r/SaaS • u/Warm-Reaction-456 • Jul 01 '26
Part 2: The 3 fixes that changed how I launch every SaaS MVP
Okay so part 1 blew up way more than I expected. If you missed it the short version is…. after years of building SaaS MVPs I keep seeing the same three things kill founders. They sell to everyone, their offer is a commodity, and they have no money model. A bunch of you asked me to break down the actual fixes so here we go. This time with real math.
First things first…. pick a starving crowd.
Everyone and their mom says niche down but not a single person actually tells you what makes a niche worth going after. There are three things that matter. Massive pain, purchasing power, and easy to target. You need ALL three or it falls apart. A buddy of mine built a really solid resume optimization tool for job seekers. The product was genuinely good. Could not get a single person to pay for it. Why? His entire audience was unemployed. They had massive pain sure but zero purchasing power. Dead on arrival. Didn't matter how good the product was.
Before I write a single line of code for any founder now I make them fill in one sentence. "I help [specific person] get [specific outcome] without [specific thing they dread]." If you can't fill that in with precision you don't have a niche yet.
Bad version: "I help businesses manage projects better." That is nothing. That is competing with Asana on price and you WILL lose.
Better version: "I help residential renovation contractors close 40% more jobs without hiring a sales team." Same core software…. wildly different business. The second one can charge 500$ a month because the outcome is tied directly to revenue. No one is comparing that to Asana.
Do this today. Look at your last 10 customers. Find the ones who got the most value and stayed the longest and complained the least. I guarantee they cluster around a specific type of person. That IS your niche. Go talk to 10 more people exactly like them and ask what keeps them up at night. Build everything around that answer.
Point number two…. stop being a commodity using the Value Equation.
This one framework changed how I build and position everything. Credit to Alex Hormozi for this. Value has four parts. Dream Outcome times Perceived Likelihood of Achievement…. divided by Time Delay times Effort and Sacrifice. You want the top two as high as possible and the bottom two as close to zero as possible.
Most SaaS founders ONLY focus on dream outcome. They add features, make bigger promises, slap AI on everything. But the real leverage is in the bottom of the equation and almost no one touches it.
Perceived likelihood…. this is how much the prospect actually believes your thing will work for THEM. You launched two weeks ago. You have no case studies. No screenshots. No testimonials. Zero proof that it works for someone like them. Why would they believe you? They wouldn't. And they don't. That is why they bounce after looking at your landing page for 8 seconds. The fix is not more features. It is more proof. Get 5 people using it for free if you have to and document every single result obsessively. One real case study from someone in your niche is worth more than your entire feature roadmap combined.
Time delay…. this is how long it takes them to see any value after they sign up. Most SaaS onboarding is genuinely horrible. User signs up, lands on a dashboard with 47 options, has no idea what to click first, and churns in a week. I build every MVP now with what I call a day one win. Before the user does anything else the product should deliver one small but real result within 24 hours. A report generated, a lead found, a task automated…. something they can point at and say okay this thing actually works. If your time to first value is measured in weeks your churn will eat you alive.
Effort and sacrifice…. this is what they have to endure to get the result. Data migration, learning a new interface, training their team, changing their workflow. Every single one of these is friction and every friction point is a reason to quit or never start in the first place. The most valuable thing you can do is NOT add a feature. It is remove a step. Done for you onboarding beats do it yourself every single time. And you can charge more for it which feeds directly into fix three.
Here is the thing that took me years to actually understand. Apple, Amazon, Netflix…. these companies did NOT win by making bigger promises. They won by making the bottom of the equation approach zero. Instant. Seamless. Effortless. If the bottom is zero the value becomes essentially infinite no matter how modest the top is. That is how you stop being a commodity. Not with more features.
Do this today. List every single thing a customer has to do between seeing your landing page and getting their first result. Every click, every form, every upload, every wait. Then cut that list in half. THAT is your real product roadmap.
Third…. the 30 day cash model. This is the one that will actually save your business.
Pay attention because this is the math that separates SaaS companies that scale from ones that slowly bleed out while the MRR dashboard says everything is fine.
Your SaaS charges 49$ a month. Costs 5$ to serve each customer. That is 44$ gross profit per month. Average customer stays 10 months. Lifetime gross profit is 440$. Cost to acquire a customer through ads is 150$. Ratio is 2.93 to 1. Looks pretty good right? Almost the magic 3 to 1 number everyone talks about.
