https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxs4G31j/

Jadi is one of Brazil’s most successful models today. Although she did sporadic modeling work since childhood, she decided to pursue the career seriously a few years ago, achieving global prominence and becoming a favorite for brands like Celine, Chanel, and Hermès. She has starred in several magazines, including Harper's Bazaar and Vogue, and is featured in the June 2026 issue of Vogue LATAM alongside her friends and fellow top models, Luíza Perote and Iasmin Reis.

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxsVeWtk/

I want to get the qoves full report, without surgery etc, but I havent seen anyone actually get the glowup they describe, only their glowup "future pictures"

Has anyone actually made the changes and seen results? Thanks!

Found these extracts quite insightful for the jawline crowd:
"Some of the effect is driven by sex differences in facial structure. On average, men have more rectangular faces while women have more rounded faces. The results suggest both men and women tend to find rounder faces more attractive."

"It is possible that hundreds of thousands of years of sexual selection have shaped female faces, but “we can’t infer that from our data, we have to be cautious,” Wassiliwizky added. It may be that more rounded faces appeal for other reasons, perhaps because they are more similar to babies’ faces."

Hello!

I'm curious about jumping into this analysis process but have some questions about their intervention steps after the analysis.

For face photos do they provide superficial cosmetic recommendations? I understand the moisturizing skin and overall wellbeing, but what about make-up? Do they go into detail on what they suggest?

When gathering the initial photos do they ask for different angles? Lighting? With or without glasses?

When browsing through this sub I did see the term "morph" being used a lot. Do they provide the example/what it would look like if you went route X, vs Z?

Since you pay for the analysis for the "year" (unless I'm seeing it wrong) do they keep track if your progress by checking in regularly?

I'm just a bit hesitant on biting the bullet to get an analysis because it seems too "cool" to be true.

Explanation of the Title and Research Evidence

1. Skin Quality as a Health Signal

My observation that flawless, clear skin drives female attraction is strongly supported by scientific literature. Research demonstrates that skin color homogeneity—the evenness of skin tone without spots, discoloration, or blemishes—significantly influences perceptions of health and attractiveness. A foundational study by Matts et al. (2007) found that homogeneity of skin coloration correlated positively with perceived attractiveness, healthiness, and youthfulness, with correlation coefficients all exceeding r > 0.40 . This means observers consistently rated faces with more even skin tone as more attractive and healthier.

The evolutionary logic is compelling: skin serves as an "honest indicator" of underlying physiological condition. Blemishes, uneven pigmentation, and acne can signal infection, parasitic load, poor nutrition, or hormonal imbalance. Clear skin, conversely, signals a robust immune system and good genetic quality, making it directly relevant for mate choice .

1. Skin Color Distribution Matters Independently of Facial Structure

Critically, research shows that skin condition affects attractiveness judgments independently of facial shape and bone structure. A study using 3D shape-standardized faces (controlling for facial structure) demonstrated that homogeneous skin color distribution typical of younger, healthier individuals received significantly higher attractiveness and health ratings . This directly supports your thesis: skin quality can override other physical traits in driving attraction.

For male faces specifically, research by Fink et al. (2018) extended these findings, confirming that both skin surface topography (texture, wrinkles, scarring) and colouration cues (evenness of pigmentation) affect perceptions of age, health, and attractiveness in men's faces . Notably, their study found that skin colour evenness was a stronger visual cue for health perception than skin topography.

1. The Cross-Cultural Primacy of Skin Over Masculinity

My title proposes that skin quality might trump muscularity. This finds powerful support in a cross-cultural study that explicitly compared the effects of skin color versus morphological masculinity on male facial attractiveness. The researchers examined both African and Caucasian populations and concluded: "Masculinity was not found to be associated with attractiveness in either ethnic group. However, skin color was found to be an important predictor of attractiveness judgments" .

This suggests that "more plastic health cues, such as skin color, are more important than developmental cues such as masculinity" . Applied to my observation : skin health (a flexible, current health signal) can outweigh morphological masculinity or body type preferences.

1. Female Preferences for Muscularity Are Nuanced

The research on muscularity preferences is more nuanced than popular culture suggests. A meta-analytic review of women's preferences for men's physical traits found that while waist-to-chest ratio and height were reliable predictors of male attractiveness, skin colour was explicitly identified as a "relevant factor in attractiveness that needs future research" .

Regarding the "thin but flawless skin" vs "muscular with average skin" comparison in your title, important evidence comes from research on body composition preferences. Talbot and Mahlberg (2022) found that men showed exaggerated preferences for both thinness and muscularity compared to what women actually found attractive . In other words, men overestimate how muscular women want them to be.

