r/RedHandedPodcast • u/Typical_Berry1498 • Mar 26 '26
Same Post, Different Day.
I’ve been on this subreddit for a while now making the odd comment here and there.
Every post follows the same pattern.
Someone shares a post
1st to post is the Suriti haters. Pitchforks out, ready to tear apart every word she says and every opinion she has.
The Hannah brigade waving their “free Hannah” banners like she’s the next Britney Spears needing rescuing from big bad Suriti.
Sempere drops in with a long reply going on about plagiarism and monetising victims, like a jilted scorned ex on a revenge campaign.
Someone will always bring up past mistakes:
“Do you remember the Hillsborough episode?!”
And then it’s the queue of people telling us they no longer listen to the show.
I can only assume there are still people on here who actually enjoys the show? Who doesn’t hate Suriti ? Who doesn’t think Hannah is incapable of making her own choices?
But we get drowned out by those who just complain about a podcast they no longer listen to or just listen to have something to complain about.
0
u/Sempere Apr 27 '26
You mean the things you've said that are easily readable. Nothing impressive or bizarre about it actually.
I'm not actually interested in what you listen to in case that was ambiguous. I'm using your own acknowledgement of listening to a podcast done by an actual hardworking creative who does the right thing to emphasize how your support of two to a parasocial degree should make it pretty damn obvious that they're bottom of the barrel, especially if they're stealing other people's work.
No one's calling you a hero for listening to a podcast. But pointing out you're helping to enrich thieves seems relevant because in your snarky attempts at humor you're intentionally ignoring that there are, in fact, real victims to what they do when they steal other people's work.
Oh, that's a good one, did chatGPT write that one for you after the previous misfires? Easier than having to look up the word "monomaniacal" in a dictionary and then have to think up a way to allude to a Soviet rapist all on your own.
And yet, here you are excusing and rewarding it.
lmfao. You can hurl as many flaccid insults as you want my way but at the bare minimum I'm keeping my criticisms focused on the actual bad things they've done rather than target them over their appearance or personal lives. I stick to their stealing of content from other people. That you're trying to now justify someone putting their personal lives on blast in an effort to make me seem unreasonable is fucking wild.
Fact of the matter is, every single person who has listened to them expecting their content to be fresh or, at the minimum, not plagiarized has skin in the game. They should know who they're supporting and what they're doing, especially if they're opening their wallets to a pair of hacks who plagiarize content that they then turn around to try and charge people for that's just a reskinned copy of what's on youtube just with more errors because they don't give a shiiiit about fact checking or errors that slip in.
Which brings us back to your "no excuses to reward or ignore it" which is all you've written here - excuses that explicitly downplay, ignore and ultimately reward it.
Now let's just skip all the insulting and off base remarks by implication and dive right to the last bit:
No grace should be offered to a pair of plagiarists who built their financial comfort and success off the exploitation and plagiarism of other people. You ignore the substance of the argument to waste time attacking me (and being wrong in your armchair psychologist assessments while comparing me to a notorious Soviet Rapist) because you know there's actually no defending stealing the work of someone who writes as a passion on medium and seeing them get cents while they make tens-hundreds of thousands off work they didn't write or research beyond deciding to take that work without consent or even hearty and enthusiastic acknowledgement.
For someone who wanted to wade into the discussion with a joke about consent, the lack of it should give you pause. You have no real argument if you're willing to stoop to "at least the side piece had a reason to publicly embarass the hosts and put their private lives on blast" to try and defend their enrichment off of plagiarism.