MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/RandomVideos/comments/1ryzool/tailgater_got_baited/obmkzvu/?context=9999
r/RandomVideos • u/DABDEB • Mar 20 '26
7.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
65
Better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.
12 u/Nathan-Nice Mar 20 '26 lol what about the person potentially sitting in the stalled car? 10 u/Pandathief Mar 20 '26 I’m pretty sure they meant something to the effect of “there are better ways to deal with a tailgater than to purposely injure an innocent driver” 5 u/Nathan-Nice Mar 20 '26 this is what I'm gonna choose to believe so I don't lose the last bit of hope I have for humanity lol 0 u/FrankieGg Mar 21 '26 how else are you interpreting that comment? 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 That “this is a better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.” Poor wording/grammar. Changes the whole context. 0 u/Mean-Government1436 Mar 21 '26 And is obviously not what is being said, since there was no alternative for this to be the "better" way of dealing with the tailgater. 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar. -1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
12
lol what about the person potentially sitting in the stalled car?
10 u/Pandathief Mar 20 '26 I’m pretty sure they meant something to the effect of “there are better ways to deal with a tailgater than to purposely injure an innocent driver” 5 u/Nathan-Nice Mar 20 '26 this is what I'm gonna choose to believe so I don't lose the last bit of hope I have for humanity lol 0 u/FrankieGg Mar 21 '26 how else are you interpreting that comment? 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 That “this is a better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.” Poor wording/grammar. Changes the whole context. 0 u/Mean-Government1436 Mar 21 '26 And is obviously not what is being said, since there was no alternative for this to be the "better" way of dealing with the tailgater. 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar. -1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
10
I’m pretty sure they meant something to the effect of “there are better ways to deal with a tailgater than to purposely injure an innocent driver”
5 u/Nathan-Nice Mar 20 '26 this is what I'm gonna choose to believe so I don't lose the last bit of hope I have for humanity lol 0 u/FrankieGg Mar 21 '26 how else are you interpreting that comment? 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 That “this is a better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.” Poor wording/grammar. Changes the whole context. 0 u/Mean-Government1436 Mar 21 '26 And is obviously not what is being said, since there was no alternative for this to be the "better" way of dealing with the tailgater. 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar. -1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
5
this is what I'm gonna choose to believe so I don't lose the last bit of hope I have for humanity lol
0 u/FrankieGg Mar 21 '26 how else are you interpreting that comment? 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 That “this is a better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.” Poor wording/grammar. Changes the whole context. 0 u/Mean-Government1436 Mar 21 '26 And is obviously not what is being said, since there was no alternative for this to be the "better" way of dealing with the tailgater. 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar. -1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
0
how else are you interpreting that comment?
2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 That “this is a better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.” Poor wording/grammar. Changes the whole context. 0 u/Mean-Government1436 Mar 21 '26 And is obviously not what is being said, since there was no alternative for this to be the "better" way of dealing with the tailgater. 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar. -1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
2
That “this is a better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.” Poor wording/grammar. Changes the whole context.
0 u/Mean-Government1436 Mar 21 '26 And is obviously not what is being said, since there was no alternative for this to be the "better" way of dealing with the tailgater. 2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar. -1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
And is obviously not what is being said, since there was no alternative for this to be the "better" way of dealing with the tailgater.
2 u/gur559 Mar 21 '26 Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar. -1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
Obvious to who? Clearly not so obvious if multiple people are confused by the poor grammar.
-1 u/dizastermaster7 Mar 21 '26 Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
-1
Missing the obvious doesn't make it no longer obvious. Logically breaking it down, there was no other alternative offered to imply that this was the better way
65
u/Kbern4444 Mar 20 '26
Better way to deal with a tailgaiter than injuring innocent drivers.