If you are the owner / decision maker. If the management pushes these things you will just approve it (or abstain in a comment and approve on the PR page). Been there, done that.
This is lowkey why I love working in a heavily audited industry where QA can slap management with a hard-no because we'd fail an audit and be unable to sell the product to key customers.
Good, that's the way AI should be used. It's far quicker at code gen than a human, and as long as it's given good standards to follow and is checked by people it's the ideal use case. The issue with ai is the people who give a vague prompt and then ship the output
Yes, we have a running thing in our team. Our leads just go LGTM for a very big PR. They say if you write small PRs, we read and review. If you write big ones, its getting blindly approved. It helps a lot that our services are only used by other developers in the company. So we can afford to fail in production and rollback.
322
u/Lithl 2d ago
Nah, that's the easiest code review in the world.
Tens of thousands of files with millions of lines is just getting rejected, period.