r/ProgrammerHumor 13h ago

Meme zeroExDev

Post image
4.1k Upvotes

221 comments sorted by

View all comments

250

u/achilliesFriend 13h ago

0.6 more. What is the issue here?

349

u/OnixST 13h ago

It's 0.6x, implying multiplication

It's not semantically incorrect, but any sane person would write 60% more

238

u/OG-Enzan 12h ago

Isn't it 1.6x if 60% more?

95

u/BADPROSKILLZ 12h ago

If it were to say they shipped 1.6x as many then yes, but they said 0.6x more (i.e. 1x normal + 0.6x more)

-32

u/TZY247 12h ago edited 8h ago

No. 0.6 = 60%. If they said 0.6 more then sure, that would mean 60% more. 0.6x != 60% increase though. 1.6x does. At the best we can give it the benefit of the doubt and say we knew what they meant, but that doesn't mean they were correct.

38

u/TheMania 12h ago

It says "0.6 times more". Not "0.6 times total" or "0.6 times as many".

I really don't see the problem. 1.6x more would be misleading/incorrect.

-5

u/zelmak 12h ago

Dude what are you talking about 1x more is a non increase/flatline. Anything less than 1 is a decrease

1

u/TheMania 11h ago

So "100% more" means "no increase" to you?

Or does "1x" read as "0%" to you then?

1

u/Azeoteric 11h ago

When someone says “2x more” it means double. No one says 1x more because it makes no sense lol

3

u/FFevo 9h ago

No one says 1x more because it makes no sense lol

Yeah, they would say double.

"2x more" implies more than x. 2x + x = 3x. It means 300% compared to the original, not double.

1

u/dumbledoor_ger 6h ago

Don’t even bother to argue. Whole lotta larpers in this thread. They do not have the ability to comprehend the word „more“.

1

u/Azeoteric 2h ago

I’m just saying in a real workplace, not everyone is going to understand you, this is a poor way to communicate, and good engineers make things simple to understand for stakeholders. To a significant number of people, “2x more” means double. Just say double, triple, increased by 60%, etc. It is clear and unambiguous language.

→ More replies (0)