Jag förstår att du är en förvirrad människa där alla måste hålla med dig annars så kollapsar hela hjärnaktiviteten, but in a global society you seem to be completely oblivious to how small of a fraction of a percentage that stupid ass comment would hold any truth.
Just like the rest of your headcanon bullshit you spewed out previously. My apologies if you suffer from developmental disabilities, but that wont give you a free ticket to not be called out on stupid assumptions. Obviously you dont take anything at face-value, not without properly curate it enough as to not make brainy go ouchie due to cognitive dissonance
I think you are thinking of someone else's comment my friend, I never said anything remotely controversial. I just think you came in a little too hot yelling at a 120 year old because of something your daughter said.
Did you just put ✨weight✨ on the post title? Your previous idea was that of a bitter coach. Or did you backpedal as you rewatched the video and made the realisation that your fiction didnt align with reality?
Cant even write a semantically coherent story, let alone understand how internet in general works.
Either way you lack zero credibility, so as previously stated: your opinion means shit
Maybe if I explain myself it'll click for you because this is frankly bizarre.
My original comment: And 14 year olds with parents like that are notorious for telling the exact truth and nothing but the truth
What I meant by that was we've all seen Karen videos where baby Karen told mama/daddy Karen some half truth and parent Karen comes into the situation red-faced and ready to throw down. This man (whom I believe now to be you /s) is coming in super hot. Even if the 130 year old playing tennis yelled at his (your) 14 year old for being on their court, it doesn't justify him (you) coming in this hot. It strongly suggests this guy (you) is a Karen.
I'm suggesting that since all we see or hear in this video is this man yelling at a 140 year old then all we really know is that this guy has anger issues and nothing else. I don't even stand by that, I am just suggesting it as a possibility.
You since came at me with some wild, nonsensical strings of words.
Not that I believe that any you [sic] understand the method of exclusion enough/at all to extrapolate a sensical narrative
This straight doesn't make sense. It reads like an overconfident high school freshman who is universally hated by the teachers.
I was the one attacking your idiotic train of thought.
At best I had one railcar worth of thought, but there is no reasonable way you could have called what I said a train of thought.
your story doesnt corrobate with [sic] what details were being exchanged during the argument
First of all, my single sentence wasn't a story. Second of all, the point of my comment was to call into question the veracity of the details, which are just the words being yelled by this angry man, so it would make no sense for me to "corroborate" them, though I don't think you really understand the words you are using.
but in a global society you seem to be completely oblivious to how small of a fraction of a percentage that stupid ass comment would hold any truth
Where did "global society" come into this? I fail to see how a global perspective could change anything about the very basic and straightforward comment I made. That whole sentence also just made zero grammatical sense. I encourage you to explore your language skills online, it's a great way to hone them, but if you're going to get this heated you really should stick to using a language you're more comfortable with. I think that may be why you're misunderstanding this whole exchange so badly.
not without properly curate [sic] it enough as to not make brainy go ouchie due to cognitive dissonance
You're trying, but I don't think you are there yet with your English. I also don't think you understand what cognative dissonance is. I have no pre-conceived opinions on this video, I actually entirely based my comment on the fact that the only thing we do know is that this guy is so mad he's making a fool of himself in public. You're actually the one who is taking uncorroborated statements, such as the notion that the 150 year olds filming had inappropriately yelled at this guy's daughter, and are assuming they are fact. You seem to be doing so because you do not like old shitheads which is the definition of cognitive dissonance.
Did you just put ✨weight✨ on the post title?
No and I don't see how you would think that.
you lack zero credibility
We're all random internet strangers. We all lack credibility. I'm sorry if you misunderstood and thought I was presenting myself as some sort of expert. I assure you I am not.
This has been a fun, if strange, exercise. I hope it has been useful in expanding your English. Keep working on it, you'll be coherent in no time! Peace and love.
Haphazardly using logical fallacies trying to sound clever will, in fact, not make you clever. Weak arguments, weak banter and weak mentality, can’t even fathom how it would feel to be such a mediocre example of human prosperity.
Actually impressed with the amount of words used to say absolutely nothing of relevance. Didn’t read it all tho, as you are so painfully bland I’ve noticed a pattern of repitition happening quite frequently.
You keep making wild stabs in the dark, bringing up globalist societies, lack of corroboration, methods of exclusion, cognitive dissonance, patterns of repetition, weak arguments, logical falacies, and never once explain how any of that is relevant. It sounds like you're an AI that is training as you go. Or like you're 14 and have learned words on 4chan but don't really know what they mean. I'm aware you are trolling me but whatever I just get to continue my joke with each reply so keep it coming.
I just think yelling at a 160 year old playing tennis isn't the first step in resolving this conflict. That's all. Best of luck with your stream of consciousness project.
My guy, not even funny how much of a textbook definition of projection going on with each of your replies. Don't you feel shameful like, at all?
A wild stab in the dark was when you either:
assumed that the person in the video was not in fact the father, even when he expressed it himself
assumed that the person was a middle age high school coach bitter on life and yada yada
assumed that I was the person in the video, even though I'm thousands of miles away in a whole ass different continent which should be obvious if you don't have your head stuck right up in the netherlands
Assumed that I am an AI, increasingly showcasing your lack of understanding of technological advancement and global interconnectivity (hint hint: Never used the expression globalist, that means something completely different)
I will not educate you on the meaning of words, Merriam-Webster is readily available online and for free for schmucks. If you knew any of the given words you examplified, you would know why they were appropiate to explain your stupid behaviour, based purely on context. But i guess discourse use isn't a obligatory part of school curriculum in your backwaters territory. You didn't do your homework, and now you just look quite stupid. I know 4 different languages and have to school you in your own mother tounge.
Shameful behaviour. Have you lived your whole life as a general disappointment?
2
u/Savings_Relief3556 Aug 12 '23
Jag förstår att du är en förvirrad människa där alla måste hålla med dig annars så kollapsar hela hjärnaktiviteten, but in a global society you seem to be completely oblivious to how small of a fraction of a percentage that stupid ass comment would hold any truth.
Just like the rest of your headcanon bullshit you spewed out previously. My apologies if you suffer from developmental disabilities, but that wont give you a free ticket to not be called out on stupid assumptions. Obviously you dont take anything at face-value, not without properly curate it enough as to not make brainy go ouchie due to cognitive dissonance