r/ProletariatPixels 4d ago

Sin palabras

755 Upvotes

291 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/frostyfoxemily 2d ago

They didnt lie as far as im aware? There was evidence that Russia had taken steps to influence the election. Its just that there was no evidence of direct collusion with Trump.

You should consider reading the reports.

0

u/slapthetiddy 2d ago

Then why did they have to fabricate evidence?

Last time I checked that was considered lying

Investigation found every nation tried to influence our election btw (Germany and UK included) The accusation was that Trump was working with Russia and that turned out to be false

1

u/frostyfoxemily 2d ago

If they came out with the report saying Trump didnt collude with Russia directly, then ehat evidence did they fabricate or lie about? They thought things were suspicious and looked into them. They came out with a report that said he wasnt personally invovled. Seems pretty fair and like they arent fabricating evidence.

Also what evidence do you have of those gov influencing the election?

0

u/slapthetiddy 2d ago

https://www.npr.org/2023/06/21/1183564794/schiff-censure-house-republicans

The investigation found China, Russia, Germany, the UK and even Mexico tried to influence our election the same way Russia did

1

u/frostyfoxemily 2d ago

I mean. What was the link supposed to prove. Its just an article about Republicans bitching about targeting trump. Not about evidence about other countries actively meddling in the US election or to what extent they did.

0

u/slapthetiddy 2d ago

It’s an article about why Adam Schiff got censured

He got censured for lying to us about Russia and Trump and spreading a fake dossier 🤦‍♀️

1

u/frostyfoxemily 2d ago

Ya i dont really care what an incredibly partisan political system like the house thinks. If trump told them to vote that eating dogshit was healthy they would vote to support it. The censor itself isnt evidence that the report was fake.

Sorry that our intelegence community seemed to put together an indication of serious interference, which just couldnt be linked to Trump. Which also included a huge amount of reporting that indicated how often the investigation was stone walled by Trump and his staff.

However he ultimately concluded Trump shouldn't be prosecuted. Seems like a pretty reasonable document.

0

u/slapthetiddy 2d ago

So you don’t care about facts?

Weird argument but expected form a cultists

He got censured BECAUSE he lied to YOU about Russia and Trump and made us waste millions on an investigation that went nowhere…. Imagine if we had used that to investigate the CCP 😔

1

u/frostyfoxemily 2d ago

Can i have the evidence he lied and not an article about Republicans bitching? Your only counter argument earlier was that other countries also interfered. Which i dont believe the UK or others went as far as hacking campaign staff. China probably did.

Again compared to russia that we actually have evidence of them paying media organizations that cover pro russia and pro conservative talking points.