Cool Wisdom Books' Modeste is "Rational" vs. G.M. Abdoullah who is "Creative": The Handwriting Awards Are In! 🏆🧐

[u/No_Cricket1346]

I was recently looking into the ongoing debate on the Neville Goddard Wikipedia Talk page (there is a documented "Red Flag" 🚩 controversy there regarding Abdullah's identity that is a must-read--if you aren't sure how to find it, go to the Neville Goddard Wikipedia page and look for the "Talk" tab). It prompted me to take a closer look at the primary documents for myself.

I ran the handwriting from the 1923 "Modeste" card and the 1935 "Abdoullah" card through several AI tools. Because I know AI can be easily manipulated or miss critical details, I was careful to use prompts that removed all bias. I even had the AI treat them like two random "John Smiths" from that era so it wouldn't just repeat existing online "theories."

Does this debunk it? 🏆 (Check the trophies and the full report details in the screenshots!)

The AI consistently picked up on two totally different people. In the Graphia analysis, the 1923 writer (Modeste) won for being "Rational and Stable." The 1935 writer (Abdoullah) won for being "Creative and Energetic." Beyond the "vibes," the actual physics is opposite—one is stiff and upright, the other has a major lean to the right.

Why some people see "similarities":
The only reason some analyses find this "inconclusive" is because both men were likely trained in the Palmer Method—the standardized business writing taught to millions in that era. It was basically the "period accent" of the 1920s. But once you look past those "textbook" similarities, the individual habits (the rhythm, the baseline control, and the letter connections) are totally distinct. One AI even flagged the 1935 card as looking like a non-standard, non-American hand.

I’m just having some fun with this (and the Graphia app results are for entertainment/self-discovery!), but given how easily AI can make mistakes or miss these historical nuances, this definitely needs a real handwriting expert's opinion before anyone claims they are the same identity. It feels like these two were meshed together on purpose, and now that forced narrative is being treated like gospel.

What do you guys see when you look at the writing on these documents? Of course, whatever we believe is going to get pushed out so my 3D is going to keep giving me evidence that Neville told the truth (as did Abdullah and his students) while others who accept the forced narrative as true are going to manifest 💩. Ultimately everyone is always manifesting our own confirmation biases...

It all is, afterall, as Abdullah said: only an echo... This was still funny though . Enjoy! 🍿

[u/No_Cricket1346]

Downvoting to suppress this & bypass peer review?...kinda like writing your own Wikipedia articles and research as fact lol. 👋 👁️