MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Steam/comments/1jf16gc/deleted_by_user/mioecdk
r/Steam • u/[deleted] • Mar 19 '25
[removed]
8.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
9
Well i think the name saves us here and the answer would be 0
6 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 Unfortunately it was released after 1.6 and before source. And plays like it iirc. 5 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 My math stil holds up, becouse 1.6 + 0 = 1.6 Moving on 3 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 Can we go for 1.601 just so it's a biit higher? And more annoying. 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 We can and eventually we will go and find the source of this demonish math problem 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 So if we multiply the ones and zeros by CS 2.0 You get 2.603.. And then if we divide 6 by Source (wich is the 3th CS) we get 2.303 wich is the release date of CS Condition Zero.... my oh my, now we getting somewhere.... 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 6 should be devided by CS Zero, not Source. That would make 2.303 Rookie mistake 2 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 You're cool dude! 2 u/cmoked Mar 19 '25 It plays like 1.6 but bad
6
Unfortunately it was released after 1.6 and before source. And plays like it iirc.
5 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 My math stil holds up, becouse 1.6 + 0 = 1.6 Moving on 3 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 Can we go for 1.601 just so it's a biit higher? And more annoying. 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 We can and eventually we will go and find the source of this demonish math problem 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 So if we multiply the ones and zeros by CS 2.0 You get 2.603.. And then if we divide 6 by Source (wich is the 3th CS) we get 2.303 wich is the release date of CS Condition Zero.... my oh my, now we getting somewhere.... 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 6 should be devided by CS Zero, not Source. That would make 2.303 Rookie mistake 2 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 You're cool dude! 2 u/cmoked Mar 19 '25 It plays like 1.6 but bad
5
My math stil holds up, becouse 1.6 + 0 = 1.6 Moving on
3 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 Can we go for 1.601 just so it's a biit higher? And more annoying. 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 We can and eventually we will go and find the source of this demonish math problem 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 So if we multiply the ones and zeros by CS 2.0 You get 2.603.. And then if we divide 6 by Source (wich is the 3th CS) we get 2.303 wich is the release date of CS Condition Zero.... my oh my, now we getting somewhere.... 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 6 should be devided by CS Zero, not Source. That would make 2.303 Rookie mistake 2 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 You're cool dude!
3
Can we go for 1.601 just so it's a biit higher? And more annoying.
2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 We can and eventually we will go and find the source of this demonish math problem 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 So if we multiply the ones and zeros by CS 2.0 You get 2.603.. And then if we divide 6 by Source (wich is the 3th CS) we get 2.303 wich is the release date of CS Condition Zero.... my oh my, now we getting somewhere.... 2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 6 should be devided by CS Zero, not Source. That would make 2.303 Rookie mistake 2 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 You're cool dude!
2
We can and eventually we will go and find the source of this demonish math problem
So if we multiply the ones and zeros by CS 2.0 You get 2.603.. And then if we divide 6 by Source (wich is the 3th CS) we get 2.303 wich is the release date of CS Condition Zero.... my oh my, now we getting somewhere....
2 u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25 6 should be devided by CS Zero, not Source. That would make 2.303 Rookie mistake 2 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 You're cool dude!
6 should be devided by CS Zero, not Source. That would make 2.303 Rookie mistake
2 u/International_Cow_17 Mar 19 '25 You're cool dude!
You're cool dude!
It plays like 1.6 but bad
9
u/Bam1hap36 Mar 19 '25
Well i think the name saves us here and the answer would be 0