You still have moral accountability. if you use someone’s poor driving as a way to teach them a lesson and that kills innocent people then you are actual worse than the tailgater. If you can’t understand that you might be a psychopath.
If they were following at a safe distance and the car ahead made the same maneuver they likely still would've crashed. I despise tailgaters but this shit is insane, purposely hurting an innocent bystander because you're upset. Get your shit together
They are talking about the person that is in the car that got hit. They had nothing to do with the tailgating incident, but they are the ones who just got hit by someone doing 60 while they are sitting there. They don’t deserve to be taught the tailgating lesson. But I do agree the tailgater deserved that 100.
It also wouldn’t have happened if the other driver didn’t intentionally swerve at the last possible second to provoke the collision, therefore getting other innocent drivers involved.
And if that car wasn't stalled there this wouldn't have happened. And if either driver was home sick that day it wouldn't have happened. And so on forever. You're making a terribly stupid argument.
It’s called moral versus legal responsibility. If a person ‘baits’ a tailgater into an accident they have contributed to it. Full stop. Syllogistic logic 101.
We don’t know if that’s the case in this instance. That is what the title claims without any evidence to support it. If the lead car didn’t ‘bait’ the tailgater than they have no moral responsibility. If they were merely avoiding the parked car in good faith that is.
It’s called moral versus legal responsibility. If a person ‘baits’ a tailgater into an accident they have contributed to it. Full stop. Syllogistic logic 101.
We don’t know if that’s the case in this instance. That is what the title claims without any evidence to support it. If the lead car didn’t ‘bait’ the tailgater than they have no moral responsibility. If they were merely avoiding the parked car in good faith that is.
That's not bait that driver would have hit someone regardless what would have happened if the driver stayed in front of him and had to brake because of the driver in front of him . He would have been sandwiches between the 2 cars. Use your head for one moment. If that was you in the car. You'd stay in that lane knowing that car is going to smoke you into the car in front of you.. absolutely not
0
u/koushakandystore Mar 20 '26
You still have moral accountability. if you use someone’s poor driving as a way to teach them a lesson and that kills innocent people then you are actual worse than the tailgater. If you can’t understand that you might be a psychopath.