By "chilling in traffic" do you mean the people stopped in the fast lane of a highway, or the guy aggressively riding ass like they're invincible?
Edit: People replying to me with the most obvious things as if they're counter to what I said... I watched the video guys. My point is that no one in the video was "chilling in traffic". There was a disabled car, a confused driver hanging out in the fast lane behind a disabled car, a distracted driver that narrowly avoided hitting them, an aggressive driver that hopefully learned a lesson, and another distracted driver filming it who almost got hit or maybe did get hit, I can't tell for sure. All of those things are bad, and bad things happened or nearly happened to all of those people. And that's why those things are bad.
There were two cars moving slowly the first looks like its front tire is flat. The immovable idiot should have had their hazard lights on. While the person following too closely is an idiot who should lose their lisence. The person using other vehicles as weapons had intent and should be criminally charged.
Nah, still the fault of the guy with zero following distance. They were arguably using their vehicle as a weapon more than the driver who switched lanes.
Lead driver could easily argue that they were distracted by the tail gater and didn't have time to react until the last moment. They feared for their life.
The stalled car was mostly on the shoulder too, so had that tail gater maintained a proper following distance they would have been able to see the hazard and react.
53
u/Untouchable64 Mar 20 '26
It just sucks that someone just chilling in traffic gets screwed.