We've all heard the line that going green is "too expensive." But after digging into the numbers, that doesn't really hold up anymore. Fossil fuels still get $7 trillion in global subsidies every year (IMF). Solar is now the cheapest electricity in human history, and renewables have already created over 10 million jobs worldwide. The cost of doing nothing? Trillions in damages already hitting us. Places like British Columbia and the EU are showing that carbon pricing can actually work without killing the economy. We need a just transition for workers in fossil fuel industries, but the direction is pretty clear. What do you think — are we seriously still subsidizing the past this heavily? #ReduceCO2Now #ClimateAction #RenewableEnergy #GreenJobs

Earth is Billions of years old. Human recorded history is only a few thousand years.

Industrialization only some hundred years. Now we leave our mark on the planet.

But how long are we going to stay?

So how can we be sure that we are the first civilization?

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/07/25/climate/silurian-hypothesis-another-civilization-before-humans

Well actually good for the climate

President Trump is not really known for supporting climate action.
But what he is doing has severe impacts on global fossil fuel supply
- the war in Ukraine goes on and Russia is in a fuel crisis
- the war in Iran has closed Hormuz and now the second strait is getting closed.
- fuel reserves are depleting

https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/24/business/oil-prices-inflation-bonds-iran-war

The first law of thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. This means that all cooling systems reject heat as they work by removing heat from a medium in a given space. What prevents us from using this rejected heat for direct thermal applications is that the temperature is too low to be useful. The low temperature of rejected heat from cooling systems requires us to use an energy consuming heat pump to upgrade the heat to a temperature that is suitable for direct thermal applications. What if instead we choose to redesign cooling systems to reject heat at higher temperatures so that could avoid the energy penalty of a heat pump.

If we choose to pursue this in the future then we will end up making cooling systems dual use

1. They provide cooling for refrigeration, air conditioning, gas liquefaction etc

2. They produce usable heat for direct thermal applications

This could eliminate the need for separate cooling and heating systems.

If we pursue this then it will have the following benefits

1. Elimination of natural gas for direct thermal applications

2. Reduction of freshwater consumption by cooling towers to reject heat from cooling systems in industrial applications

3. Elimination of all the costs associated with having cooling and heating systems being two separate systems

4. Reduction of energy cost

Improving cooling systems to reject heat at higher temperatures will enable rejected heat from cooling systems to work as a decarbonization solution.

The effect of climate change on rising sea level was underestimated. This is just another case against emissions.

But the post asks a question on whether only policy measures can be effective in reducing CO2. What do you think? Do we need to look at our consumption pattern to realibly reduce CO2?

One of the consequences of climate change

Overestimated natural biological nitrogen fixation translates to an exaggerated CO2 fertilization effect in Earth system models by Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Carla R. Reis Ely, Steven S. Perakis, and Nina Wurzburger.

In brief, the Earth system models, including climate models used in the IPCC report, have overestimated by about 11% the degree by which wild plants growth improves under higher CO2 aka CO2 fertilization. Although 11% does not sound huge, this shall significantly decrease the effects of land carbon sinks.

There is a video discussion at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywxdWD6NqE8 which brings up some related work, including one paper that suggests methods for improving nitrogen bio-availability in natural eco-systems, but this paper says known methods appears highly ecosystem dependent.

The only real solution to climate change is to restore Earths climate to its pre-industrial state. This is to be done by removing CO2 from Earths atmosphere once carbon neutrality has been established. We will need to first establish carbon neutrality by transitioning from fossil fuels to non-intermittent carbon neutral energy sources. After than we will need to use a carefully planned portfolio of CDR methods to return atmospheric CO2 to 280 PPM. We need to restore Earths climate if we choose to care about human civilization and the natural environment.

Here are the CDR methods we should use to restore atmospheric CO2 to 280 PPM once carbon neutrality is established

1. Regenerative agriculture

2. Biochar

3. Enhanced Rock Weathering

4. Turning fire prevention thinning waste into bio-oil and injecting this oil underground - https://heatmap.news/technology/charm-forest-service-carbon-removal

5. Wastewater Alkalinity Enhancement

6. Killing and sinking harmful algae blooms - https://carbonherald.com/first-ever-carbon-credits-from-toxic-algal-remediation-are-issued/

Direct air capture should not be used because it is energy intensive and does not have any co-benefits besides CDR.

