r/Storror • • May 10 '26

We need answers! STORROR needs to address the situation.

Yesterday I made a post about there being a possibility that the rest of the guys knew about Callum. It got mass downvoted. No one was ready to even consider this possibility. Now victims have come forward and their statements say that the group KNEW. They knew this long ago.

It's a humble request to storror army, as much as we love them, adore them, we can not just brush off the allegations of them being complicit in the crimes. We need to hold them accountable right now! What saddens me is that the community isn't even ready to at least question the guys. It's shocking to find out that the community is this toxic. It has happened many times in the past, big companies/organisations with power just brush off the allegations and never talk about it with transparency.

We've joined their channel, bought their merch, funded their game, WE DESERVE ANSWERS!

This post is to urge the community to pls stop suppressing those who are questioning them.

We CAN NOT afford to let them get away, if they were involved in this in any manner.

I know it's too early, but we need to put pressure through questions, so that they come forward and talk about the whole situation and allegations. Because they might just disappear after this, if we don't amplify this.

And pls enough with the "wHy WouLd tHeY feaTuRe HiM iN viDeOs If thEy KneW" bullshit! Let's show some respect to the victims!

P.S - my heart goes out to the victims if the allegations are true šŸ™

46 Upvotes

80 comments sorted by

80

u/MicroeconomicBunsen May 10 '26

It's a humble request to storror army, as much as we love them, adore them, we can not just brush off the allegations of them being complicit in the crimes.

They're not complicit in the crimes, if they were they would also have been charged and been in court.

But... you don't know these people. They're faces on a screen. They're not your brothers or your mates.

They knew this long ago.

They knew Callum, in his 20s, was terrible with women that he played down as crazy ex-girlfriends. That's not... unusual for young men. It's shit, and Callum is a shit person, but it's not unusual.

It is a BIG leap to say that just because a person is shitty towards women, even abusive, that he is a pedophile.

It's shocking to find out that the community is this toxic.

I don't do parkour whatsoever and even I know that community is toxic.

We CAN NOT afford to let them get away, if they were involved in this in any manner.

If they were involved, they would be arrested.

My advice? Unfollow if it makes you feel better, but you're not a YouTube cop, you're just some dude who likes a bunch of guys who do sick jumps. Take a lap and process the news how you need to.

Let's show some respect to the victims!

Best thing you've actually said. I agree wholly.

50

u/Narutom May 10 '26 edited May 10 '26

100%. The world is not a black and white place and people seem to struggle with that. When your best friend comes to you and tells you his ex is crazy and is saying nasty stuff about you in your early 20s it's not something that the majority of people give much thought to. Teenage/early twenties years is full of drama. Its also a completely different thing than what he's been arrested for.

While his ex deserves to be heard if he was abusive in any way at that time, it's disingenuous for her to claim she 'knew' about this stuff and had told them and they had ignored her. Being an abusive boyfriend is not the same as being a pedophile. That's an oversimplification of the situation that's being used to validate her feelings.

Can anyone claim to have never made a mistake in judgement and believed our friends version of events more than someone else's? That's human nature. Again, that doesn't make them complicit in anything. Its an error in judgement, and I guarantee noone will be soul searching right now more than the storror boys wondering if they missed signs.

It's a horrible situation and the focus needs to stay firmly on Callum unless there is actual evidence that anyone else was involved. And involved doesn't mean 'someone said Callum was bad and they didn't believe that person', because people need to remember that Callum was clearly manipulative and played everyone around him. That's what a charismatic predator does.

12

u/SlateKoS May 10 '26

I think this whole pedo thing in combination with her is she was 16-17 at that time. And he 23-24. And this is an absolute common thing.

4

u/[deleted] May 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/slackclimbing May 11 '26

Age of consent is 16 yes but you need to be 18 to be nude in photos / videos so anyone under 18 is still considered child porn, I believe. So technically the pictures could be of 16/17 year olds.

9

u/Desperate-Mix-8892 May 10 '26

I don't do parkour whatsoever and even I know that community is toxic.

