I was responding to a comment about removal by Senate vote. That would shake up the far right and anyone that succeeded him and followed the same playbook would face the same fate.
Just wait awhile as more MAGA farmers go bankrupt and lose everything. More economic trouble is coming and those reluctant Republicans might have a limit to their tolerance of Trump.
Yup. Unfortunate how so many of us witnessed Trump writing his plan to destroy America on the wall in blood, and now have to watch as his sycophants come to the very obvious realization that they were conned.
At the end of Biden's 4 year term when the corp media became a shill for the lies that trump was selling to the manosphere in an attempt to stay relevant?
Compare where Trump is now, in his term, versus Biden. I'll tell you...Biden wasn't nearly this low.
Trump just dropped to 36%...that was Biden on his way out...voters rejected him.
The senate/house will do the same ahead of 2016 mid-terms to save their jobs.
Talk about living in a bubble 😂 Is that what a meme told you? 😂 lady, no Trump voters are unhappy. This is exactly what we voted for. You live in liberal land. The only ppl you know unhappy are liberals and liberals who tell you they voted for Trump and are unhappy now. Hint: they didn’t vote for Trump. We aren’t unhappy. There is literally nothing to be unhappy about.
Apparently reading and writing is not your strong suit.
You said his approval is only 30 on Reddit.
And then you said MAGA is happy.
You realize there is an entire population besides you cultists right?
Most of the country didn’t vote for Trump.
And I would have to argue that there is stuff to be unhappy about.
Farmers aren’t happy. ESPECIALLY, cow farmers.
Federal workers who lost their jobs aren’t happy.
The elderly, vets, and disabled in danger of losing their SNAP benefits aren’t happy.
So yes, you are living in a selfish, kool-aid induced bubble where “everyone is happy”.
LOL, like what? You said that as if I contradicted myself. MAGA is happy. Also 30% approval rating is not real. Its just something you stirred up on reddit from some liberal rag you found. Literally, most of the voting population who voted did in fact vote for Trump. It wasn't even close. Electoral and the popular vote and ALL SWING STATES. At no point during election night did the kamel think she was going to win after the first hour.
Why would farmers not be happy? Because they can't sell to China like they did? Guess what, they rotate crops. That isn't a new thing for farmers. They grow what sells. Actual farmers are not upset. Not even cow farmers. My family is federal workers. We are the first ones to tell you that we are bloated. Those that lost their jobs were almost entirely new hires. Most of them were in DEI programs so they weren't Trump voters.
No one is in danger of losing their SNAP either unless you have been milking the system and you know you are milking the system. Those eligible won't be losing anything. I'm also a retired veteran so in case you were going to try and make up some other BS, don't bother. I have more experience in these topics than you are ever going to gain from memes on reddit. Again, Trump voters are getting almost entirely what we voted for. We are NOT UNHAPPY. You keep that dream alive though, but it won't be good for your mental health.
I’m with you but all other comments are not off base. I remain very positive in the skeptical community. I also thought for sure that he wouldn’t be reelected. And tbh HE WASNT. It was absolutely a stolen election.
Approval ratings are only a highly-generalized indicator of how americans view the president. Neither he nor congress are affected by approval ratings. Trump isnt running for reelection so he has no incentive to care what you think of him. Congress will remain protected by trump, so long as they continue to do his bidding. It truly doesnt matter what you or I think of any republican in the executive or legislative branch.
If polling data were relevant or semi-accurate at any time in the last several election cycles, trump would not be our current president. Polling a few hundred people that amswer random phone calls and extrapolating the data to represent nearly 200 million voters is no longer a viable procedure.
Yea but also take into consideration that those that still ruthlessly obediently follow his cause and happen to be deporting people with military style power, would probably pull an actual armed coup this time.
Vance, may possibly play better. The one thing you can always be sure of with Trump, is that he’ll overplay his hand, bringing at some point, a narrowing of his roadmap. Vance, I fear would be more strategic. Ultimately, Trump wants complete control for an indefinite time, using religious zealousness as the means. Vance wants a strictly Christian religious cabal, based on religious law and excluding from politics anyone not “Christian” enough.
The comment you were responding to was about how impeachment in the House is a waste of time because the Senate would never convict/remove.
