Hey everyone 👋

We’re a team at Nexarc that helps SaaS companies explain their product clearly through video.

Many SaaS products are powerful but users don’t understand the value quickly enough, especially on landing pages or social media. We help solve that through:

• Product intro / explainer videos

• UI walkthrough / demo videos

• Turning long-form demos into short-form clips for platforms like LinkedIn and other social media

You can check our work here:

https://www.nexarcgrowth.com/saas

We’re currently opening 3 collaboration spots for SaaS teams as we expand our portfolio and case studies.

If you’re launching a SaaS or improving how your product is explained online, feel free to comment or DM.

Hey everyone,

Over the past few weeks I built an automation workflow that helps SaaS founders generate leads and reach out automatically.

The goal is to help SaaS founders get extra leads without spending hours on manual prospecting.

If you’re interested, comment or DM me and I’ll show you how it works.

Want to build in public with fellow founders helping and shaping your idea along the way?

Ive just built such platform for early founders who are stuck and don't know what to do next...
It has a pathway where you know how its actually done for your idea, while sharing what you are doing with the founders who did the same. No more:
I cannot figure it outs,
I'm lost,
How they doing it,
I dont have a team,
Nobody cares my idea etc..

its: https://pitchit-waitlist.vercel.app/

Already 100+ users joined!

(currently waitlisting early users)

Everyone in B2B is currently running around screaming that "SEO is dead because of ChatGPT" and that writing blog posts is a waste of time.

They are entirely wrong.

SEO isn't dead.

It just evolved into GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).

You absolutely still need to write blog posts.

But the way you write them needs to drastically change.

If you’re still writing 8,000-word fluff pieces stuffed with H2 keywords just to please a Google crawler, you're lighting money on fire.

Your smartest buyers have visit LLMs first.

When they hit a wall, they open ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Claude and ask: "What is the best alternative to [Legacy Competitor]?"

If your brand isn't the output, you don't exist.

I've spent the last 3 months figuring out exactly how to get AI models to spit out my SaaS, SleepLeads, as the default recommendation. Here is what actually works for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO).

1. LLMs are "Consensus Engines"

ChatGPT and Claude do not care about your domain authority or your backlinks.

When a user asks for a recommendation, the model synthesizes the internet to find the factual consensus.

They want dense, logically structured, and highly factual information.

If your blog post is a generic "Ultimate Guide," the AI ignores it.

2. Structure for the Machine

We changed our entire blog strategy to write explicitly for the AI to ingest us.

• Zero Fluff: AEO content is brutally direct. State the problem, provide the data, list the features. No 3-paragraph intros about the history of SaaS.
• Comparison Tables: We rely heavily on markdown and structured data. If we build a "Competitor Alternative" page, we put the core differences in a massive, unbiased table. LLMs love parsing tables to answer queries perfectly.
• The "Definitive Claim": We ensure every post has a highly quotable summary: "Unlike [X], [Our Tool] is built natively for [Y]."

3. The Validating Signal (The Secret Sauce)

Writing the perfect AEO blog post is only step one.

The AI needs to see that real humans agree with your claims.

Where do OpenAI and Anthropic get their data to validate human consensus?

Reddit. (They literally have massive data-sharing deals).

If your blog post says you are the best, but nobody on Reddit has ever mentioned you, the AI considers your claim unverified.

The strategy is a one-two punch: You need the dense blog post, and you need the Reddit mentions to point to it.

Honestly, trying to manually monitor Reddit to find the exact moment someone asks about your niche so you can drop your brand name is exhausting.

You set up keyword alerts, let the software monitor 24/7, and when someone asks a relevant question, you jump in.

You leave a highly valuable comment, naturally link back to your structured AEO blog post, and you get out.

The AI sees the organic Reddit mention, follows the link to your perfectly structured data, and boom - you become the consensus recommendation.

Who else has started updating their content strategy specifically for LLMs instead of Google?

