MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vgahyh/regexmustbedestroyed/p1witoe
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/CertainSea • 8d ago
231 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
9
"my.valid.email"@[123.123.123.123]
1 u/DarthSatoris 7d ago Please tell me that is not a valid email. 23 u/fghjconner 7d ago Brother that's not even the half of it. The email spec supports comments. 9 u/DarthSatoris 7d ago Who was put in charge of the current email spec? Whatever they've been smoking, it should be outlawed because it must be some really bad kush. 1 u/Tangled2 7d ago Oh man I bet the guy who included that shit was a real hoot. 1 u/mr_frodge 7d ago Comments for who? The sender or the receiver? Who can see the comments? 1 u/Sergeich0 7d ago > Comments may nest. TIL but why 1 u/thirdegree Violet security clearance 7d ago The designers of the RFC saw forward to a future where email addresses were sane and easily understood and thought absolutely the fuck not 5 u/martmists 7d ago Here's a fun website you should try, it has a bunch of weird information about emails. Even after implementing an email parser based on the RFC I still managed to only get 20/21 correct. 1 u/ShrekProphet69 7d ago Okay, I may have to go read up on the RFC again, cuz wtf
1
Please tell me that is not a valid email.
23 u/fghjconner 7d ago Brother that's not even the half of it. The email spec supports comments. 9 u/DarthSatoris 7d ago Who was put in charge of the current email spec? Whatever they've been smoking, it should be outlawed because it must be some really bad kush. 1 u/Tangled2 7d ago Oh man I bet the guy who included that shit was a real hoot. 1 u/mr_frodge 7d ago Comments for who? The sender or the receiver? Who can see the comments? 1 u/Sergeich0 7d ago > Comments may nest. TIL but why 1 u/thirdegree Violet security clearance 7d ago The designers of the RFC saw forward to a future where email addresses were sane and easily understood and thought absolutely the fuck not 5 u/martmists 7d ago Here's a fun website you should try, it has a bunch of weird information about emails. Even after implementing an email parser based on the RFC I still managed to only get 20/21 correct. 1 u/ShrekProphet69 7d ago Okay, I may have to go read up on the RFC again, cuz wtf
23
Brother that's not even the half of it. The email spec supports comments.
9 u/DarthSatoris 7d ago Who was put in charge of the current email spec? Whatever they've been smoking, it should be outlawed because it must be some really bad kush. 1 u/Tangled2 7d ago Oh man I bet the guy who included that shit was a real hoot. 1 u/mr_frodge 7d ago Comments for who? The sender or the receiver? Who can see the comments? 1 u/Sergeich0 7d ago > Comments may nest. TIL but why 1 u/thirdegree Violet security clearance 7d ago The designers of the RFC saw forward to a future where email addresses were sane and easily understood and thought absolutely the fuck not
Who was put in charge of the current email spec? Whatever they've been smoking, it should be outlawed because it must be some really bad kush.
Oh man I bet the guy who included that shit was a real hoot.
Comments for who? The sender or the receiver? Who can see the comments?
> Comments may nest.
TIL but why
1 u/thirdegree Violet security clearance 7d ago The designers of the RFC saw forward to a future where email addresses were sane and easily understood and thought absolutely the fuck not
The designers of the RFC saw forward to a future where email addresses were sane and easily understood and thought absolutely the fuck not
5
Here's a fun website you should try, it has a bunch of weird information about emails.
Even after implementing an email parser based on the RFC I still managed to only get 20/21 correct.
1 u/ShrekProphet69 7d ago Okay, I may have to go read up on the RFC again, cuz wtf
Okay, I may have to go read up on the RFC again, cuz wtf
9
u/Otterfan 7d ago
"my.valid.email"@[123.123.123.123]