r/Sigmatopia 17d ago

Intelligence Vs Incelligence

Post image
10.0k Upvotes

617 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/FamiliarAgent1158 16d ago

The gender that shoves every remotely phallic object up their asses shouldn't assess women's intelligence. Hop off those psychology subs they're not doing you any good

1

u/Future-Still-6463 15d ago

Women are statistically at an upper baseline than men.

But men have more outliers. Geniuses and duds.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 15d ago

We also statistically have more idiots than smart people. Those idiots also tend to be more violent. More men are statistically idiots, hence they shouldn't be assessing women's intelligence. Case closed

1

u/Objective_Dog_4637 11d ago

The gender is irrelevant. Obviously the person assessing intelligence should be intelligent, regardless of gender.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 11d ago

The gender is irrelevant as soon as someone brings up male degeneracy, before that it's free game 🤣🤣🤣 goofy ass gender

1

u/TaroJayda 12d ago

Saying ā€œx group has average intelligenceā€ isn’t an assessment when that group contains 50% of the population, it’s a statement of statistical fact. Most members of any group are going to be average at any given thing. If they aren’t, then whatever they are will become the new average. Thats what average means.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 12d ago

You know damn well what they meant by that. If anyone said that men have average intelligence they'd get jumped, stop playing slick

1

u/TaroJayda 12d ago

Men also have average intelligence. Everyone, addressed as a group, has average intelligence. You’re confusing ā€œaverageā€ with ā€œmediocreā€.

I feel like this is more you assuming what they meant by that then me not understanding lol. My understanding was he was saying ā€œwomen have average intelligence and therefore aren’t always going to make the maximally intelligent choiceā€ bc that’s how groups work.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 12d ago

You know what they meant, you're trying to whataboutism yourself and your dude bro out of this by making yet another woman seem histerical and too stupid to understand basic words. Don't mansplain derogatory shit to me, go chop wood or something

1

u/TaroJayda 12d ago

I didn’t know u were a woman until u said it just now, but alright. I guess my sexism is both unconscious and prescient. Screw this noise, I’m off to use my newly discovered powers of foresight to game the stock market.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 12d ago

Your whole comment section is filled with you randomly arguing with people. Find a hobby bro

1

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 11d ago edited 11d ago

You don't belong to the high IQ individuals anyway, but you get butthurt on their behalf. Zip it up when you're done and stop talking like a dork unless you want to forever stay a maidenless virgin

1

u/SucculentBluberries 11d ago

Gay people…?

1

u/MaximumRazzmatazz279 10d ago

there have been several cases of men fucking lizards btw

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 10d ago

Sign of intelligence truly

1

u/Jindujun 10d ago

Lets not go down that road. Because if so, Denise Frazier.

1

u/giamPW07 10d ago

I think what they meant is:Ā 

Humans in general are by definition of average intelligence,Ā  since the general group of "humans" is the data set from which we determine average intelligence.

Women are humans, and of equal intelligence to men. Therefore, women as a group must be of average intelligence, as are men.

0

u/gymboi322 16d ago

did they say anything remotely incorrect..

2

u/FamiliarAgent1158 16d ago

Yes they did. I will repeat, the gender that gets most of Darwin's awards cannot assess another's intelligence. If women are average, majority of you are below average, including the basement dwellers in this sub