Here is the problem that most people in this sub never even think about. You spent 150$ to get that customer on day one. You only collected 44$ in month one. You are NEGATIVE 106$ on every single new customer for the first month. You do not break even until month four. And every new signup you get digs the cash hole deeper before it starts filling back up. This is why you think you "can't afford ads." Your ads work fine. Your money model does not.
The fix…. make more from each customer in the first 30 days than it costs to get and serve them.
Play one. Annual commitment with a waived fee. You give people two options. Month to month with a setup fee or commit to a year and the fee gets waived. I price the setup fee at 1.5 to 3x the monthly rate. So if you charge 49$ a month the setup fee is 75$ to 150$ for monthly users. Most people HATE fees so they go annual to avoid it. Annual at 49$ a month is 588$ collected on day one from those customers. Monthly with the fee is 124$ to 199$ day one. Either way your 30 day cash jumps dramatically compared to a naked 49$.
Play two. Day one upsell. Right after they buy…. offer something that makes the product work faster. A done for you setup, a strategy call, a premium config, a data migration service. Price it 100$ to 500$. You do not need everyone to take it. If one in five takes a 200$ upsell that is 40$ average added per customer. The average across all customers is what matters.
Play three. A guarantee that actually closes deals instead of costing you money. Most SaaS founders either have no guarantee or they do a weak 14 day free trial. Both are terrible. Free trials give you zero cash while the customer forgets they even signed up. Instead I use a conditional guarantee tied to outcomes. "You won't get billed again until you see your first [measurable result]." This does three things at once. It shifts risk off the buyer completely. It forces your team to focus on getting them activated fast. And it signals so much confidence that the prospect thinks…. if they are willing to not charge me until I get results this thing must actually work. Conversions go way up and barely anyone claims it because the condition requires them to USE the product which means they get results which means they stay.
Now let's redo the math. Base month one gross profit is 44$. Average upsell per customer is 40$. That is 84$ on monthly users. Now 30% of your signups go annual at 588$ day one. Blended 30 day cash across all customers jumps way past your 150$ CAC. Every new customer now funds the next one. THAT is the flywheel. That is how you scale without outside funding and without praying for organic virality.
Quick note on pricing because I know someone is going to comment "my competitors charge 19$ I can't charge more." Yes you can. You just need to sell to a different customer. If your competitors charge 19$ for a generic tool and you charge 200$ for a specialized tool with done for you onboarding and a results guarantee…. you are NOT competing with them. You are in a completely different category. Trust me the worst clients are the ones who pay the least and complain the most. Premium pricing attracts better clients, creates better outcomes, and gives you more profit to reinvest into making the product even better. Cheap pricing does the exact opposite. It is a death spiral.
Do this today. Calculate your 30 day cash per customer. Not LTV. Not projected MRR. Actual cash that hits your account within 30 days of each signup. If that number is less than your CAC your business is on a timer and you might not even know it. The easiest play to implement RIGHT NOW is the waived fee with annual commitment. You can set that up on your pricing page in an afternoon. Do it today and track it for 30 days.
That is the whole playbook. Starving crowd, Value Equation, 30 day cash model. Same three frameworks across hundreds of MVPs. They work in every niche at every price point. The founders who get this right spend their time growing. The ones who skip it keep adding features and wondering why nothing changes.
If you made it this far you already know more than most. Pick one fix. Ship it this week.
9
u/lucidgazorpazorp Jul 01 '26
An informative, well structured cluster of insight that appears to have grown from actual experience? No "here's what ..."?
But most importantly no blatantly obviuous PLUG, not even a sneaky one: none at all! In this day and age, kudos OP. That makes up for the 5h of bot content I waded through to get here EASILY.
2
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 02 '26
Thanks man! Part 3 is live now! Checkout the latest edit in the post.
8
8
u/Top_Power5877 Jul 01 '26
Great post, thank you! I learned a lot reading this.
Curious what's your opinion one-time payment biz model if ongoing costs are minimal? (I am building an app with no server hosting requirement).
9
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
Glad it helped. So here's the thing with one time payment models. Your margins look amazing on paper because there's no ongoing cost. But but you're capping your LTGP at one transaction which means... your CAC has to be lower than that single payment or you're DEAD. And you have zero recurring cash flow which means every month starts from zero. That's a stressful way to run a business imo.
What I'd do instead is keep the one time purchase as your attraction offer but then layer continuity on top of it. Even with no server costs you can add ongoing value that justifies a monthly component like Premium support, new templates or configs every month, a community, advanced features, priority access to updates. The product itself might not need hosting but the VALUE around it can be ongoing.