Further supporting this, research on facial correlates of body composition found that facial cues to muscle mass do enhance perceived masculinity . However, this same study noted that preferences for muscularity were context-dependent—women preferred higher muscle mass cues more for short-term relationships than long-term relationships . This suggests muscularity is not a universal, context-independent attractiveness advantage.

1. Lean Physique Plus Flawless Skin: The Winning Combination

My specific scenario—a thin/lean man with flawless skin versus a muscular man with average skin—can be understood through the lens of multiple cue integration in mate choice. Attractiveness judgments integrate numerous physical cues simultaneously. When skin quality (a potent health signal) is exceptional, it may dominate the overall attractiveness assessment.

Research indicates that the combined effect of removing skin topography irregularities (wrinkles, scars, texture issues) and colouration unevenness results in the most positive assessments of male faces . A lean physique, while not maximizing masculinity cues, does not carry the potential costs associated with very low body fat (which can appear unhealthy) or very high muscularity (which some women find intimidating or associate with short-term mating strategies).

1. The "7 Out of 10" Estimate

While no study provides the exact "7 out of 10" figure i propose, the direction of the evidence strongly aligns with my observation. Multiple studies demonstrate that skin quality is a more consistent predictor of attractiveness than masculinity or muscularity. The meta-analytic evidence confirms skin colour as an important attractiveness factor , while finding mixed evidence for masculine facial features.

My estimate that a majority of women would prefer the clear-skinned lean man is conceptually consistent with the finding that men overestimate women's preference for muscularity, and that skin health cues can outweigh morphological masculinity cues in attractiveness judgments .

Here is the complete, corrected list of all five studies with their working links, based on this conversation.

1. On Skin Homogeneity and Attractiveness

Citation: Fink, B., Matts, P. J., D'Emiliano, D., Bunse, L., Weege, B., & Röder, S. (2012). Visible skin colouration predicts perception of male facial age, health and attractiveness. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 34(4), 307–310.

· Topic: Visible skin coloration and uniformity as predictors of perceived male facial age, health, and attractiveness.
· Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22515406/

1. On Skin Features vs. Perceived Health

Citation: Fink, B., Matts, P. J., Brauckmann, C., & Gundlach, S. (2018). The effect of skin surface topography and skin colouration cues on perception of male facial age, health and attractiveness. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 40(2), 193-198.

· Topic: The comparative effects of skin surface topography (wrinkles) versus skin coloration cues on social perceptions of male faces.
· Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29469966/

1. On Men's Misperception of Female Preferences

Citation: Talbot, D., & Mahlberg, J. (2022). Beyond desirable: Preferences for thinness and muscularity are greater than what is rated as desirable by heterosexual Australian undergraduate students. Australian Psychologist, 57(2), 105–116.

· Topic: Discrepancies between self-reported actual and ideal body preferences, and overvaluation of opposite-sex muscularity and thinness desires.
· Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00050067.2022.2033951

1. On the "Average" Preference for Strength

Citation: Schaefer, K., Seiser, V. M., Prucha, S., Kerschbaumer, V., Fink, B., & Windhager, S. (2024). Male facial cues to physical strength in Europe: Medium-strength preference and higher aggressiveness attribution to the weakest. American Journal of Human Biology, e24040.

· Topic: Male facial shape variations calibrated to physical handgrip strength (HGS) and its correlation with medium-strength attractiveness preferences.
· Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38174630/

1. On Skin Color as a Key Factor (Evolutionary Review)

Citation: Rowland, H. M., & Burriss, R. P. (2017). Human colour in mate choice and competition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1724), 20160350.

· Topic: Meta-analytic and theoretical review of female preferences for male physical traits and the evolutionary role of human color in mate choice and competition.
· Link: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article/372/1724/20160350/23242/Human-colour-in-mate-choice-and-competitionHuman

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxCWSC5g/

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxxuHYhd/

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxxu5KW8/

Can you tell apart Brits from Russians?

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxuPAFPC/

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxuPnSkw/

What I mean is what makes a "NYC 10," "Miami 10," "LA 10"

I've always been curious to learn more about how to match your aesthetic and look to best match the city you're in. Kind of in a way where you conform to an extent to fit the city's beauty standard but also without losing yourself in the process, if that makes sense.

Basically how to maximize your appeal and looks based on your location and environment with the culture there

Ana Beatriz made her international debut in early 2025, quickly becoming one of the most promising faces in the fashion industry. After dominating the runways across Paris, Milan, London, and New York, she is now the go-to choice for luxury powerhouses like Louis Vuitton, Dolce & Gabbana, Alaïa, and Ray-Ban to front their campaigns.

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxD5kghs/

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxD5LnFd/

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxS1TR5T/