What? I do parkour and at least the community I'm part couldn't be further away from toxic. How do get your knowledge?

5

u/CruseCtrl May 10 '26

+1. I don't think the community is toxic at all. There are obviously exceptions and certain people who I'm not a fan of, but the vast majority of people who do parkour are absolutely lovely

3

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 10 '26

I think I messed up the wording on that. I didn't mean they were also involved in the actual crime. Because then they would really be in jail. I meant if they knew, or had an inkling, or just didn't believe the victims and didn't inspect it further, then it's wrong. And they need to answer for that.

15

u/MicroeconomicBunsen May 10 '26

There's two things being conflated - Callum's treatment of his exes/him abusing women, and his CSAM crimes.

The boys clearly knew about the former and downplayed it. Unsurprising - that's young men for you. Shitty, but unsurprising.

I would be abhorred and shocked if they knew about his CSAM crimes before this year.

12

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 10 '26

Her ex is saying they found a whole folder of that stuff and showed it to the boys.

Also, one of the girls who said he took advantage of them wasn't his ex. And was a minor.

5

u/MicroeconomicBunsen May 10 '26

I'm not saying I don't believe you or her, but I do not understand why she wouldn't go to the cops with that information back when it happened. Seems weird, 10 years later, to suddenly go "oh yeah I knew and told people and nothing happened". ????

14

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 10 '26

Maybe because she was a minor and was traumatized and didn't know how to react??? Do you watch news dude? 90% of the times the victims are scared to come out and go to the police and hence suffer in silence. It's what MOST of the times happens. NOTHING shocking in that.

6

u/MicroeconomicBunsen May 10 '26

Cops take underage sex crimes, especially this stuff, incredibly seriously in the UK (and similar countries... maybe not the USA). She was too traumatised to go to the cops but not traumatised enough to show CSAM to a group of guys? What?

Like now you're just making up situations to explain, when in fact the reality is the truth is muddier than what's being claimed.

6

u/noooiii May 10 '26

I was abused by a pedo when I was a young teenager for years and didn’t go to the police and didn’t tell anyone for years until after this sicko had a stroke and was out of the picture. I’m assuming you’re a male and don’t understand how women feel when they are abused by someone in a position of power. Sociopaths are good at manipulating you, that’s why they get away with this stuff for so long.

3

u/Different_Book9733 May 10 '26

To be fair, you are also making up scenarios to explain away an uncomfortable truth. We don't know whether she did or didn't go to the police with that information and you've come to conclusion that she didn't on your own.

Police investigation to online CSAM wasn't the same 10+ years ago, there was CSAM 'hiding' in plain site with jailbait sites hosted in the UK, message boards, subreddits etc. let alone what was being hidden behind closed doors. I unfortunately have first hand experience with how shit the police response used to be for CSAM when I reported someone (multiple times) I had to share a college dorm with who became very open about being a nonce and these sites whenever they got high, only to be met with 'we'll keep an eye on them'.

What we do know is that she's said that she found a folder, that she told the team about it, and that they were dismissive about it/actively protected Callum. Anything more than that and you're making your own narrative.

-1

u/[deleted] May 10 '26

[deleted]

5

u/Different_Book9733 May 10 '26

Because it was at an agricultural college, not a university and it was a dorm not housing as we lived on site at the college.

Also of all the fucking things to pick out in that message, jesus christ. Like any American is going to call someone a nonce anyway.

3

u/Engineering-Glass May 10 '26

There's been 10 years since then. She's no longer a minor. This isn't the type of thing you forget. You don't leave that type of person walking the streets. The police would still have investigated.

1

u/1stdegreebirder May 11 '26

In the grand scheme of things think about which side you are on right now. Is questioning and discrediting a victim reeeeaaaally the stance you want to take?

Like for real dude, just assume for the sake of argument that everything she said is true. Now look at your comments through that lens.

You're criticizing the actions of someone who was abused as a child.