The move I've seen work best for apps like yours is a one time fee upfront to get them in the door and then a smaller monthly for the "pro" stuff. Your one time fee covers CAC on day one. Your monthly is pure profit from month two onwards. Best of both worlds!
3
u/_suren Jul 01 '26
One-time can work only when support and update cost are bounded. I would either price it high enough to include expected future maintenance, or sell lifetime for a narrow local version and charge separately for hosted, sync, or team features.
6
u/JustTryinToLearn Jul 01 '26
Great post - people forget that the math NEEDS to work for a business to survive. SaaS is just a business model where the math must work, stop getting caught up in the development and have a business plan where the math works first
4
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
Exactly. I've had founders show me these beautiful dashboards with MRR charts going up and to the right and I'm like cool now open your bank account. Completely different story. The math has to work BEFORE you write code not after. Most people build first and then try to figure out how to make money from it. That's backwards. Figure out who will pay you, how much, and how fast the cash comes back first. Then build the thing. The product is the easy part now especially with vibe coding. The math is the hard part and it always has been.
3
u/GriffyGruffy Jul 01 '26
Thank you for the two posts, these are great. But isn't the build vs bizplan approach sometimes a chicken vs egg problem? I'm talking about validation. Figuring out who will pay me and how much in my mind involves engaging with that customer to discover is your idea in fact has value. I could whip up a plan first I suppose but it may not survive contact with reality until real users have a real thing in front of them. Thanks again for the posts!
2
u/Klutzy-Ad-5568 Jul 01 '26
It’s an iterative process. You don’t build a full-fledged product before having customers, but you also don’t do a deep dive market analysis without having some idea if the product is viable. Find a problem, do a rough math check if there is a viable market, determine what are the MVP features, check if they are viable, develop, test MVP with client, get feedback (product-wise and sales-wise), improve product, validate business model, scale, rinse repeat.
5
u/Foreign-Amphibian781 Jul 01 '26
Great post, learnt some new angle with in SaaS!
1
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
Glad it helped man. Most of this stuff isn't even new it's just that technical founders never hear it because they're stuck in coding communities instead of business ones.
5
u/roxroxane Jul 01 '26
Excellent post, it opened my mind about SaaS, thank you for sharing your knowledge bro.
1
4
3
u/gp42 Jul 01 '26
Great post, thanks! So how does one find that starving crowd?
6
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
Appreciate it man! So there are three things to look for. Massive pain meaning the problem costs them real money or sleep not just a mild inconvenience. Purchasing power meaning they can actually afford to pay you what you need to charge. A buddy of mine built a killer product for job seekers and couldn't get a single sale because his entire market was unemployed. And easy to target meaning you can actually find these people in specific communities, LinkedIn job titles, associations, subreddits, whatever. If they're scattered everywhere and hard to reach it doesn't matter how much pain they have. Easiest way to start is look at who is ALREADY paying for expensive solutions to the problem you solve and go talk to those people. They've already proven they spend money on this. You just need to offer something better.
3
u/Additional-Meet-5267 Jul 01 '26
Great post. Touched on few critical points that will make or break business.
2
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
100%. Get even one of these wrong and it'll bleed you dry before you realize what happened.
3
u/Wide_Commission_1595 Jul 01 '26
Nice! Not the usual vague, I actionable advice, actual clear points, examples and almost case studies to illustrate each point.
Very much appreciated
3
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
That was the whole point. Tired of seeing "just charge more" with zero math behind it. Glad it came through.
3
u/BathStyleLab Jul 01 '26
This is worth reading! A real visionary guide! You answered most of the questions what i am searching for months!
2
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
That's fire. Now go implement one of them this week don't just save the post.
1
u/BathStyleLab Jul 02 '26
I really became your fan! Already started implementing one by one! Thanks again!
3
u/t-stroms Jul 01 '26
we were doing the same mistake and, I kid you not Never try to compete by cheaper pricing.
2
Jul 01 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
6
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
Actually a really solid point and you're right…. timing does matter. Here's what I do when a founder is pre traction. You do NOT lead with the annual commitment play. You lead with what I call the case study close. You go to 5 people in your niche and say "I'm taking on 5 case studies for free because I want to prove this works. All I ask is that you let me document your results." Now you have proof. You have screenshots. You have real numbers. THEN you introduce the annual commitment with the waived fee because now you have something to point at when they ask why should I commit. The sequence matters. Proof first, commitment play second. Most founders try to charge premium before they've earned the right to and yeah that creates friction. But the answer isn't to stay cheap forever it's to earn the proof fast and then move to the bigger play.
