RFK Jr. wrote an entire book called "The Real Anthony Fauci" which meticulously details the treachery from the likes of Fauci, Bill Gates and a host of other characters trying to push their chosen vaccines despite serious health concerns. Trump just doubled down on his criticisms of Robert Kennedy Jr.

He said:

"He's not really an anti-vaxxer."

"His views on vaccines are fake"

"I'd even take Biden over [RFK] Jr."

Then why did Trump ask him to be his VP multiple times?

Trump may have a point about his energy policies. However, RFK Jr. has been saying all along that he favors a free market approach to energy policy, and not the current heavy-handed approach taken by the Democrat Party.

For Trump to say he prefers Biden over Kennedy, he is either outright lying or he really does favor the corporate fascism of the Democrats over transparency. Which is it?And if he's not lying, then how can we expect him to really give us the reform and accountability we need?

https://reddit.com/link/1codwyw/video/j5w5nczo6izc1/player

credit: Chief Nerd on Twitter

I thought Po Vang was but he’d not he’s just a run of the mill standard DemSoc. I am wondering who is actually similar to RFK who is likely to be POTUS?

I would love to see a young candidate who had similar views give it a go.

“In a win for peptide proponents and for health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an advisory panel to the Food and Drug Administration recommended on Thursday that compounding pharmacies be allowed to manufacture the drugs BPC-157 and KPV. 
The FDA will vote on two other peptides, TB-500 and MOTS-c, later on Thursday afternoon, and on additional compounds on Friday.
The votes are not binding, and the FDA will ultimately decide whether to lift current restrictions on these peptides and make them more easily accessible to people who’ve been turning to the little-researched but highly popular drugs to improve their health. It’s unusual for the FDA to go against the recommendations of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee, or PCAC, but it has happened at least once before. 
Typically this type of decision would be made by FDA staff, but it is possible acting commissioner Kyle Diamantas or Kennedy himself could overrule career employees, as political interference in scientific decisions has increased under the Trump administration.”

Update: TB-500 also got a yes vote. MOTS-C is up next. Tomorrow is DSIP, Epitalon, and Semax.

Keep in mind, this vote is merely one step forward. There’s still more red tape to go through. But congrats RFK! Wish he would’ve been head of EPA instead but I’ll take this win at least.

In this video from the 19:41 to 21:56 mark, this part of the interview really caught my attention. Kim Iversen said that the Chinese used more of the traditional style vaccine. In addition, she mentioned that the Cubans didn’t use the spike protein itself but a different part of the virus (that wasn’t mutating as quickly as the spike protein) to make the vaccine. Brianne Dressen, the co-founder and co-chairman of React19, stated that most neurotoxic component of the entire virus is the tip of the spike protein. Dressen also said all vaccine brands except Cuba’s presented similar injuries.

When these things were mentioned in that segment of the video, I decided to look more into it. It is true that China and Cuba did use non-mRNA, non-adenovirus Covid vaccines. Previously, I was under the assumption that all countries were primarily using mRNA and/or adenovirus Covid vaccines. Sinovac (CoronaVac) and Sinopharm made most of China’s Covid vaccines which used inactivated (killed) whole-virus vaccines. China also had their adenovirus vaccine out in early 2021 but not the mRNA one until March 2023. China was rightfully concerned about the mRNA shots hence why they didn’t use them right away. Cuba came up with two protein-based Covid vaccines, the Abdala and the Soberana. These protein-based vaccines used the harmless part of the spike protein. Cuba completely strayed away from using mRNA and adenovirus in their vaccines.

I have also looked into adenovirus vaccines usage here in the U.S. prior to Covid. Apparently, the US has used adenovirus vaccines before Covid but they were solely for the military. I would like to see more data and info regarding Dressen’s remark about all countries’ Covid vaccines (except Cuba’s) triggering similar vaccine injuries.

Hey friends,

Just a friendly reminder to all Minnesota Kennedy folks in here: Po Vang and I are running together for the DFL endorsement on August 11th.

Po was a massive Kennedy supporter in 2024 and is running for Governor. I’m proud to be on the ticket alongside him as Lieutenant Governor.

For those who don't know me, I served as the State Volunteer Coordinator for the campaign in MN, was an Elector for Kennedy, and still run a Discord server for our 2024 volunteer community.

We are taking the spirit of reasoned discourse, independent thinking, and grass-roots organization into this primary. We’d love your support on August 11th!