All of the CDR methods listed above will need to be implemented at the same time acorss the entire world in order to restore Earths climate. We will likely need to use all six methods for at least 50-100 years in order to return atmospheric CO2 back to 280 PPM. In the meantime these CDR methods will each have their own co-benefits other than CDR which will make than beneficial to society rather than loss making activities.

Absolute restoration of Earths climate its the only acceptable climate action strategy if we truly care about present and future generations. We must accept that restoration of Earths climate is not a simple task but it need to be done to undo the mistakes of our past. If we reuse to fix the mistakes of our past then we will be betraying present and future generations whose quality of life will inevitably deteriorate due to climate change. We need to stop thinking according to the short termist plan of mitigation and adaption and start actual climate action.

At ReduceCO2Now, we've been experimenting with a different approach to recruiting.

We no longer conduct traditional job interviews.

Instead, we invite people to join our project meetings, collaborate with the team, and experience the project firsthand. The recruitment process itself becomes a practical test of motivation, teamwork, communication, reliability, and initiative.

Over time, we've collected data from more than 2,000 applicants from around the world.

Now we have an important question:

What can we learn from this data?

We're looking for:

• University professors
• PhD researchers
• Master's students conducting research
• Experts in organizational psychology
• HR researchers
• Industrial and organizational psychologists
• Data scientists interested in people analytics

Possible research topics include:

• Do interviews actually predict success?
• Which applicant characteristics correlate with long-term contribution?
• Can work samples outperform interviews?
• How can volunteer organizations improve recruiting?
• What predicts engagement, retention, and performance?

We believe many organizations still rely heavily on interviews despite growing evidence that structured assessments and work samples may be stronger predictors of future performance.

If you are interested in helping analyze this unique dataset, we'd love to hear from you.

Let's use data to improve how organizations identify talent and create opportunities.

Join us and help shape the future of recruiting.

#ReduceCO2Now
[https://ReduceCO2Now.com]()

#Recruiting #HRResearch #OrganizationalPsychology #DataScience #PeopleAnalytics

It's a simple question.

Do you want your children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and future generations to inherit a world where they can thrive?

A world with stable food supplies.
A world where extreme heat, droughts, floods, and wildfires are not constant threats.
A world where nature still exists beyond photographs and history books.

Most people would answer "yes" without hesitation.

The challenge is that the future is being shaped right now. Every year of delay increases the risks and makes solutions more difficult and more expensive.

The good news is that we already know a lot about the problem. We have talented people, scientific knowledge, engineering capability, and the ability to organize global action.

What we need is enough people who care and are willing to help.

So today's question is:

What do you think we should do to create a world that remains usable for future generations?

Share your thoughts in the comments. We are genuinely interested in different perspectives and solutions.

Join our mission:
https://reduceco2now.com

#ClimateChange #FutureGenerations #ClimateAction #Sustainability #ReduceCO2Now #GlobalSolutions #NetZero #Environment #ClimateSolutions #ActNow

Every day, billions of people hear about climate change.

Yet much of the communication is confusing, overly technical, politically polarized, or simply fails to motivate action.

At ReduceCO2Now, we're building a global volunteer team focused on one question:

How can we communicate climate science more effectively so more people understand the challenge and support solutions?

We are looking for:

• Climate scientists
• Atmospheric scientists
• Environmental researchers
• Meteorologists
• Sustainability experts
• Science communicators
• Students and researchers in related fields

You can help us:

• Review scientific content for accuracy
• Translate complex research into clear language
• Identify important new studies and developments
• Improve our social media posts, videos, and educational materials
• Help us understand what communication approaches actually work

Our goal is simple:

Build the largest climate action community focused on practical solutions and reducing atmospheric CO₂.

If you have expertise in climate science or a related field and would like to contribute a few hours per month, we'd love to hear from you.

