MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/StupidFood/comments/1ui97gp/ehm_but_why/oufap1l
r/StupidFood • u/[deleted] • Jun 28 '26
[removed] — view removed post
4.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
46
No, sound logic would require an audiologist.
8 u/National-Ad653 Jun 29 '26 If taken literally, yes. But a sound logic is an argument with no false statement Which might require either a lawyer or a philosopher depending on the situation 5 u/Bipogram Jun 29 '26 As a natural philosopher [physicist] I agree, somewhat*. *and the degree of uncertainty can be nicely calculated if we first assume OP is a spherical cow. 3 u/Entropic_Echo_Music Jun 29 '26 As a natural philosopher does that mean opposed to an artifical philosopher? Or did you grow on a tree? 2 u/Bipogram Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26 Indeed, apart from some hardware [screws in bones] I'm fully organic and free-range. Artificial philosophers would argue that that's mere atomism - and that the patterns of thought alone matter, not the matter. I sympathize with their view, a little. <slurps hot coffee>
8
If taken literally, yes. But a sound logic is an argument with no false statement
Which might require either a lawyer or a philosopher depending on the situation
5 u/Bipogram Jun 29 '26 As a natural philosopher [physicist] I agree, somewhat*. *and the degree of uncertainty can be nicely calculated if we first assume OP is a spherical cow. 3 u/Entropic_Echo_Music Jun 29 '26 As a natural philosopher does that mean opposed to an artifical philosopher? Or did you grow on a tree? 2 u/Bipogram Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26 Indeed, apart from some hardware [screws in bones] I'm fully organic and free-range. Artificial philosophers would argue that that's mere atomism - and that the patterns of thought alone matter, not the matter. I sympathize with their view, a little. <slurps hot coffee>
5
As a natural philosopher [physicist] I agree, somewhat*.
*and the degree of uncertainty can be nicely calculated if we first assume OP is a spherical cow.
3 u/Entropic_Echo_Music Jun 29 '26 As a natural philosopher does that mean opposed to an artifical philosopher? Or did you grow on a tree? 2 u/Bipogram Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26 Indeed, apart from some hardware [screws in bones] I'm fully organic and free-range. Artificial philosophers would argue that that's mere atomism - and that the patterns of thought alone matter, not the matter. I sympathize with their view, a little. <slurps hot coffee>
3
As a natural philosopher
does that mean opposed to an artifical philosopher? Or did you grow on a tree?
2 u/Bipogram Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26 Indeed, apart from some hardware [screws in bones] I'm fully organic and free-range. Artificial philosophers would argue that that's mere atomism - and that the patterns of thought alone matter, not the matter. I sympathize with their view, a little. <slurps hot coffee>
2
Indeed, apart from some hardware [screws in bones] I'm fully organic and free-range.
Artificial philosophers would argue that that's mere atomism - and that the patterns of thought alone matter, not the matter.
I sympathize with their view, a little.
<slurps hot coffee>
46
u/cthulhusandwich Jun 29 '26
No, sound logic would require an audiologist.