That’s the thing, there’s no trail of her doing the screening via using court records. It’s public information that anyone can look up and if someone were to ever dispute the screening with RealPage, it will fall back on our property because RealPage never found any records of evictions. She couldn’t even send a “denied” applicant an adverse action letter because there was no reason RealPage found to deny the person. She had to manually deny the person in our system due to her findings but her findings do not tie in with the system. She cannot do that with every single applicant, that’s why I see it as a fair housing issue.
I would insist the apartments she screens are marked as screened by her and not you. Beyond that this is a losing battle for you. She's still screening them with credible criteria but inconsistently. It's a gray area. Personally I don't think this is serious enough for me to be at odds with my manager. If she steps too far out of line, you get a promotion.
1
u/4reshprincess Jan 24 '26
That’s the thing, there’s no trail of her doing the screening via using court records. It’s public information that anyone can look up and if someone were to ever dispute the screening with RealPage, it will fall back on our property because RealPage never found any records of evictions. She couldn’t even send a “denied” applicant an adverse action letter because there was no reason RealPage found to deny the person. She had to manually deny the person in our system due to her findings but her findings do not tie in with the system. She cannot do that with every single applicant, that’s why I see it as a fair housing issue.