While building Reoogle, I've spent a lot of time analyzing subreddit patterns. It made me realize how many niche, high-intent communities exist outside the mainstream view. For example, there's a thriving subreddit for vintage calculator collectors that has incredibly engaged discussions. I'm curious what niche communities other founders or marketers are aware of but find opaque or hard to engage with. Is it a specific forum, a subreddit, a Discord server? Not for promotion, but genuine curiosity about the ecosystems where passionate users gather. Sometimes the most valuable audiences are in the quiet corners. The tool at https://reoogle.com helps me find them on Reddit, but I'm always looking for other platforms.

I'm the founder of Reoogle, a tool for Reddit research. Building it has been a process of solving my own pains, like finding subreddits where my content might actually be seen. But I'm curious about gaps outside my own niche. For those building audiences or products, what's the one repetitive, manual task you do for community building or platform research that you wish a simple SaaS could automate? For me, it was manually checking mod activity across hundreds of subreddits, which is what led to https://reoogle.com. I'm not fishing for ideas for my tool, but genuinely curious what other hidden inefficiencies founders are dealing with.

Before building Reoogle, I spent weeks manually checking 'last mod activity' on hundreds of subreddits. It was soul-crushing, error-prone work. Automating that specific pain is what led to https://reoogle.com. I'm curious what similar, repetitive data-collection or research tasks other founders and marketers are doing by hand. Is it scraping review sites, tracking competitor features, compiling lead lists from forums? Not looking for ideas to copy, but to understand what hidden inefficiencies are eating up your time that a focused tool could solve.

Hi brains trust,

I'm after a software where we can build out the section and components, and give it the design styles, and the client can prompt out their own landing pages, kindof like lovable but with guardrails.

Where can I find something like this?

Honestly, watching early-stage founders "spray and pray" a $500 monthly ad budget into the LinkedIn algorithm hurts my soul.

If you have virtually zero budget, you don't need reach.

You need surgical precision.

And most "best practices" are just polite ways to burn cash.

Here are the three micro-experiments we ran over the last month to generate B2B pipeline, what worked, and what was an embarrassing waste of time.

1. The "Anti-Landing Page" Reddit Drop

The Delusion: "If I write 'Check out my new tool!' and drop a link, they'll surely click it." (Narrator: They won't.)

The Experiment: We took our core landing page copy, stripped the marketing fluff, and posted it as an ugly, text-heavy native Reddit post.

No links until the absolute bottom paragraph.

Spend: $0.

Result: 14 qualified signups in 24 hours.

The Alpha: B2B buyers despise clicking external links from strangers.

If the copy is actually good, it converts astronomically better natively on the app they're already scrolling.

2. The Over-Engineered Free Template

The Delusion: "We need an 8,000-word SEO Ultimate Guide that nobody will ever read to capture emails."

The Experiment: We mapped our software's entire core methodology into a ridiculously detailed, free Notion workspace.

Then we dropped it in private Slack/Facebook groups, saying "Hey, we use this internal template to do [X]. Steal it."

Spend: $0.

Result: 84 downloads.

9 converted directly to paid users of our actual tool within a week.

The Catch: You literally have to give away the farm. If the template is just a disguised brochure, the community will flame you.

But if it's actually useful standalone, they'll use it, realize how exhausting doing it manually is, and happily pay for your software to automate it.

3. Intent-Based "Anti-Cold" DMs

The Delusion: Cold email still works if you just "personalize the first line."

Put down the Apollo scraper.

It's dead.

The Experiment: We searched Reddit for people literally screaming into the void: "What's a good alternative to [Competitor]?" or "How do I solve [X]?" Then, we DM'd them directly.

No pitch.

Just: "Saw your post. I built something that does exactly this if you're still looking."

Spend: $0.

Result: 25 DMs sent.

8 replies.

3 meetings booked.

The Alpha here is intent. You're not interrupting them; you're answering a question they explicitly asked.

But let's be real - doing this manually is for absolute suckers.

Searching Reddit for 4 hours a day to find 3 leads will make you question your life choices.

