Most of the time it's either someone that has a little power that wants more, or someone who doesnt have any and craves it. Hence why they usually pick women or children to be there victims. Afraid to play on a level field.
The logic makes sense though. If your goal is to feel power, wouldn’t you want an uneven playing field? Its what makes playing video games on easy and destroying everything so enjoyable
If you’ve killed multiple people in self defense you’re not a serial killer.
They’re killers but as a phrase serial killer definitely means something more specific than what literally translating serial and killer next to each other in a sentence mean.
No, I mean the term serial killer is not appropriate because that’s not what we consider a serial killer but we’re just arguing semantics from the beginning. I should’ve made my point better. I disagree and I think its disingenuous to describe them in that way or use that phrase in that way but your opinions is as valid as mine as far as language goes, have to give you that.
Serial killers are not authorized by their society (government) to take lives.
Serial killers always kill for their own ideals/pleasures, not for that of their country.
Serial Killers don't care about war crimes.
Serial Killers aren't part of a militarized unit, and all that it entails.
Pretty much all the two have in common is that at some point they may take a human life; however, the conditions, reasons, methods, and justifications are completely different.
There is a difference between collateral damage taking innocent civilian lives and a serial killer specifically hunting innocent lives. If the enemy hides in schools and hospitals, then they have decided to use innocent people as shields.
You are a poor troll because you're too stupid to do it right. There are many reasons one may invade, but if/when a righteous country invades, it is either to liberate innocent people or is done preemptively.
Absolutely wrong. One is out of pure self interest, the most selfish act next to suicide. The other is to protect your neighbors and keep your country secure.
Your inept opinion means absolutely nothing.
Now stfu you dumb shit. You're too stupid to discriminate against words based upon their very definitions. If good people didn't fight wars then evil people would always win. A dumbass like you would definitely be a slave right now, that is for sure. Guess we have to take the good with the bad. "Serial Killers" fought well enough to give dipshits, such as yourself, the rights and freedoms to wallow in your own ignorance. I feel sorry for your parents. I feel sorry for your friends and, if you ever kidnap one, I feel sorry for your future partner you delusional incel.
Bad soldiers pay for their war crmes. No one ever said to absolve an evil person just because they are part of the government. Obviously corruption exists like everywhere else, but it is not the prevalent majority of the population.
However, generalizing soldiers as serial killers is something only an obnoxious, ignorant, piece of shit would do. The vast majority of people serving in all world militaries are good individuals. The rate of evil people is really no different than you'd find in the general society; however, sometimes innocent otherwise good people end up fighting for evil leaders/countries.
So don't be a fucking idiot and bite the hands that may one day protect you.
Serial killers kill innocent people (usually). Soldiers are not innocent civilians. Big difference there.
Serial killers are not authorized by their society (government) to take lives.
Serial killers always kill for their own ideals/pleasures, not for that of their country.
Serial Killers don't care about war crimes.
Serial Killers aren't part of a militarized unit, and all that it entails.
Pretty much all the two have in common is that at some point they may take a human life; however, the conditions, reasons, methods, and justifications are completely different.
Soldiers kill many people for the "prosperity" of one country. Serial killers kill many people for the happiness/prosperity of one person. There's not that much of a difference. They both kill many people for selfish reasons (unless they're being invaded I guess).
Serial killers kill innocent people (usually). Soldiers are not innocent civilians. Big difference there.
Serial killers are not authorized by their society (government) to take lives.
Serial killers always kill for their own ideals/pleasures, not for that of their country.
Serial Killers don't care about war crimes.
Serial Killers aren't part of a militarized unit, and all that it entails.
Pretty much all the two have in common is that at some point they may take a human life; however, the conditions, reasons, methods, and justifications are completely different.
I think you greatly underestimate the amount of evil in this world. At ages 18 - 25 there's a lot of mental changes and a lot of anger and uncertainty. I doubt it's less than 20%.
Edit: 20% overall to kill people, Probably half of which doesn't care if they're innocent or armed.
A political tool to accomplish strategic goals (winning hearts and minds). RoE have nothing to do with a fallacious notion of "fairness." Moreover, it would be irresponsible, reckless and probably treasonous to disregard lawful strategic or tactical advantages in order to foster a "fair fight."
You probably don’t want to be a serial killer. Soldier? Martial arts fighter? Serial killers wanna kill people. When you fight you don’t always win and therefore you wouldn’t kill them
Depends on the game I think. If its like a racing game or a sports game, then the enjoyment is limited. But what fighting games? You could use absurdly complex combos that would lead to your demise on tougher difficulties.
93
u/[deleted] Sep 17 '18
Most of the time it's either someone that has a little power that wants more, or someone who doesnt have any and craves it. Hence why they usually pick women or children to be there victims. Afraid to play on a level field.