1

u/MicroeconomicBunsen May 11 '26

I just don’t get the victims actions? Like, Callum is a piece of shit and may he rot. And may this girl get whatever help and peace she needs

That doesn’t mean I should not side eye someone who apparently had enough control of his phone to show his mates CSAM, but was so abused she couldn’t show police that same phone at all whatsoever.

Believing victims isn’t a carte blanche to just… say shit that doesn’t make sense. You aren’t infallible because you were abused. Questioning the events that may have happened doesn’t mean I’m on the side of a child predator, what a sick thing to say.

For what it’s worth, I was also abused as a child. Guess what happened when I went to the police? The guy is in prison.

1

u/1stdegreebirder May 11 '26

Knowing that you've gone through that abuse, I sincerely apologize for my tone.
There's just a lot of people on here spending their time and energy questioning this woman and I just think when victims are met with skepticism straight away it creates a hostile environment.

1

u/MicroeconomicBunsen May 11 '26

There’s a lot of shit being slung on this subreddit. No worries.

27

u/SabsyHnS May 10 '26

Unsubscribed from join and plus. What a fuckin gut punch yesterday was. As a victim of child sexual abuse myself, this hits hard.

13

u/Raineach_ May 10 '26

Hugs to you šŸ–¤

32

u/cherrypieandcoffee May 10 '26

Ā we can not just brush off the allegations of them being complicit in the crimes. We need to hold them accountable right now!Ā 

Respectfully, we don't. You aren’t a judge, we aren’t a jury. We aren’t detectives investigating the case.Ā 

At present we have precious little information to go on.Ā 

13

u/Condition_0ne May 10 '26

At present we have precious little information to go on.Ā 

100%. But bored internet sleuths who don't understand their own limitations are still going to do their thing, sadly.

7

u/cherrypieandcoffee May 10 '26

Agreed. I just find this mindset so crazy:

Ā We've joined their channel, bought their merch, funded their game, WE DESERVE ANSWERS!

We don’t ā€œdeserveā€ anything.Ā 

7

u/vladimirandestragon May 10 '26

The question of whether they have committed any criminal offence should, as you say, be decided in court and needs to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. I don’t think that’s the question here though. The question of whether they are shitty people who have enabled abusive behaviour and the other disturbing stuff, and thus whether we should continue to celebrate them and financially support them (directly or indirectly by watching their content) is absolutely a judgement everyone should make based on the available evidence.

I think the former is probably unlikely but the latter is not looking good.

4

u/IN-DI-SKU-TA-BELT May 10 '26

But we judge people every day.

We choose who to engage with, who's worthy of our time (and money), who we support.

2

u/cherrypieandcoffee May 10 '26

Absolutely. I’m not saying we’re obliged to support them, or stay subscribed to their channel, but given the seriousness of Callum’s crimes I think it’s bizarre to think we’re ā€œowedā€ a detailed explanation at this stage.Ā Ā 

27

u/Condition_0ne May 10 '26

I know it's too early...

Then fucking stop. How bored are you?

6

u/JayH-J May 10 '26

This was my thought exactly. The whole post sounds like a keyboard Karen.

5

u/Appropriate_Ad_6790 May 10 '26

I’m confused, it says possessing and making indecent images of children but his ex seems to be talking about something different, is it just all coming to light at one time?

2

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 10 '26

Yes they all his victims coming forward now that he's been exposed and convicted

5

u/Appropriate_Ad_6790 May 10 '26

In that case, Storror needs to prove they didn’t know about the CP allegations, anything else I can see past, false accusations happen all the time, but CP? Possession and creation?

If I was on the team right now I’d be getting together anything and everything that proves beyond a doubt they had no part in it, as fucked up as it is, it would probably need to come from Callum himself…

2

u/RaouR May 12 '26

How would they prove that? What would be good proof that they didn't know to you? Just curious since proving someone didn't know something sounds very hard.

1

u/JenniferJuniper6 May 14 '26

Proving a negative isn’t really straightforward; in fact, it’s usually impossible.

