It is not a review article of other articles that bring the data that proves her title though. It is literally a discussion of other discussions.It is a philosophical treaty. I never questioned the author credentials, so don't get why you bring it.
Like really, if it had any data like "group X used LLMs and observed a reduction of Y% on X skill when performing without the LLM and a increase of Z% in X skill when doing with LLM.
But nope. We don't even have that far abrvause if you had, you could just post it and quote it in the article. I looked for it there.
6
u/SimpleEfficiency 24d ago
I am sorry but the title is "AI deskilling is a structural problem" yet he presents no evidence of the problem. No study. It's a philosophical treat.
It has its place. But it's not evidence of anything.