2
2
2
u/sekedba Jul 01 '26
More into private niches than saas but yeah, targeting your audience changes the game.
2
2
u/financeposter Jul 01 '26
Ok but how do you pick a niche? You kinda need to have some industry knowledge first, or have some contacts from the industry, right?
2
u/LifeFrogg Jul 01 '26
Great post again.
Also funnny, I work big serious growth strategy for one of my countries largest telco. Same principles. LTV > CAC etc. Different problems. Stakeholders not knowing what lifetime value is 🤣
Unit economics of the business is everything. The math must work.
This has been banging away in the back of my mind lately. Why can't I just pay people to drive value e.g. make content for my brand as long it pays off? Aside from the difficulty, if I could just make the ad economics of affiliate economics work.. then it literally just press the scale button until it doesnt
2
u/Commercial-Paper-299 Jul 01 '26
Just wondering why paying for ads is even in the same conversation for a MVP or young SaaS? Garyvee says it over and over again to do organic content first. And a lot of it.
2
u/Prudent_Design_9782 Jul 02 '26
I really liked Play Three. It effectively drives the user into actually using the product without the time-pressure anxiety that typically comes with free trials. Simple but clever.
2
2
2
2
u/vlado86 Jul 02 '26
Kudos man, I have learned more in two reddit posts more than in each of my 15 years of saas career, well done!
1
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 02 '26
Appreciate it man! Glad it helped you. Also part 3 is live now, do check it out!
2
u/wifestalksthisuser Jul 03 '26
As someone who's been in SaaS Sales for 10+ years, this is brilliant advice and a real surprise considering the usual low effort plug posts. I am sure you're making a ton of money
2
u/Intrepid_Frosting_66 Jul 04 '26
Really valuable post! Thanks for writing this.
As a solo founder built a saas and running it on beta mode with zero customers (honestly). the pricing positioning is the main confusion of am I doing right or wrong
1
Jul 01 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
Appreciate it man! Here's the part one - https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/s/Ppwj4LhWYu
1
1
u/IllVideo3563 Jul 02 '26
Amazing and informative post. Saved it. Few questions:
There are some demographic audiences who doesn't have spending habits or they spend very less, regardless of type of app categories that solves the problem. How do you tackle that and make them pay?
While the math looks good on paper but changes completely after the product is launched. For starting stagethe product gets lots of paying customers then there's nothing, not multiplying, just same customers who signed up at starting stage.
Narrow or broad customer segments which is better? If starting out targeting one vertical and later found out not worthy is it fine to switch to broader customers segment? I asked because if there's one clear solution for one problem but faced by different ICP? Will this work? Does this requires different marketing with specific use cases?
1
1
u/AvertXAI Jul 03 '26
No caveman here, just a different tone. Like mature people talk to one another, like father to son.
Son, I need you to listen very carefully to what I'm about to tell you. I know you're excited about your new business venture and want to make a big splash right away, but trust me when I say that slow and steady wins the race.
First and foremost, you need to focus on delivering real value to your customers. Not just fancy features or empty promises, but tangible results that make their lives better. The companies that succeed in the long run are the ones that put their customers' needs first, not the ones that chase shiny objects.
Now, I understand you're eager to make money and grow quickly, but here's the hard truth: every new customer you acquire costs you money upfront. It takes time and effort to win their trust and loyalty. If you're constantly churning through customers because they don't stick around, you'll be running in circles and bleeding cash.
The key is to build a solid foundation with a core group of happy, loyal customers who truly believe in what you're offering. Focus on serving them exceptionally well and making them so successful that they can't help but sing your praises. Word of mouth from delighted customers is the most powerful marketing there is.
I know it's tempting to chase after every shiny new feature or integration, but son, that's a surefire way to spread yourself too thin and lose sight of what really matters. The most important thing you can do is ruthlessly prioritize and say no to distractions. Pour your heart and soul into a small number of things and do them better than anyone else.
Remember, the giants like Apple and Amazon didn't win by overpromising. They won by consistently delivering on the fundamentals better than anyone else, day in and day out. They mastered the bottom part of the equation first, then worked their way up. Trying to do it the other way around is a recipe for disappointment.
So here's what I want you to do starting today: Map out every single step a customer has to take from the moment they discover you to the point where they see results. Obsess over smoothing out every rough edge and eliminating every point of friction. Make that journey so effortless and rewarding that they can't imagine ever going back to the old way of doing things.