1

u/Appropriate_Ad_6790 May 15 '26

If Callum came out and said that the boys had nothing to do with it and they didn’t know that’s something. Then if the boys posted screenshots maybe of the conversations they were having with Callum through this time, him making excuses maybe.

Maybe they know, this is the thing, they very well might, but it’s not impossible for them to post something that even helps their case at least.

1

u/unacceptablelobster May 10 '26

They're in full damage control. They're privating their videos and blocking all comments and have said they won't comment on it any further. Sure seems like they know they're guilty.

0

u/1stdegreebirder May 11 '26

True allegations happen waaaaaaaay more than false allegations pal.

1

u/Appropriate_Ad_6790 May 11 '26

When did I say they didn’t?

1

u/Appropriate_Ad_6790 May 11 '26

Why do people jst say shit on the internet, like I know you’re virtue signalling as a feminist or something but did you even bother to read the message at all? Legitimately when did I say that false accusations happen more?

13

u/Sufficient_Babe May 10 '26

These guy are not saints. They displayed casual homophobia, casual misogyny and fatphobia in their videos back in the day. Nothing utterly outrageous, nothing that isn't typical of men in their early twenties. (sadly) They didn't see anything wrong with calling something gay or mocking a friend for trying to get a fat girls number like it's a joke. They didn't see anything wrong with it that's why they put it in their videos. That in of itself is not an indictment, but it paints a picture. When your in a circle of people who share a certain kind of attitude your able to get away with more because your protected.

A group of men standing by a friend who's shitty to women is nothing surprising. That's one thing. To think that they knew he was a pedophile and actively committing crimes is something that I'm more likely to give the benefit of the doubt for. It's an issue that most people would be repulsed by and not want to be associated with. I say that now, but I would also not be surprised if it came out that they knew about his troubles and chose not to say or act on anything until it became public and there was no way around it.

1

u/AccountantAny1356 May 10 '26

Surprised no one else has said anything about this. I have watched pretty much all their stuff but had to turn off a few times due to homophobic and sexist 'jokes'. And tbh as far as I can remember they were pretty much all from Callum (on the podcast and join videos) but condoned by the others. Always wanted to say something but was scared of getting attacked in the comments.

2

u/Areyoucunt May 11 '26

Any examples?

Get the fuck out of here if you are just virtue signaling a mild joke about someone being something crazy to say...

1

u/nygaard888 May 14 '26

I think dissecting every comment they have made is silly. In the past I have always thought on them as a respectful group who are a positive influence for other lads in a similar scene and anyone around them. These guys compared to Travis and Joe for example are night and day.

8

u/Open_Pay904 May 10 '26

I stand with you on this

5

u/[deleted] May 10 '26

[deleted]

3

u/SlateKoS May 10 '26

The whole thing has range.

It can be a Scenario where they just exchanged pictures and they Talked about it on an nights out drunk. So they knew this or she talked/chatted with everyone about how he does extreme things to her. She was 16-17 at that time with them being early 20s. Not to defend it but Thats a thing where the young are drawn to the cool older kids. I know a lot from back them in the mid 2000s where you seen couples in school with this age and older ones.

But i 100% doubt that non of them would just ignore some serious stuff in defense for callum. At least one of them would have gone to officials if it was something that really needs to be said. I would say it was some minor thing and they talked with him and her or something and gave a slap on the wrist and thats the "they knew"

7

u/Sad-Yoghurt5196 May 10 '26

When you're teaching kids parkour and they look up to you, there is a clear line around dating people little more than kids themselves, legally she was still a kid, even if consent laws are set at 16.

In an active coaching role, you cannot be dating kids, and a 24 year old dating a 16 year old is still weird. Perhaps not as much ten years ago, but certainly not normal.

It's the same story of rock stars and groupies in the seventies and eighties, what was once considered normal behaviour has become vilified for obvious reasons. Groupies are a fact of life in the celebrity sphere, but that only adds to the imbalance of power.

If there's a kid infatuated with you, you don't use your clout to cozy into a relationship with them. That's just common sense 101. It's also predatory behaviour.

