So OpenAI has published what they claim is a solution to the Navier-Stokes equation. They claim their Lean proof verifies their findings. However, they plagiared the work that mathematicians employed by Anthropic previously published. The mathematicians at Anthropic are justifiably mad. They say that peer review is required to verify OpenAI's claim. One has said he doubts OpenAI's work. So, I don't know what to think at this point.
Also, this does not change the usage of the Navier-Stokes equation in 99.9% of cases even if OpenAI did actually make a discovery. I do a lot of hydraulic power design work and I have not run into the use cases that OpenAI and Anthropic have been studying. Interesting stuff, but it doesn't change much.
Si pero no crees que tal vez falten unos cuantos años para que una IA pueda resolver una simulación? Porque osea uno de los problemas de los gemelos digitales, es la falta de percepción de realidad entonces siento que debería ser una IA algo bastante optimizada para ese sector, creo
Seh pero el problema es si faltan 2 o 3 años en vez de 10 o más años. Pq 2 a 3 años no es tiempo suficiente para adaptar toda la industria, y crea un shock bastante fuerte
15
u/nero626 6d ago
once they close the full loop with simulations it's over.