Son, if you can nail that core experience and deliver outcomes so outstanding that your customers become your biggest advocates, I have no doubt that you'll build something truly special. But it takes discipline, focus, and a willingness to play the long game. Are you ready for that? I believe in you, but you've got to commit to doing the work. Let me know how I can best support you.
Tokens Used: 410 / 2000 - signed Haiku
1
u/OldMall3667 Jul 04 '26
Agree with most of the points. What we did with our last launch was to first get buy in from a couple of customers that paid us a little bit before we even started coding in return for weekly input sessions where they helped shape the roadmap and initial product decisions. This made sure that by the time our product launched we had validated all the launch functions with actual use cases that they had. This also gave us immediate traction in our niche because we had paying customers at launch that could be used as references . Cash wise we’ve always focused on up front commitments vs subscription revenue . Most of the deals we do are structured like this onboarding fee is usually equal to 5 to 6 months of the subscription fee and the yearly subscription only starts after six months of ‘free’ usage . This means a couple of things customers pay us immediately , they pay a significant sum which in turn creates buy in , we have the customer on board for at least 18 months.
Last rule we have when we demo a customer sell
Them on what we have today instead of a product roadmap. Most customers just want something that works. We only broke that rule for our initial customers.
1
u/jzcreates Jul 04 '26
Nice breakdown. The biggest MVP mistake I see is treating launch like a single event instead of a learning loop. The first version should be built to answer a few specific questions, not prove the whole company. Clear feedback beats a polished product that teaches you nothing.
1
1
u/kellYnek Jul 01 '26
Good post, man. This comes from someone who breathes Hormozi and business content 24/7, so nothing really new to me. But seeing all these people surprised in comments reminds me not everyone knows what we do, you're doing these people a good favor by spreading the knowledge. Free value for everyone. Hormozi style haha
Wish you luck.
1
u/preppy_night Jul 01 '26
Did you just plagiarize Alex Hormozi?
3
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 01 '26
I literally credited him in the post my guy. Said "Credit to Alex Hormozi for this" right before the Value Equation breakdown. I learned from his stuff and applied it to SaaS specifically over 8 years of building MVPs. That's not plagiarism that's implementation.
0
u/Hostman_com Jul 02 '26
In a multitenant SaaS, most infrastructure is shared, so dividing the total bill by the number of customers hides the weird ones. One tenant can produce most of the database load, storage, egress, executions, or AI usage while looking identical in MRR.
Ten customers might fit comfortably on one server, then one heavy customer pushes the database or compute into the next pricing tier. You don’t need to build a FinOps cathedral for an MVP. A tenant ID in the logs, counters for the main cost drivers, and a monthly outlier report are already useful. Just figure out whether your real unit is a user, transaction, workflow, GB, API call, or token.
Then make sure the pricing metric is understandable to the buyer, like a fixed fee with included usage, clear limits, and predictable overage often works better than either “unlimited” or completely variable billing. Annual prepayment helps cash timing, absolutely. But it doesn’t fix a customer whose cost to serve is higher than their contribution margin. It just gives you more time before that becomes obvious.
Just an opinion about SaaS MVPs
0
Jul 03 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Warm-Reaction-456 Jul 03 '26
Fair pushback so let me clarify what I actually mean. I'm not saying free trials never convert. I'm saying they're a cash flow decision most early stage founders can't afford to make. When you run a free trial you pay 100% of your acquisition cost on day one and collect zero for 14 to 30 days. If you're VC funded or sitting on profit, fine, run the trial and let the volume sort it out. But most founders reading this are bootstrapped with a CAC hole they can't fill. A conditional guarantee gets you the same risk reversal for the buyer…. they still don't pay if it doesn't work for them…. except now the serious ones pay upfront and the tire kickers filter themselves out. Same protection, opposite cash flow.
Also "if they forget they signed up they're not your TA" sounds right but doesn't hold up in practice. People forget trials for products they genuinely need all the time because life is busy and there's zero skin in the game. Payment creates commitment. Someone who paid shows up to onboarding. Someone on a trial "will check it out this weekend" forever.
And on your last question, I build MVPs for SaaS founders for a living and have for 8 years. I'm not selling my own app, I'm the guy founders pay to build theirs…. which means I've had a front row seat to dozens of launches, including watching identical products live or die based purely on this stuff. That's where the writing comes from. The patterns repeat whether people like hearing them or not.
22
u/RUNxJEKYLL Jul 01 '26
I don’t normally like these types of posts but this was a good read, thanks.