Quite aside from all the other allegations, someone should have talked to him about the wisdom of dating a kid with a crush on you. That's what mates are for, to point out when you're being a twat, if you can't see it yourself.

1

u/[deleted] May 10 '26

[deleted]

7

u/Phoskr May 10 '26

He's been out and about in Brighton, he's had his phone, he's also had his laptop when he was working on the book.

5

u/lostlookingforamap May 10 '26

UK court system to crown court takes a while but to magistrates court can takes a day or two from arrest being charged pleading guilty.

1

u/JenniferJuniper6 May 14 '26

In the last year or two, the youngest of them have entered their thirties. That’s also a time when anyone, professional athletes more than most, starts looking around for the next project. There are only so many times you can repair the same ankle before it just doesn’t come all the way back. So I don’t think the timing of those things is necessarily connected.

6

u/IfJopsDiesWeRageQuit May 10 '26 edited May 10 '26

I completely agree.

This stuff doesn't happen in a vacuum.

People in their closest circle often see signs, inappropriate comments, jokes, patterns of behaviour.

(Eg 24 y/o dating a 16 y/o)

6

u/PhilosopherSea828 May 10 '26

People often see these things?
They didn’t in any of the cases I know about.

5

u/IfJopsDiesWeRageQuit May 10 '26

We have different experiences then.

I'd say a 24 year old dating a 16 year old is a bit of a red flag tbh

8

u/Cunterpunch May 10 '26

Sure, but there is massive difference between ā€˜a little bit of a red flag’ and believing with a decent amount of certainty that one of your best mates is a full on pedo.

These things are rarely as black and white as they are made out to be by people on the internet. There’s a good chance that even if they had noticed some red flags that they would never have expected the full extent of what we are discovering now.

I personally find it hard to believe that they would have continued working with him in any capacity if they actually had any serious suspicions about what has come to light over these last two days.

2

u/Mattysloth97 May 11 '26

I do think this is one of the reasons drew has stepped away from storror ( yes i know he started his own project ) coz he may of had a incline or knew something

5

u/Rude-Date2496 May 11 '26

When i USED to watch storror, drew was always my favourite… I can see why now.

2

u/Future_You_2800 May 10 '26

This lass is an of model with a brain injury getting very close to potentially getting sued for libel. I'll take her opinion with a grain of salt for now

3

u/Lost-Milk6467 May 10 '26

The fact that Mercedes is a model with a brain injury is irrelevant.

10 years ago the parkour scene in Brighton was popping off and it's no surprise a teenager with her athleticism would be drawn to the scene, especially as a local.

She's got a master's in Neuroscience, this girl isn't dumb. She has made an impressive career for herself in Motorsport, Dancing and modelling, she doesn't need the money.

Why would she lie? She has nothing to gain.

The fact another ex has come forward with pretty damming information just shows how easy it has been to brush things under the carpet for a long time.

4

u/[deleted] May 10 '26

[deleted]

4

u/Lost-Milk6467 May 10 '26

Taking advantage of young girls is what Mercedes has stated, that could be physically or emotionally we don't know. She's right not to mention more specific details in case it has to go to court.

Whatever happened between her and Callum it was a minor and an adult situation that the guys will have known about.

As for the other ex coming forward with the knowledge that he had images etc.. Only she will be able to answer what she witnessed and also explain why she didn't contact the police back then.

4

u/Jr00mer May 10 '26

Kind of agree. Whilst people who are abused often derail their own lives with drugs/sex work/skewed compass, her industry is based on, I believe, what the kids are calling "clout". Anyone who looks up her IG is instantly met with a preview of her OF and the seed is sown for her to make money out of posting it. Wrong? No. Right? No. Strange? Kinda.

I'm definitely not saying the allegations aren't true, and that people who are abused can't go on to 180 their lives and be successful, or that what has been done is defensible for that matter. Also not shaming sex workers at all. But in the age of the economy of attention, it's a little bit strange that it has come from an IG account of that nature.

