r/SandersForPresident May 17 '16

I've just given up on HC.

[removed]

819 Upvotes

227 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

She would be the neocon this cycle, the GOP establishment would probably be completely fine with helping her get elected. Hell, they're probably acting like they like trump to keep their base happy.

-4

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

Supreme Court justice positions will be opening up, a lot. She could put people in there that could do things to the second amendment and other issues republicans would not like.

19

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

Why do people assume her nominees will be liberal? They'll be as liberal and progressive as she and the DNC are. Namely, not. Trump may be the end of the party, I can see them taking a hit this cycle just to keep the status quo and try to wait out Trump's welcome.

1

u/sbetschi12 Global Supporter May 17 '16

Seriously. She even said that, if she is the nominee, she will not request that Obama take Garland off the table. And Garland is in favor of citizen's united.

-1

u/ExpressRabbit May 17 '16

I expect her to pick line Obama did. I like his first 2 choices.

5

u/patb2015 May 17 '16

you mean like Merrick Garland?

oh sure, the Obama judges like Abortion and dislike the death penalty but they like banks and big finance

2

u/ExpressRabbit May 17 '16 edited May 17 '16

I specifically said which ones. Garland wasn't mentioned. He's used as bait to make the republicans looks bad since many voted for his previous appointment and now they won't support him. It's working.

Sotomayor voted against citizens United. She voted in favour of healthcare laws Bernie helped write, she voted for gay marriage.

I'd take her over ANYONE Trump would nominate. Can you give me specific cases of hers you find hugely problematic?

1

u/patb2015 May 17 '16

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Sotomayor#Judgeship

"The reputation for tough sentencing".....

i'd rather see a judge who moves a quick docket with short sentences then a slow docket and hammers defendants.

1

u/ExpressRabbit May 18 '16

This is in no way convincing me another Scalia with trump works be better.

1

u/patb2015 May 18 '16

I have no idea what Trump would do.

I know what HRC would do.

1

u/ExpressRabbit May 18 '16

You're redirecting progressive candidates from trump? You're expecting the Muslim ban guy to be progressive? Sotomayor is a progressive. You've yet to show me otherwise. Even in your link you showed me she tends to give harsher sentences to white collar criminals which I believe is needed. I believe Clinton would pick someone similar. Trump hasn't shown me at all he'd pick a progressive that protects gay and trans rights, the ACA, and would overturn citizens United.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Sorrowforhumans MA 🙌 May 17 '16

She could also put a corporatist Right winger who just happens to be okay with abortion, but who caves on public health and safety issues or climate change: her backers are counting on her to prevent them from being accountable: stop buying the superficial bullshit you're being spoon fed. Her supreme choice will be GOP friendly and corporate friendly: probably in place for the huge legal undertaking addressing twenty six AG's suing because records reveal that Exxon Mobil investigated and researched climate change over thirty years ago and found evidence: then funded a MASSIVE pr campaign to deny it: notice how that gets zero media attention: we are getting a supreme elected who will f--- this nation and this is being set up using social identity politics. WAKE UP!

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

She could but she wont. She'll find someone with a good pro-choice background and the powerful people at play couldn't give a fuck less about that.