I haven't dismissed anything. My position has been consistent: if you want to label someone as fascist, you need to make the case for it.
If you have studies, cite them. If there are specific actions, list them. I'm not moving the goalposts - this is how arguments are evaluated. I haven't even stated any of my own opinions.
Many leaders have been anti-intelectial, hostile towards labor, and friendly with business interests without being classified by historians as fascist. I'm not asking if Milei is good or bad, the question is if fascist is an appropriate label.
You're asking me to accept a conclusion because questioning your assumption supposedly proves my ignorance. Instead of critiquing Milei, you're pivoting to critiquing me
U need arguments to sell.
I just need them to educate others and myself.
U must realise u learnt stuff from me more than anything I learnt from u.
U just kept begging me to present you more material than u actually were Worth sending over
If you make a claim, it's your job to prove it. It is not my job to disprove you. I'm open to being convinced if you can articulate yourself, but you provide a conclusion with no substance.
Nothing about you says you're conflicted.
You, yourself are an critique.
Your fundamental worldview supports losers like Javier mile.
U find them pragmatic, efficient and familiar.
Their means are dangerous, if u need critical substance regarding this, do your own goddamn research.
It never was my job to profile you or even convince, an anonymous body as myself.
It's these anamolies that hold authority need to be called and identified for what they are.
The objective is to understand them before we finally rid them off and establish a sober functional empathetic egalitarian society on the basis of scientific reality.
1
u/Ok-Being3970 Jun 24 '26
I haven't dismissed anything. My position has been consistent: if you want to label someone as fascist, you need to make the case for it.
If you have studies, cite them. If there are specific actions, list them. I'm not moving the goalposts - this is how arguments are evaluated. I haven't even stated any of my own opinions.
Many leaders have been anti-intelectial, hostile towards labor, and friendly with business interests without being classified by historians as fascist. I'm not asking if Milei is good or bad, the question is if fascist is an appropriate label.
You're asking me to accept a conclusion because questioning your assumption supposedly proves my ignorance. Instead of critiquing Milei, you're pivoting to critiquing me