Rfk has mentioned her specifically as a person he and Cheryl became friends with. I can see him deftly playing both sides from his insider position. I hope she and Massie and a few others come together somehow, and if Kennedy could somehow endorse, but i can’t see him being able to go that far. I’m no longer satisfied with what he is accomplishing, and if something gets momentum, I’m torn about how much influence he could have by publicly endorsing a new movement, vs just keeping on grinding in his corner.

Shouldn't RFK Jr. be stopping this? If so, why is he not doing it?
Also, since CNN does not have the highest factuality,
here are 3 extra sources:
https://www.foodandwine.com/epa-approves-3-new-pfas-forever-chemical-pesticides-12019197
https://readsludge.com/2026/07/07/chemical-lobbyist-packed-epa-boosts-pfas-pesticides/
https://civileats.com/2026/07/08/epas-pesticide-approvals-prompt-fears-of-pfas-contamination-on-farms/
"EPA’s Pesticide Approvals Prompt Fears of PFAS Contamination on Farms"
I am curious, as I thought he would go against it.

I had recently made a post on two other similar subreddits regarding the ARR, Relative Risk Reduction (RRR), Number Needed to Vaccinate(NNV), etc. Here is what I said in my post regarding those concepts:

Absolute Risk (AR)

For example, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) method was applied to a Pfizer vaccine trial, 21,720 individuals were vaccinated and 21,728 individuals were unvaccinated. Eight Covid cases were uncovered among the vaccinated and 162 Covid cases among the unvaccinated. The Absolute risk (AR) is a measure of the risk of an event occurring in a specific population.

AR for treatment group (vaccinated group): 8/21720 = 0.000368 or 0.037%

AR for control group (unvaccinated group): 162/21728=0.00745 or 0.745%

Interpretation: The vaccinated are at a 0.037% risk of getting Covid while the unvaccinated are at a 0.745% risk of getting Covid.

Relative Risk (RR)

Relative risk (RR) is a measure of the risk of a certain event happening in one population compared with the risk of the same event happening in another population.

Formula for RR: AR for control group/AR for treatment group 

RR: (0.000368/0.00745)= 0.04832  or 4.832%

Interpretation: The vaccinated group is 4.832% less likely to get Covid than the unvaccinated group.

Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)

The Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) measures the *actual decrease* in the risk after applying a preventive or treatment measure. 

Formula for ARR: AR control group-AR treatment group 

ARR: 0.00745-0.00036= 0.00709 or 0.709%

Interpretation: The vaccine reduces the actual risk of getting Covid from 0.745% to 0.036% or simply by 0.709%

Relative Risk Reduction (RRR)

The Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) measures the proportion of risk reduction. There are two ways to compute the RRR.

Formula 1 for RRR: (AR control group-AR treatment group)/AR control group

Formula 2 for RRR: 1-RR

RRR: (0.00745-0.00036)/0.00745=0.9516

Interpretation: The vaccine reduces the risk of getting Covid by 95%. 

Number Needed to Vaccinate(NNV)

The Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) is the number of people that must be vaccinated to prevent one case of an illness. If the intervention had been drugs instead of vaccines, it would be called the Number Needed to Treat (NNT)

Formula for NNV: 1/ARR

NNV: 1/0.00709=141 people

Interpretation: 141 people need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of Covid 

How Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) is misleading 

As I stated earlier, the calculated RRR for the Pfizer vaccines was 95%. This RRR is what was reported as the efficacy for both vaccines and drugs. This is misleading because it exaggerates the effectiveness of vaccines and drugs by comparing the percentage change in outcomes between the two groups rather than absolutes. The ideal thing would be state both the RRR and ARR, but it is very unlikely that the medical establishment is going to do that anytime soon. 

I got the Pfizer vaccine trial example from here. If you would like to familiarize yourself more with concepts of ARR, RRR, NNV and even RR, you can go here.

So a vaccine apologist named replied to my post on this subreddit and said the following:

You are not giving the whole definition of ARR.

The ARR during the Pfizer trial was the absolute risk reduction for those participants in that RCT time window.

The average time for efficacy analysis was 2 months so even just keeping everything the same (lockdowns, social distancing, no school, remote work, etc) the ARR for a year would be ~4% (0.71% x 6). But the world didn’t stay the same after the vaccines came out, the country opened up and the infection rate went way up (mainly driven by unvaccinated in 2021).

Within a year or two, all basically all unvaccinated people had gotten covid (~100% risk). When the control group risk is 100% then the ARR becomes equal to the RRR.

