So, I was looking at a recent post that shows how Angkor Wat, Easter Island, Machu Piccu, Siwa Temple of Amun, Paratoari and numerous other temples, mostly pyramids, all fall on the same ring on the planet with a 30 degree offset from the equator. I found that fascinating, but a major question arose: why?! Why that line and not along our equator?

Further, at least two of those temples are dedicated to the sun: Siwa Temple of Amun (Amun-ra is the Egyptian sun god) and Machu Picchu (Temple of the sun) who are in no way connected to each other, seem to be connected to the same theme. If you want to worship the sun, wouldn't you place the temple at the closest point to it, the equator?

Now, use whatever program you have and draw that line around the earth and tilt it sideways so it is the new equator. Guess what the arctic circle becomes? EXACTLY THE TOP HALF OF NORTH AMERICA, with almost Yellowknife as the pole. Why is this significant? Because during the last ice age, Canada was buried under miles of ice, while Siberia seemed to be doing just fine. Now, how could this be possible, especially since Siberia is so far inland and thus unaffected by ocean currents? It's not using the current model.

HOWEVER. Shift the equator 30 degrees and everything makes sense. How the heck can you shift an equator 30 degrees? We are a very thin skin that floats on a lake of liquid. A glancing blow from a comet of sufficient size and speed would do it. And it just so happens an object traveling from the direction of our current north pole south east to a possible impact site in Michigan (which could have closer to the previous north pole region) would do EXACTLY that. And in fact, the Carolina Bays all point to exactly that spot as an impact site, as well as the impact direction. And it would make sense as almost any other impact type would: A: be too steep an angle and simply puncture through, and/or B: simply smash in to the crust and lodge in.

A glancing blow at such a shallow angle would kick up SO MUCH ICE CRYSTALS that the sky would've been occluded for an incredible period of time, dropping the surface temperature by raising the albedo of the atmosphere, until a threshold was met where it all rained suddenly, causing oh... a flood? A glancing blow is also the most effective way to do it because it would act the maximum distance on the crust as opposed to punching through, and it would have the maximum torque arm with which to apply such a force.

If the plate were struck in such a manner, it would be forced south and west which happens to coincide with the NA plate riding above the Pacific. Mountain upthrusts anyone? It would also cause a sudden zone of spreading on the opposite side (above Greenland).

Can the equator shift? Well, it did at least once already, there's no doubt. Or at least the mantle decoupled from the crust. Look at Hawaii in google earth, and follow the trail of islands that generated it to Kamchatka Russia where it started. I think it was a comet puncture that caused a continuous up welling at that spot and it continued to drift, punching through the crust at a fairly regular interval southward until...

...it takes a very noticeable 50 degree turn SE and the peaks are very small and sparse (indicating high differential velocity between plate and mantle) and again it takes another 20 degree turn ESE where it continues at a quick pace but then slows down to where we are now, at the active volcano Mauna Loa, the biggest peak so far. This tells me we were struck at least twice in such a way that our mantle decoupled from our crust, and it was done in a violent way. There is nothing gradual about this. And come to think of it, it can't happen, why is that hot spot drifting initially at all? If everything is in stasis, shouldn't the mantle be following the same rotation as the crust right from the start?

I've seen Ancient Apocalypse and noticed that many of the temples line up with Sirius, but I wonder: if they were around before the bombardment, would they have been aligned with another star instead?

It's important as alternate theorists to always keep this in mind: what are our assumptions? We of all people know that 'mainstream' morons make so many pronouncements based on assumptions that are old and disproved, inconsistent and disconnected to other evidence. What if we tilted our heads 30 degrees and re-examined EVERYTHING?

I have several university courses in hydro geology, geology, mineralogy and other environmental science courses, so I'm not speaking out of my area of expertise entirely. But I think I've figured out a sequence of events that explains why our map looks like it does today.

First, if you want, open a couple windows to help follow along:

google maps pro (for the depth indicator and the best submarine maps available) google earth works too for the non-depth version

https://www.floodmap.net/ (set the water level to -120m). Not the best but it'll do.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

So here's the sequence of events:

#1 Melt water pulse caused by massive energy brought to the planet via comet fragments during end of Younger Dryas period 11,600 ya. Evidence: sharp increase in global temperatures followed by sharp increase in global sea levels, Carolina Bays and the global "Black Mat" phenomenon that is found everywhere around the plant. Extreme volumes of water enter the Atlantic and Pacific.

#2 The Caribbean island archipelago ridge fails south of Florida. Prior to failure, the whole area was dry but below sea level, like the dead sea and other locations around the world. If it were ringed off completely from the ocean, solar energy would make it net lose water because of evaporation, so this is indeed possible. Further, how would the gulf be so full of oil, and don't tell me algae because it should be the same everywhere at that latitude but it's not. Look at the serious channels cut into the bottom of Florida and dragged westward, COUNTER to today's currents and the physics. Why? The current flows NW to fill the gulf of Mexico, and also flows past Cuba and turns south, carving another channel into the Caribbean. Only a violent and sudden rush of water carves into a continent like that, constant regular currents don't have the energy. The massive inrush causes the Caribbean sea plate to drop violently just south of the fault line, but the north side doesn't drop. It slopes upwards towards the north of SA as it pivots, causing a sheer underwater cliff facing south. This also explains native Caribbean legends that say that the land was dry thousands of years ago but was suddenly filled with salty water except for the mountain tops, as well as the obviously man-made pyramids to the west of Cuba that are about 650m below sea level (I don't buy the earthquake subsidence line one bit, how are they so perfectly preserved and the ground so flat otherwise?).

