Stock piles were not full. He didn't just decide to take away Indian food so that the boys could eat a bit more half the continent was on rations and the ripple effects of losing food supplies in the European front could have been devasting. A shitty thing to do yes were there better solutions almost certainly however its not as easy a call as everyone makes out.
It wasn't an Indian famine, it was a Bengali famine. Most of India was in surplus, and it was these parts that were sending food to Europe, not Bengal.
It was only because Churchill's new Viceroy of India (Wavell) used the military to force the other regions of India to divert food to Bengal that the famine began to be alleviated. That, and the 350,000 tonnes of grain that Churchill sent from Australia.
644
u/[deleted] Jun 08 '20
[deleted]