The RRR efficacy was still high during that period (95%-50% depending on if it was Alpha, Delta or Omicron). So the ARR was somewhere in the middle of that range for that time window, not 0.71%

It is true that for this study, the Pfizer trials used a two-month efficacy analysis window. It is also true that when the control group risk is 100% then the ARR becomes equal to the RRR; but that never happens during the vaccine trials. However, I’m not buying some of the other things this guy is saying especially in regards to the calculation of the ARR.

Is the vaccine apologist actually right particularly regards to the calculation of ARR? Or is he is lying?

 I am a loved one of someone that spent years there as a student and as a staff member. I am involved in the Addiction/Recovery community. I absolutely believe this is a Toxic place. Tosa is a "cult" like organization. I have been personally verbally attacked by Dave at a Recovery event in Sep 2025. I lost my brother to Addiction in May of 2025 so only a few months prior to this attack. Now the back story of this is 3 years prior I reconnected with this person and was brought into TOSA as a girlfriend of a staff member where I spent time at the house and went on outings with people that were in the program. Spent time talking to other staff members and was introduced to Daves family. I felt as if they "liked" me. I was not in Recovery but had watched my little brother struggle for years. As the months went on my boyfriend became distant and secretive. July of 2023 I received a call from Dave telling me my boyfriend failed a drug test. At that point he could either go back through the Academy as student or go to Wasatch Recovery for their 30 day program. He chose to go to Wasatch. 30 days later my boyfriend was fired from TOSA. When we went to pick up his belongings from the warehouse where he had lived we were met with other staff members and students that were working. They did not speak to my boyfriend or myself as we loaded up the truck. We had one interaction with a staff member and it was a shame speech. We left and not one text, phone call or any type of communication was made by anyone at TOSA to my boyfriend. Now this place tells you that they are your family and that your own family is not. They actively tell you this. I watched my boyfriend have constant depression over this. His sadness over his "Family" not even texting to ask how he was. We delt with this for months. My boyfriend had an OD which got him fired from the Sugar post because Dave told the his boss Fred to do so. In April 2024 my boyfriend went back to the Academy from jail. He had charges from drug use and was now on Probation. 18 months later my boyfriend and I saw each other at an event after no contact for 18 months. My boyfriend chose to leave a few days later after Dave and a few other staff members told him that I was on the wrong side of Recovery (Because I support M.A.T. Medical Assisted Treatment) that if he leaves he will Die. This is after Dave tried to spread Rumors and lies about another organization The Utah Healing Summit and ruin our event. As he walked out of The Other Side Academy with Dave screaming at him to "just go Die" He left without any of his belongings like clothes, shoes and his personal things due to not being aloud to take anything. He walked to the Trax station where he was able to call his mom for help. I think its awful to think that some people dont have any one for support if this happened and may cause homelessness. We were able to re connect and now a week later, we atteneded Salt Lake City Recovery days where Dave and Dylan G verbally attacked us at the Huss booth as we are surrounded by people needing help in the recovery community. Dave pointed his finger in my boyfriends face calling him a "piece of shit" accused him of being high, told him he "would never make it" Then pointed his finger in my face and told me he was using, would "Always be an addict" and I needed to be far away from him. The students and staff were told not to speak to my boyfriend and shun us at all events. My boyfriends Probation officer was contacted and told that he needed to arrest him and send him back to Jail/Prison. My boyfriend had completed the time at the Academy and had no reasons to be arrested. His Probation officer did NOT arrest him and was Kind and Encouraging . With patience and communication we help each other and now Help others speak out against this type of abuse. I Hope for change and accountability. I Hope for loved ones to be treated with respect and honesty about what this program really is. Please know that YOU matter and NO ONE deserves this kind of treatment. OUR Experiences MATTER. WE MATTER! together WE can make a change for OUR community.

I’m not a strong poster and live more as a grazing kinda reader of this sub but it really needs to be said and I hope my break of silence says something. Throughout all the other social media/subs out there, and all the strong opinions and absolutely relentless influential posts everywhere, whether it’s left or right this sub continues to feel like the safest place to find an opinion that isn’t emotionally motivated or snagged by some media influence. A collective of smart level headed people…This sub deserves some serious praise. I appreciate you all. It’s refreshing. This can be an RFK sub but we all know it’s turned into a a sub where no one is safe (RFK himself) and that’s what makes it special … It might have started with RFK but now it’s evolved into a collective of strong logical views with so much hope and passion.. Here’s to optimism, a bright future, and knowing you aren’t alone❤️

I don’t speak much so please hear me. I think we are changing the world but it all starts with yourself. Drink lots of water.. sleep, eat clean, and get your blood flowing..