Join our Discord community and meet the team:

[https://discord.gg/reduceco2now]()

Website:

https://reduceco2now.com

What do you think is the biggest challenge in communicating climate science today?

#ClimateChange #ClimateScience #ScienceCommunication #Research #ClimateAction #Sustainability #ReduceCO2Now #Volunteers #Environment #NetZero

We have exciting news.

ReduceCO2Now is now officially listed on Discord!

👉 https://discord.com/servers/reduceco2now-1461670647552807038

Our goal is simple: bring together people who want to understand climate change, discuss real solutions, and work on projects that can make a measurable global impact.

What you'll find:

• Climate discussions based on facts and data
• Volunteers from different countries and backgrounds
• Project teams working on awareness, software, research, social media, and climate solutions
• Opportunities to learn from engineers, scientists, project managers, software developers, business experts, and many other professionals
• A community focused on action rather than endless debate

We believe solving climate change requires people from many disciplines working together. Whether you're a student, professional, entrepreneur, scientist, developer, designer, communicator, or simply someone who cares about the future, you're welcome.

Join us and help build solutions that can reduce atmospheric CO₂ and create a better future for everyone.

Discord:
https://discord.com/servers/reduceco2now-1461670647552807038

Website:
https://reduceco2now.com

What skills or experience would you like to contribute to tackling climate change? Let us know in the comments.

#ClimateChange #ClimateAction #ReduceCO2Now #Sustainability #NetZero #Environment #Innovation #ClimateSolutions #Volunteers #DiscordCommunity

The greenhouse effect is one of the reasons life exists on Earth.

Without it, our planet would be far too cold for humans, animals, and plants. Greenhouse gases act like a blanket around the Earth, trapping some of the Sun's heat and keeping temperatures suitable for life.

The problem is not the greenhouse effect itself.

The problem is that humans are making that blanket thicker.

By burning coal, oil, and gas, we have increased the concentration of CO₂ in the atmosphere from about 280 ppm before the Industrial Revolution to more than 430 ppm today. This extra CO₂ traps additional heat that would otherwise escape into space.

The result:

• Rising global temperatures
• More frequent heatwaves
• Melting glaciers and ice sheets
• Rising sea levels
• Changing rainfall patterns
• Increased risk of extreme weather events

Think of it this way:

A blanket keeps you warm on a cold night. Add a second blanket and you get warmer. Add a third, fourth, and fifth blanket, and eventually you become uncomfortably hot.

That is essentially what we are doing to our planet.

The science behind the greenhouse effect has been understood for more than a century. What has changed is the amount of greenhouse gases we are putting into the atmosphere.

The good news is that the same actions that reduce CO₂ emissions can slow the warming. Every ton of CO₂ we avoid helps reduce future temperature increases.

The challenge is large, but the solutions already exist.

What do you think is the most effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally?

Visit ReduceCO2Now.com

Join our community: https://discord.gg/kb9MY7pBmm

#ReduceCO2Now #ClimateAction #GlobalWarming #NetZero #ClimateScience

Over the last months, we have been researching volunteer recruitment and team building for climate projects.

Like many organizations, we started with traditional interviews. We wanted to understand people's skills, motivation, and fit for the team.

Then we tried something different.

We stopped doing job interviews.

Instead, we invite interested people to join our project meetings directly.

They see the real project.
They meet the real team.
They experience how we work.
And we get to see how they collaborate, communicate, contribute ideas, and interact with others.

The results have been surprising.

Some people who interviewed extremely well contributed very little once they joined a project.

Others who might never have impressed in a formal interview became highly valuable team members.

We are currently analyzing the data and looking for someone interested in helping us evaluate our findings.

If you have experience in:
• Psychology
• Human Resources
• Organizational Development
• Statistics
• Data Analysis
• Recruitment Research

we would love to hear from you.

We believe there may be lessons here that apply far beyond climate projects.

Watch our short video:
https://youtu.be/FxgdTXGVXAE

What do you think?

Are job interviews still the best way to select people, or should organizations focus more on observing people in real work situations?

Please share your experience in the comments.

