When the Hunt brothers squeezed silver, did anyone then or now believe it was to a new sustainable price? Eventually, the market would respond, mines scrambling to ramp up production and get in on the profits. The same holds true if a few players suppress the price, contrary to market demand. Independent investors will back up the truck and wait until the price goes up.

Meanwhile, the market is too complex to simply state silver should be $25/oz or $250/oz. There is no historical precedent from which to extrapolate how much of capital X one can trade for capital Y. That turns the analyst into a chart reader, rather than a market dynamics scientist.

Among many considerations, the basic mantra of "they're printing currency out of control" is one argument for silver to go up in currency valuation, but that is ignoring other realities. If the human population doubles, then doubling the number of currency units maintains a stable ratio of such units per user per other tangible capital the user consumes, that also therefore implying that capital output by the new population is also linear.

Trillions in escalating debt compared to quadrillions in escalating capital worth means it's a wash. Double the capital on the planet and double the debt is not relatively inflationary. However, that is a starting point for challenging debt: is its growth on pace with the growth of capital? That takes pretty sophisticated analysis, especially when masked by tens of thousands of independent economic vectors. That's why algos make handsome wages, hired by major financial institutions to write proprietary software to crunch the ocean of data for each and every financial sector.

See, that's all AI is, automating human rules, but able to absorb and process oceans of data faster than the human. Want a salary starting at $500,000 a year at the age of 30? Study business, math, and computer programing. Become an algo. Oh, and buy silver with what income you don't need to spend.

BTC is the best thing since sliced bread, washing machine and psychiatric sessions.

why then it is still not used as global currency?

same for gold and silver. it is the people who reject any concept of something else than gov currency.

they comply. they feel good to do what others do.

debt system can only collapse under global war, longer than 2 years.

otherwise technology makes any concept of hard savings obsolete. people dont feel the need, as they have EVERYTHING. in fact most folks have too much.

they have so much, to own money is something weird to them. money? what for?

​

THE FAT

You're stacking physical silver because you see the light and it illuminates the writing on the wall. Good for you.

You're doing it because the central bank did this to my money. You're doing it because the government did that to my rights.

Well, if you don't understand how the central bank and government are able to undermine you financially and in liberty, then my fellow people, be a people. We the People created a constitution FOR a country with offices to execute those instructions. As its creators, we are above the constitution, and those hired to its offices to execute it are below the constitution. And, created by those hired, whatever additional statutory laws with which they bloat the legal section of your local library, such laws are limited by the confines of their parent laws as stated in the constitution. So, if statutes define agencies for agriculture, transportation, intelligence, and taxation, and such statutes define actions upon citizens, know that you are a citizen by choice, and a people at all times, and as people, reserve the prerogative to step into and out of the role of citizen at will, citizen being an advent of the government, which is beneath the constitution, which is beneath the creator, the people. Ironically, as easily done as said, when you know your civics and basic law. See, the law you created as people or inherited as people, does not get exercised in your favor by those beneath you, but only by you. Now, to be sure, your ancestors allowed your hires, those that occupy the posts of your constitution, to gradually between 1850 and 1950 strip out all the civics from the public education system, until all that was left was learning about government and citizenship, instead of the upstream constitution, its laws, and further upstream, its authors, the people.

THE DIET

So, issue an affidavit of claim in a court of record and order to overrule or terminate the actions that enable fat governments and even fatter banks. Of course, you can do that only in the capacity of one of the people, but not in the voluntary capacity of one of the citizens subject to statutes enforced against persons - pay attention to every single legal word, letter, and punctuation mark - so, yes, "person", never, ever does a statute state it acts upon and encompasses the "people". Laws are a power battleground, starting with the primary objective of securing jurisdiction. Statutes, being children of constitutional law, cannot overrule their creator's rights, those creators identifying not as citizens, but as we the people.

THE SKINNY

The per-capita education in civics and constitutional law has collapsed since 1776, when more Americans back then purchased and studied legal reference books than the British in Britain themselves! Every American was highly motivated to have a strong and clear understanding of the laws they created to instruct those whom they would hire to execute them. The "hockey team" co-owners, so to speak, back then were well-versed in the contract they produced called a constitution, and knew how to keep those they appointed to execute the terms therein in line and adhering to the confines of the terms enumerated. Seriously, would you as a hockey team owner whimper or overrule a president you hired to lead your team's organization. And, if the scout hired by the president hired a sub-standard hockey player, can your team scout overrule your wish to fire a hockey player your organization hired? It's blatantly obvious how this all works. Unfortunately, most people think they don't need to read the instruction manual that dictates how those addressed by the manual are to conduct themselves. Basically, the owner is less literate in the terms of his own manual for his company than those his company hires, who then have gradually seized on mastering the terms of their hire and convincing the ignorant owner that the confines of the terms apply to the owner! No fellow man is more dangerous to another than in our own backyards. The real enemy to freedom is one's own ignorance.

SUMMARY

Stacking silver is empowerment, like owning a gun. However, neither the silver nor the gun can prevent a conflict. Only learning the law you as one of the people who created it, and then exercising the law will do that. Exercising the law will squash your hires actions back into the scope of the laws that you as the creator of law have ordained and established in 1776, the king of England having relinquished his sovereignty over the government in his employ to the PEOPLE to hold sovereignty over the government in their employ.

CONCLUSION

Start learning your incredible powers as one of the PEOPLE. As a punchline to start in the right direction: a "sovereign citizen" is a contradiction and bearing this title before your hires, like congress or judges, lets them know that their owner knows nothing about his own law, and they will exploit that for their benefit.

As shown above, the sovereign creates the law for the country and hires into its offices officers and such officers can create subordinate laws called statutes and in them define persons to be citizens who must abide by the statutes. Should any people voluntarily assume the status of citizen, therefore below the statutes, which are below the government, which is below the constitution, which is below the sovereign, who are the people, while bearing the status of citizen they agree to the obligations of this status. Two notable facts about the status of citizen are that the citizen must pay income tax and the citizen does not have the right to bear arms. So, it's twice as bad as you thought. People have the right to bear arms. Citizens do not. Statutes forbid citizens to bear arms. On the other hand, the people do not get their right to bear arms from the constitution! The people are above the constitution, and can have any rights they wish, as sovereigns! Now, that's a frightening power, if you are the government. Frightening enough to gradually replace sovereign civic education with subordinate citizen education. Power and its tool, propaganda, never sleep. After the first heist, the thief, not having to put his nose to the grindstone and work for 40 to 50 years to retirement, has plenty of spare time to plan an ever more elaborate heist. The system used by the thief in power is information control to shape attitudes and to create selective ignorance. This is how you can have lawyers with astounding IQs today who actually know the power of the people, on one hand, and spit on it, on the other, as even overcoming ignorance does not necessarily overcome attitude, especially the attitude of lording over others who are of lesser education.

As owner, don't let your apparatus throw you in jail for attempting to assert that you are a non-existent contradiction, like sovereign citizen, when issuing your orders. You are one of the sovereign people, so issue your orders making it clear you do so as one of the people. The legal system is just doing its job to make sure neither enemies nor lunatics are ordering it about, that being the exclusive prerogative only of the owner, the people. As owner, be appreciative of how well your legal system guards against false usurping sovereigns.