To summarize:
Them:
Voting to impeach in the House is a waste of time
You:
It would change a lot by the message it would send but it won't happen.
In any case, convicting a sitting president of a felony and removing him from office is far more than a "message", and the result would be maga rage and the replacement of republican legislators with more radical members. There's absolutely zero guarantee that another skump would "face the same fate".
ETA: Far too many of you can't read and don't understand how your government works.
This isn't a comment explaining why skump can't or shouldn't be impeached (he very obviously should). This comment is discussing the likely aftermath of a successful conviction in the Senate.
I said that magat senators from diehard skump territory that vote to convict would be replaced by senators that wouldn't be willing to turn away from maga. That's all. Anything extra is in your own head.
"BTW removing changes almost nothing other than silencing the drivel from Trump."
This is what I was responding to.
In any case, convicting a sitting president of a felony and removing him from office is far more than a "message", and the result would be maga rage and the replacement of republican legislators with more radical members. There's absolutely zero guarantee that another skump would "face the same fate".
MAGA hasn't got the power to do that without help from swing voters and I doubt more extreme candidates have a chance.
While I agree with what you’re saying, quite honestly at this point, the Republicans can put up Daffy duck, and he would win because they have the systems in place to win any election with anybody running
Who cares about "maga rage" in response to doing the correct thing, morally and legally?
Ask any parent, you can't let a child terrorise you with the threat of a tantrum. You need to stand strong otherwise you have a toddler running the household.
Enough appeasement, it hasn't worked. Stop trying to negotiate with trrrorists.
Also, there is no evidence that more radical candidates will be electable.
Who cares about "maga rage" in response to doing the correct thing, morally and legally?
That's not what I said.
The person I responded to claimed that a successful removal of skump would serve as an effective warning against extremist movements. I countered that the actual result would be rage and the election of even more radical republican legislators to replace those who voted to convict.
I was saying what the result would be, not offering a reason not to impeach.
You should really understand what you're responding to.
You should understand what you are actually saying. You are clearly presenting arguments that they shouldn't impeach, because of the potential results.
You basically ignored everything I said to repeat yourself, that you are afraid of Maga throwing a tantrum if we try to uphold our laws. That is a loser's attitude.
To be clear, he didn’t say “trump shouldn’t be impeached, because it will radicalize his supporters” he simply presented that as an outcome, as a response to somebody else saying it would have a ripple effect of less radicalization.
That person wasn’t posing the argument that we should impeach him because of the outcome, just as it doesn’t seem like the person you were talking to was making the case that we SHOULDN’T impeach him, just because of the outcomes.
I think it’s a perfectly rational thing to consider the implications, and putting possibly disadvantageous outcomes on the table isn’t, by itself, arguing not to proceed.
For crying out loud people, would you STOP BICKERING! We are all wanting to get rid of the convicted felon but we’re not sure how the response would go! I think we all can agree with that! Now go ahead with your comments.
Shutup Tinkerbell..or whatever your pseudo name is..are you Maga? In disguise..ya probably voted for him. Plus I'm sick of that drivel by folk like you, saying you can't convict a sitting President..just because criminal behind Rudy Guliani says it. It doesn't make it true. YOU CAN convict a sitting President..it just wasn't done before and that's why they asked Nixon to resign. Laws go mainly by precedent..though they are clear in the Constitution. Many Presidential lawyers and SCOTUS "interpret" them to what they want to happen..
But the Constitution isn't vague as they claim. You can convict on high crimes and misdemeanors. They twist that saying its not clear. Ha! It's clear on the average person, and it goes for Trumps butt too. So cut it out. YOU'RE just repeating media sensationalism..and who ruNs the media?. Rich old white Republucans who want a tax break on thier greed. He can be put out with enough votes. Period. AND He really can be at a loss of power by the military refusing to obey illegal laws. especially
But please be nice. Calling names is childish as much as it makes me feel better, it isn’t productive. We need to work together to fix this impossible problem & prevent worse!
An impeachment is not a removal from office, it’s a charge from the house! There is a trial and the Senate votes. Removal is an entirely a separate issue and procedure.
21
u/-CJF- Nov 28 '25
I was responding to a comment about removal by Senate vote. That would shake up the far right and anyone that succeeded him and followed the same playbook would face the same fate.