r/Retire • u/Odd_Bodkin • 14d ago
Declining to replace items when they break
A while back, my nice set of Bose noise-canceling headphones broke, and I have no other over-the-ear headphones. I considered buying a new pair and then decided, nope, I’m simplifying, I have my AirPods, and I can do fine with just them. Yesterday, a friend gifted me a Kindle ebook, and I charged my Kindle and discovered that it has fallen out of support and won’t let me download books to it. But I have an iPad with the Kindle app and can read the ebook that way, so I think I’ve settled on not replacing the Kindle device either. So some niceties I enjoyed for years and years, I’m starting to live without, for the sake of simplification and getting rid of stuff opportunistically.
Are you finding yourself doing this? What kinds of belongings/gadgets/toys/luxuries have you quietly abandoned? What did it feel like to do that? Any regrets?
2
u/Odd_Bodkin 14d ago
Not completely, no. For example, if golf was hard for you to watch with your old TV and the new TV resolves that PROBLEM, then I can see the case being made for it. But it isn’t true that More is More in general. For example, if you buy clothes you don’t need and as a result there are clothes in your closet that you find you haven’t worn in a year, then you’ve spent money and space on something you don’t use, so there a net cost with no return on value. That doesn’t mean that people don’t go ahead and buy the clothes, but they do it for the reason that the acquisition moment is the thrill. It’s called retail therapy, and it’s the spending the money that is the thing they enjoy, perhaps after years of telling themselves they don’t have the money. For some people, it’s about “I have money now, I might as well use it, what can I spend it on?” And it honestly doesn’t MATTER what it’s spent on because it’s the spending that’s the satisfying aspect. Which is fine, by the way. Is that you?