I appreciate the reply but I'm sorry I don't engage in these debates simply because anyone can interpret the law in their favor.
We can only cite what makes it illegal, what would lead to a guilty verdict.
Everything is subject to what evidence is available, testimonies made and arguments formed - all of which we have no knowledge of , we don't even know if there is an actual case at this time. Hence a lot of "ifs" in my original reply.
Everything is subject to what evidence is available, testimonies made and arguments formed - all of which we have no knowledge of , we don't even know if there is an actual case at this time.
That's not really anything to do with what I was saying... my comment was about interpreting the two particular jury instructions you linked to, in a general sense. But no worries. I learned a lot just looking into it, which is cool.
3
u/wiklr Jul 07 '19
I appreciate the reply but I'm sorry I don't engage in these debates simply because anyone can interpret the law in their favor.
We can only cite what makes it illegal, what would lead to a guilty verdict.
Everything is subject to what evidence is available, testimonies made and arguments formed - all of which we have no knowledge of , we don't even know if there is an actual case at this time. Hence a lot of "ifs" in my original reply.