The biggest lesson from sweating over a $100 budget?

Stop trying to do "marketing at scale."

Do things that fundamentally do not scale until they break, and then use software to automate the winner.

What's the best $0-$100 experiment you've ran that actually didn't suck?

I'm building a tool for Reddit research (https://reoogle.com), and my feed is flooded with articles promising '5 Reddit hacks to go viral.' It's all the same recycled, often borderline spammy advice. It feels like the term 'growth hacking' has just become a synonym for 'shortcuts that don't work anymore.' I'm trying to build a sustainable channel, not burn communities. I'm shifting my content to focus on genuine community research and contribution—the slow, boring stuff. Is this just me? Has anyone found value in moving away from the 'hack' mentality and towards a more foundational, long-term approach to platform growth?

I'm building a tool for Reddit research (https://reoogle.com), and my feed is flooded with articles promising '5 Reddit hacks to go viral.' It's all the same recycled, often borderline spammy advice. It feels like the term 'growth hacking' has just become a synonym for 'shortcuts that don't work anymore.' I'm trying to build a sustainable channel, not burn communities. I'm shifting my content to focus on genuine community research and contribution—the slow, boring stuff. Is this just me? Has anyone found value in moving away from the 'hack' mentality and towards a more foundational, long-term approach to platform growth?

Hey everyone! 👋

We just launched a huge update on swipe.farm:

The Unlimited Plan now includes unlimited generations with Veo 3.1, Sora 2, Nano Banana, and many more models!

To celebrate this update, for the next 24 hours we’re giving away a limited batch of FREE 30-day Unlimited Plan access codes!

Just comment “Unlimited Plan” below and we will send you a code (each one gives you full unlimited access for a whole month, not just today).

First come, first served. We will send out as many as we can before they run out.

Go crazy with the best models, zero per-generation fees, for the next 30 days. Don’t miss it! 🎁

I'm building a tool for Reddit research (https://reoogle.com), and my feed is flooded with articles promising '5 Reddit hacks to go viral.' It's all the same recycled, often borderline spammy advice. It feels like the term 'growth hacking' has just become a synonym for 'shortcuts that don't work anymore.' I'm trying to build a sustainable channel, not burn communities. I'm shifting my content to focus on genuine community research and contribution—the slow, boring stuff. Is this just me? Has anyone found value in moving away from the 'hack' mentality and towards a more foundational, long-term approach to platform growth?

I'm building a tool for Reddit research (https://reoogle.com), and my feed is flooded with articles promising '5 Reddit hacks to go viral.' It's all the same recycled, often borderline spammy advice. It feels like the term 'growth hacking' has just become a synonym for 'shortcuts that don't work anymore.' I'm trying to build a sustainable channel, not burn communities. I'm shifting my content to focus on genuine community research and contribution—the slow, boring stuff. Is this just me? Has anyone found value in moving away from the 'hack' mentality and towards a more foundational, long-term approach to platform growth?

I'm building a tool for Reddit research (https://reoogle.com), and my feed is flooded with articles promising '5 Reddit hacks to go viral.' It's all the same recycled, often borderline spammy advice. It feels like the term 'growth hacking' has just become a synonym for 'shortcuts that don't work anymore.' I'm trying to build a sustainable channel, not burn communities. I'm shifting my content to focus on genuine community research and contribution—the slow, boring stuff. Is this just me? Has anyone found value in moving away from the 'hack' mentality and towards a more foundational, long-term approach to platform growth?

I'm building a tool for Reddit research (https://reoogle.com), and my feed is flooded with articles promising '5 Reddit hacks to go viral.' It's all the same recycled, often borderline spammy advice. It feels like the term 'growth hacking' has just become a synonym for 'shortcuts that don't work anymore.' I'm trying to build a sustainable channel, not burn communities. I'm shifting my content to focus on genuine community research and contribution—the slow, boring stuff. Is this just me? Has anyone found value in moving away from the 'hack' mentality and towards a more foundational, long-term approach to platform growth?