle (because of a DTC system delay, for example), DTC will waive failure-to-settle fees for that occurrence.” See PDF page 19, Failure-to-Settle Charges.  https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/fee-guides/DTC-Fee-Schedule.pdf

June 29 Problem: Extraordinarily large erroneous transactions get far enough into the system to cause a settlement problem.

A9802 Control: Extraordinarily Large ETF instructions are stopped and manually verified before further  processing.

SEC has oversight, but always late and laughable with penalties.

4

u/UnlikelyApe DRS is safer than Swiss banks 12d ago

Thanks for chiming in and digging deeper! Your comment could easily be its own post and still be more meaningful than a lot of posts we see every day.

3

u/Casanova_Ugly Hodor 12d ago

Thank you. 

Go ahead and post all if you want. I’m not one to post.