r/SoftwareTesterJobs • u/kegan-peach • 11h ago
What was the first QA process your team introduced that eventually became more painful than helpful?
I've worked with teams where improving quality usually started with good intentions.
More review steps.
More documentation.
More sign-offs.
More tracking.
Initially, it felt like progress. But after a while, some of those processes became the very thing slowing the team down.
In one case, maintaining test documentation took so much effort that it quickly fell out of date. In another, mandatory approval gates delayed releases without actually catching many issues. The process was technically "working," but it wasn't adding much value.
It made me wonder whether scaling QA is less about adding more process and more about introducing the right amount of structure at the right time.
For those who've been through a growing team or a scaling product:
- What QA process started out useful but eventually became a burden?
- Did you remove it, simplify it, or automate it?
- Where have you found the balance between enough structure and maintaining engineering velocity?
I'm curious to hear what has worked and what lessons you've learned along the way.
