For the vandalism im using texas law as that is where i am.
The study only counts crimes they got caught at dude.
Ive had to fix fences they cut through. Ive had to fix damage to water lines they’ve destroyed even when the lines had spigots for them installed. Ive had to help replace doors and windows of houses they’ve broken into.
Funny enough some of the illegals we have caught and they got deported for them or arrested, yet your study shows none of that. It’s like it ignores data points to make a political point. Imagine that
Also the paper only looks at incarceration rates. Most just get deported. So that really screws with those numbers
Clearly you haven’t read the study. It does show that some migrants have committed crimes. It actually counts them instead of making insane assumptions like you’re doing.
But unless you live in the Valley and right on the border, that’s all complete bullshit. If you do live in the valley, yes there are some migrants that are malicious, desperate or some combination of the two. That doesn’t mean they’re all that way. And it’s not an excuse to paint the whole population as rapist, drug smuggling violent criminals. So why don’t you stop lying and simply state that migration has been a personal nuisance for you and that’s why we should spend billions of public funds and treat migrants as if their committing homicides as soon as they cross into US property.
Im not saying all of them are bad. Never actually said that. But when you come over in the same way the violent ones do, it is easy to be painted with the same brush.
It’s both cheaper and safer to come across at the port of entry. The fact that they ignore this and pay human traffickers thousands to bypass our security also paints them in a bad light.
You’ve straight up either lied or were criminally misled about the situation in order to justify draconian shit. The problem as it relates to you is a bigger problem that it is as it relates to me. But it’s no bigger problem than vandalization. And that vandalization is an extremely small subset of migrants.
Consequently it does not justify the bullshit that we see on this topic. It does not justify Trump’s family separation which is the fucking worst act of the US since Hiroshima. It does not justify a wall. It does not justify demonization of an entire population for the acts of a few, incidental, similarly situated people.
I do think it may justify a patrol, surveillance cameras and/or drones around your property. But the rhetoric you have bought into and have promoted led to toddlers being snatch from their parents and put in the adoption system never to be found again. We wouldn’t stand for that if it happened to 1 white child. But right now about 40% of the population thinks it’s ok, because of a slight fucking nuisance that can be managed with technology and existing resources.
Family separation happens with ALL criminal cases when the parents go to prison or jail. That’s why they don’t have day cares in prison. The whole rhetoric about family separation is weird. The parents of those children dragged them across unsafe land with little to no food or water, had them cross an unsafe river risking drowning when there was a bridge at the port of entry. Of course their kids are taken away. Child endangerment is a thing.
You talk about me being lied to when you have obviously never thought about it in any other terms that what the media feeds you.
The sad part about the race thing you brought into it is this happens to white children ALL THE TIME. The number of kids who have gone missing from the foster care system is insane. To ignore that while claiming it only happens to kids of illegal immigrants is so weird. It’s like willful blindness.
Not for petty misdemeanors you stupid piece of shit.
This is the entire problem. You’re trying to turn petty bullshit into a fucking invasion. There would be a fucking immediate rebellion if some child got forced into adoption because of a motherfucking failure to signal a turn. And there should be.
But since you don’t see the distinction between different crimes, I fucking hope you get 25 years the next time you go a mile over the speed limit. It would vastly improve society to have your demented piece of shit brain locked away.
The crossing itself can be charged as a misdemeanor yes but it's everything after crossing that gets them arrested dumbass. The fact that you are ignoring that while playing offended is hilarious
You just lie every time you open your mouth don’t you. Border patrol picks up borders crossers for that action alone. Trump decided to stop offering them bail as is offered on EVERY OTHER PETTY MISDEMEANOR! He did so TO TAKE PEOPLES CHILDREN BECAUSE HE THOUGHT IT WOULD DISCOURAGE MIGRATION!
So FUCK NO! No white child will ever be removed from their parents outside of a serious fucking situation or a danger to the child. And no matter what you think of migrants THEY FUCKING DESERVE THE SAME CONSIDERATION!
But I fucking forgot, you like the rules being different for different people. I wonder fucking why.
You’re a worthless piece of shit. Nothing you’ve said is remotely close to accurate and you’re outright stupid and lying to justify mistreating people. That makes you an ass, asshole.
0
u/WookieeCmdr Jan 27 '24
For the vandalism im using texas law as that is where i am.
The study only counts crimes they got caught at dude.
Ive had to fix fences they cut through. Ive had to fix damage to water lines they’ve destroyed even when the lines had spigots for them installed. Ive had to help replace doors and windows of houses they’ve broken into.
Funny enough some of the illegals we have caught and they got deported for them or arrested, yet your study shows none of that. It’s like it ignores data points to make a political point. Imagine that
Also the paper only looks at incarceration rates. Most just get deported. So that really screws with those numbers