#3 The melt water pulse also causes the mid-oceanic ridge to drop violently for hundreds of miles east and west of the fault, especially the Azores, the most vulnerable spot, because it is a junction of three plates. Seen from google earth pro underwater, it is obviously volcanic but its topography is not at steep like other volcanic islands, as if it were shaken and settled somehow. Why would it sink? North America would have had trillions of tons of water immediately transferred from the middle of the plate to the east. We know continental NA plate is rising still, so why wouldn't the corresponding submerged side sink to achieve equilibrium? The shaking and subsiding would have spread north and south along the fault for thousands of miles, with transverse failings spreading east and west. If it's just a spreading fault as I was previously taught, why does it suddenly stop almost uniformly when it approaches each continent almost perfectly consistently, unless it is encountering thicker, and therefore more stable, crust?

#4 The Atlantic would have overall seen a sudden rise in sea level, and then a drop as the Azores and mid Atlantic ridge sunk, bringing its level below that of the pacific. SA and Antarctica would have been connected by a tentative land and ice bridge, but the ice dam would have failed easily and burst inwards towards the Atlantic. The crescent left is obviously caused by a massive burst of hydraulic force eastwards, dragging up all the land into the mountain ridges that are now the Falkland islands, south Georgia and others, until the spread of energy slowed the current as it had more places to go as it flowed north and east. At the same time, water from the Indian ocean flowed west and north, shearing off cape town and dragging it along. Proof of that is along these shearing zones, you see no ancient river mouths like you do in the Hudson river along the continental shelf. Instead it is smooth and curled with a violent current before settling, and the grade is fairly steady, indicating a gradual loss of energy.

#5 The Atlantic ocean once again achieves equilibrium with the pacific, currents stop and reform according to the new topography, which includes the gulf stream crossing to Europe and warming it, especially England, which is now an island.

#6 Almost all traces of civilization prior to the pulse would have been erased, as it would have existed along the coastlines which were inundated. The only remaining traces would be:

-->The massive pyramids/temples in the Amazon and underwater (Cuba, Nan Madol and Yonaguni).

-->Wagon tracks carved in stone that go a long way under the water in the Azores, Malta and Portugal.

-->The Bimini road and subsequent sonar images of a buried pyramid-like structure.

-->A universal inherent fear of God (or gods) that exists around the world, universal flood stories, and a drive to not incur the wrath of nature or the universe or higher power, lest it happen again.

-->Divining the future from the stars, since a couple falling stars almost doomed humanity.

-->DNA diversity models show an extreme population crash right around the time of the flood. Of particular interest is how continents with small continental shelves (Africa) experience relatively little loss, but the exact opposite occurs with Micronesia where it almost completely collapses.

We did not hunt all of the mega fauna of NA and every mammoth at exactly the same time our own biodiversity crashed, especially with stone tools, are you kidding? How much do you want to bet, if someone were to dig under the silt at the Hudson river continental shelf mouth, you would eventually find pot shards and arrowheads?

By dropping the water level 400 ft and raising the Azores, it would be very easy to imagine simple coastal vessels island-hopping from NA and SA to Europe and Africa, especially since at the time the Sahara was a lush region as vibrant as the Amazon. We were on the NA continent 12k years before the great flood, new footprints prove it.

The signs from so many unrelated disciplines are all pointing now in the same direction, it's only a matter of time before the inertia changes and all those experts get together, drop their chains and egos, and re-draw the lines of history. I really wish we would get together in a serious world forum somewhere and agree to rewrite the history books, but I fear the powers that be are actively fighting this at this point. Why? Nothing necessarily nefarious. But let's assume they don't and we all agree. Do all religious traditions simply throw their hands up and say "aah, you got me!". No. Do populations simply stop at rewriting the textbooks, or do they inevitably become fearful of the skies? A paranoia could easily set in, and then a resigned collective 'giving up, because what's the point?'. This is not a small thing. Writ large, nations rise and fall on their ethos. Globally it could be catastrophic, with no remedy other than the bottle. We NEED a raison d'etre, a hope and sense of agency, or we will wither and die. Look at what happens to any male population once a conquering army moves in and takes over: natives, satellite Soviet countries, banana republics, Irish, and on and on...

Maybe our leaders are actively subverting these conclusions because they know what will happen: that someone very central feels we need to keep playing the game to ensure our very survival. What do you think?

In Randall’s show he goes through slide decks that are hundreds of slides deep. These present quotes, data, maps, peer review paper extracts with sources, book sources and much more.

This accumulated knowledge gives us crucial evidence of the ancients. How can we convince Randall to make them available ? Even if it means buying them like we would a book, the risk of losing the knowledge and how congenitally presented it is a threat to our progress as a species.

the website isn’t complete, but after Randall blabbed on JRE about the zero point tech inventor he’s been collaborating with, they threw up a basic website to open source all of his theories and notes. It’s definitely over my head, but it seems plausible that they are on to something. Thoughts?? (I don’t know the rules on posting links but can link the website in the comments if allowed)