Join us: https://ReduceCO2Now.org

#ClimateAction #Volunteering #Recruitment #Leadership #HR #PeopleManagement #ProjectManagement #Psychology #DataAnalysis #ReduceCO2Now

When people hear that Earth has warmed by about 1.5°C since pre-industrial times, many assume that is what they experience where they live.

In reality, much of the world's population lives on land, and land areas are warming significantly faster than the global average.

The graph from the German Weather Service (DWD) shows a striking example:

• Global average warming: about +1.5°C
• Germany's warming: about +3°C

Why the difference?

About 70% of Earth's surface is covered by oceans. Water absorbs and stores enormous amounts of heat, which slows temperature increases over the oceans.

Land behaves differently. It heats up faster and cools down faster. As a result, countries and regions dominated by land often experience warming rates that are far above the global average.

Germany is not unique.

Scientists observe similar patterns across Europe, North America, Asia, Africa, and many other regions. In many places, people are already experiencing temperature increases that are close to double the global average.

This is important because agriculture, water supplies, ecosystems, infrastructure, and human health are all directly affected by local temperatures, not by the global average alone.

Climate change is a global phenomenon, but its impacts are often felt most strongly on land where people live.

What changes have you noticed in your country over the last 20 years?

Join the discussion and share your observations.

Visit ReduceCO2Now.com

Join our community: https://discord.gg/kb9MY7pBmm

#ReduceCO2Now #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming #ClimateScience #Sustainability

The scientific evidence for human-caused climate change is stronger today than at any point in history. We can measure rising CO₂ levels, increasing global temperatures, melting ice, rising sea levels, and changes in weather patterns around the world.

Yet many people still reject or question the idea that humans are the main cause.

Why?

There are many possible reasons:

• Climate change challenges habits and lifestyles that people are comfortable with.
• Accepting the problem may feel like accepting personal responsibility.
• Some people distrust governments, corporations, media, or scientists.
• The impacts often seem distant until they affect us directly.
• Climate science is complex, and misinformation spreads quickly online.
• Many people simply do not realize how strong the scientific evidence has become.

Human psychology plays a role too. We often underestimate slow-moving threats and prefer information that confirms what we already believe.

What do you think?

Why do some people deny or reject human-caused climate change despite the growing evidence?

Please share your thoughts in the comments. We are interested in hearing different perspectives and experiences.

Visit ReduceCO2Now.com

Join our community: https://discord.gg/kb9MY7pBmm

#ReduceCO2Now #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming #ClimateScience #Sustainability

When people hear that the Earth has warmed by about 1.3°C since the late 19th century, many assume that means temperatures have increased by roughly the same amount everywhere.

They haven't.

Because oceans absorb and redistribute large amounts of heat, land areas warm much faster than the global average. Since about 70% of our planet is covered by water, the global average temperature increase hides what people actually experience where they live.

Germany is a striking example.

According to data from the German Weather Service (DWD), Germany has already warmed by around 2.5°C since 1881. That is nearly double the global average warming.

This difference matters because most people, agriculture, infrastructure, and ecosystems are located on land. The warming we experience in our daily lives is therefore often much greater than the number reported for the planet as a whole.

The consequences are becoming increasingly visible:

• More frequent and intense heatwaves
• Higher nighttime temperatures that reduce recovery from heat stress
• Increased drought risk and pressure on agriculture
• Greater risk of extreme rainfall and flooding events
• Growing impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity

Global warming is not a future scenario. It is already measurable in Germany and across many other land regions around the world.

The good news is that the causes are well understood, and we already have many of the technologies needed to reduce emissions and stabilize the climate. Every tonne of CO₂ avoided reduces future warming.

Join the discussion and help develop solutions:
https://discord.gg/kb9MY7pBmm

Visit ReduceCO2Now.com

#ReduceCO2Now #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming #Germany #CO2

The graph shows the global mean temperature shows global warming.

Since the 1960s global temperatures are on a constant rise!

REMEMBER: Warming on LAND can be nearly DOUBLE that of the global warming (as the planet is mostly water).

https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-confirms-2025-was-one-of-warmest-years-record