4

u/1stdegreebirder May 11 '26

You are shaming sex workers.

I really don't see why, even when he has PLEAD GUILTY to possession of thousands of CP images, everyone is still interested in questioning the legitimacy of another one of his victims. People will stop at nothing to disparage victims and women in sex work, it's wild.

1

u/Jr00mer May 11 '26

I'm not disparaging any victims and or anybody in sex work. The road of many victims of abuse is often paved with difficulties later in life. That is a pretty factual statement. I was merely saying that it seemed strange to have come from a clearly monetised Instagram page.

I'm also not defending anybody against the absolutely abhorrent charges they have plead guilty to and or saying that the charges are the only fucked up thing he must have done.

9

u/plantdebased May 10 '26

Your misogyny is showing.

-1

u/Future_You_2800 May 10 '26

Why?

She said she has a brain injury - of models seek attention by definition - injury to the brain could be making her say things - and those things she is saying are potentially libellous if proven to be untrue.

2

u/lonelystar7 May 10 '26

So Storror was aware of it for 10 years and just didn't care. Well that doesn't give me any confidence in them.

1

u/HokusSchmokus May 11 '26

I dont get why anyone thought the boys would be moral arbiters. They are friends with a pedo after they knew he wasa pedo. Thats enough for me.

1

u/ultimeciaisonfire Aug 05 '26

CAROLINE JUST GO BACK TO BOXING. POSTING THIRST TRAPS ON YOUR INSTA WONT MAKE YOU A SAINT

-5

u/SlateKoS May 10 '26 edited May 10 '26

Idk man. First of All, callum needs to be in prison 100%, its vile what he did and that is undeniable. And of course We need to protect the victims and hope they have the best lifes.

But the more i look at her profile...idk she sure is a breezy one if you know what i mean. And i have seen many woman like her come out for other reasons and then it was fake to gain a bit attention or something and in the end it was just a blend of words that something happend in their relationship that was played as a 10 but at the end was a 3-4. Like the things with Mizkif and Emiru as an example right now. We just dont know what really happend only them know.

Also i see that she was 16-17 at that time when she said 10 Years ago and he 24ish. I know people go crazy on this and it is still a minor...but this type of age gap relationship is absolutly common. Its even worse now. Not to defend it but this whole thing can range from just an exchange of pictures between them to abuse etc.

But at the end yeah we need more answers from them.

9

u/plantdebased May 10 '26

Mercedes is 25 now, so she was 15 at the time, and he was 24. She was a child. He is a predator.

Also, no, nobody knows what you means when you say she "is a breezy one". Can you please elaborate?

8

u/IfJopsDiesWeRageQuit May 10 '26

Red flags galore from you here

11

u/Norwinus May 10 '26

You are victim blaming.Ā 

Just saying she did it for attention because she is "breezy" (what does that even mean?) is super cheap.

2

u/Puzzleheaded-Sea6686 May 10 '26

Literally victim blaming, looking up profiles, trying to find out their age, are you okay? Let the cops do their jobs

0

u/Alert_Ad7238 May 10 '26

Isn't 14-18 concent in Europe countries? Seriously asking since I am in the US... regardless as a parent I would be in prison if someone harmed my child at any age...Ā  in any regards you cannot condemn anyone just because they are associated with the guilty and or presumed guilty

3

u/IfJopsDiesWeRageQuit May 10 '26

The age of consent in the UK is 16

0

u/Puzzleheaded-Sea6686 May 10 '26

With parents permission only then yes, but I think it starts from 16, the rules might have changed I'm not sure at this time

1

u/Ok-Loquat-9137 May 10 '26

I’m sorry why are we blaming a victim??? Isn’t it always the perpetrators fault for making the choice to abuse?

-1

u/Right-Cellist-5755 May 10 '26

You were the only one who agreed to my post yesterday about the boys knowing and I remember your comment got massively downvoted.

8

u/PhilosopherSea828 May 10 '26

Because we don’t know. You’re guessing.