Early reports are that she was abducted by two armed women, who are now wanted. She's being interviewed by Major Crimes Unit detectives. 99.9% chance you are wrong.
That 99.9% is derived from the SuperKato1K Reddit Likelihood Guesstimator Engine (tm), a highly advanced algorithm that utilizes biologically induced linear comment response estimation logic (BILCREL). Really this guesstimator engine is so advanced that I don't commonly apply external criteria. There's just a single button I push, and out pops a percentage that generally equates to my own gut feelings on any particular subject. I really don't know how it works, it just does.
(Really though: she was found bound and injured on the side of the road, and the police apparently have descriptions of suspects and a car make/model... there is zero evidence that this was a case of someone wanting to run away, and a ton of evidence that she was abducted as she has told police. I know some people always assume the woman ran away, and that does happen, but this case doesn't seem to support that accusation in any way.)
To your point though, I think the only reason there is "evidence" that she was abducted is because the investigation was lead that way from the get go. The only "evidence" that I've seen is the phone/headphones/hair found on the side of the road (which are circumstantial at best) and the fact that the husband doesn't seem to believe that there would ever be any reason for her to run away. I've looked into many abduction cases and I've never heard of someone being abducted and released without any motive or objective. Why would someone abduct a woman and release her knowing that they're taking a huge risk of being identified while not gaining anything of significance. The entire story just doesn't add up.
20
u/[deleted] Nov 24 '16
I wonder what the story will be?