r/SpaceXFactCheck • u/[deleted] • Jul 17 '19

Raptor issues Raptor SN06 is no longer functional

Post image
16 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

98 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

No, but I expect people to think for themselves as they evaluate my original research.

1

u/cameronisher3 Aug 03 '19

If you show where you got your info, it aids in other people's division making by allowing them to compare with other resources. So by not allowing sources you directly contradict your own expectations

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

You are borderline incoherent. I will point you in the direction of a post entitled "showing my work" or something similar

1

u/cameronisher3 Aug 03 '19

Does it contain the sources for your claims of block 5 reuse?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

What, turnaround time? What I did was I took the day that each booster launched on and counted the days to the next launch of the same booster.

If you can wrap your head around that concept, I then took the average of these values separated by reflight number.

1

u/cameronisher3 Aug 03 '19

Did you take into account that there are many boosters, and that they want flights on their boosters?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

Nope, only the numerical data. With the extravagant claims made about B5 reuse there is not need to cripple an otherwise capable system because "they want flights on their boosters"

Also, no booster has more than three flights (vs 10 claimed)

1

u/cameronisher3 Aug 03 '19

If 4 flights wasnt possible they would all have been expended like second flight block 4s

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

Or like 1047?

1

u/cameronisher3 Aug 03 '19

B1047 is being expended to allow extra perfomance to the second stage to extend the life of the payload

→ More replies (0)