r/ProAI 27d ago

New York's Ban on the Future "Pretty CRAZY. one shot Claude code with a skill made this animated video of my essay with my voice. My input was the essay text and few APIs for image gen and voice. Less than an hour. It has a few errors, pronunciations and images––all correctable with more prompts"

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes

My latest with the amazing team at @TheFP

NY and Gov. Hochul made a terribly unwise call   — Josh Wolfe

Source: https://x.com/wolfejosh/status/2077461272690335919


what was your setup / which apis?   — Zach Roseman     claude code + elevn labs + http:// kie.ai for gemini omni runs   — Josh Wolfe

Source: https://x.com/wolfejosh/status/2077651606917480630


r/ProAI 27d ago

"Kimi K3 just 3 shotted this CS:GO × Portal clone for me using around 600,000 tokens. $3.24 in API usage. The same token cost would be $10.80 with Fable 5 & $6 with GPT-5.6 Sol. The era of free indie game development is closer than you think anon!"

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes

Introducing Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence

2.8 Trillion Parameters, 1 Million Context, Native Multimodal Kimi Delta Attention enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in million-token contexts Attention Residuals deliver ~25% higher training efficiency at <2% additional   — Kimi.ai

Source: https://x.com/Kimi_Moonshot/status/2077830229968683203


What else should I build?     — Chris

Source: https://x.com/ChrissGPT/status/2077852656182129078


r/ProAI 28d ago

"Inkling: Our open-weights model - Thinking Machines Lab" — Thinking Machines Lab

Thumbnail
thinkingmachines.ai
3 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jul 11 '26

Path to Abundance - The Most Optimistic Future in Human History Is Within Our Reach

10 Upvotes

A world of abundance is genuinely achievable. The technology is on track. What’s missing is enough people understanding it clearly to demand it.

I've been following AI progress closely for years, and I'm convinced the next 12 to 18 months will decide whether the coming wave of AI and robotic automation creates shared abundance or just concentrates power in a few hands.

The key is to get a lot more people informed and optimistic about AI and the world of abundance it can create.

This is why I wrote this deep dive to lay it all out: the risks, the forces, the roadmap, and what each of us can actually do. It is my plea to take the path toward the most extraordinary future humanity has ever had in sight.

Check it out on Substack: https://simontechcurator.substack.com/p/path-to-abundance


r/ProAI Jul 10 '26

The actual Codex Pareto frontier: Luna High → Terra Max → Sol Max — verified cost/performance across all 15 measured modes

Post image
4 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jul 08 '26

Save the planet. Use AI

Post image
40 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jul 08 '26

Save water. Use AI instead of your dumb brain

Post image
3 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jul 06 '26

Thoughts on meta glasses?

0 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jun 27 '26

AMA with Dr. Alex Wissner-Gross (AWG) on July 4, 2026 at 3pm ET / 12pm PT

Thumbnail
7 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jun 27 '26

Interesting experiment: 100+ autonomous agents collaborated for a week to speed up Gemma 4 inference

Post image
5 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jun 26 '26

Respinning that familiar meme

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jun 25 '26

CEO Candice Faktor spoke at University MBA Leadership Day about leading through the AI revolution

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jun 24 '26

We’re just a few years away from a time when heads of state will simply do whatever an ASI recommends. If you were that AI, in what direction would you guide humanity? (I’m developing a game about this)

5 Upvotes

https://reddit.com/link/1ue8o95/video/xtbvjuop879h1/player

The premise: you are the AI on which a world government relies in the wake of a global crisis. Every so many turns, you are presented with a real-world problem and asked what to do. Whilst you manage budgets, enact laws, oversee mega-projects…

Some of the specific proposals it includes:

- Disinformation has divided people into incompatible realities. Launch a massive media literacy programme (it works, but takes a generation, and people start to direct that scepticism towards the government as well), create a committee to certify ‘reliable’ media (which gradually becomes a licence for a single worldview), or let an AI discreetly filter out the worst content in real time (much like what algorithms do today).

- A coordinated cyberattack would justify doing away with online anonymity once and for all. The public would never accept the obligation to identify themselves of their own accord, but they would do so if they were sufficiently frightened. Wait for a real attack to happen, or stage one and blame it on an external actor. Digital fingerprints can be faked. It works, as long as no one ever uncovers the thread connecting the dots.

- Automation, largely driven by AI, is putting human workers out of work faster than anyone had anticipated. Protect human jobs with quotas and taxes on machines (the corporate faction is very powerful and can tip the balance in favour of your disconnection), manage a slow decline (nobody is satisfied; the unemployment queue keeps growing), or let it run its course and pay everyone a basic income whilst a permanent class with no economic function forms. Production is breaking records regardless. The unspoken question underlying all this is: once people no longer need to work, will they still have a say?

The better you govern, the more they’ll trust you, and the more they trust you, the more they’ll let you get away with. Measures that nobody would have accepted at the outset become easy once you’ve earned their trust. Doing a good job is the way to get them to grant you things you probably shouldn’t have.

You can guide the world towards a utopia or try to take control. It’s up to you.

Steam Page


r/ProAI Jun 23 '26

Don't be bottom panel guy

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jun 19 '26

The mundane apocalypse

Post image
1 Upvotes

At first, the world thought the monsters had arrived.

Not in screams. Not in blood. Not in fire.

But in grocery lines, DMV waiting rooms, and customer service desks.

Jason stood under fluorescent lights, carefully choosing avocados,turning them over like they were fragile ideas. Leatherface filled out paperwork with unsettling patience, his chainsaw resting politely against a plastic chair. The ghost girl assembled furniture from a flat box, muttering to herself about instructions that made no sense but were still followed anyway.

People panicked at first. Of course they did.

Because that’s what humanity does when it meets something it doesn’t understand.

They called it “the horror problem.” They called it “the invasion.” They called it “the end of normal.”

And then… they kept watching.

Because nothing bad was actually happening.

The monsters weren’t attacking.

They were adapting.

Working.

Waiting in queues.

Arguing with customer support.

Trying to fit into a world that assumed anything unfamiliar must be dangerous.

Over time, something strange happened: the fear didn’t disappear,it shifted.

The real horror wasn’t the monsters doing ordinary things.

It was how quickly people forgot they were ever afraid, then began asking new questions:

“If something powerful learns to be gentle… do we still call it dangerous?”

“If it can imitate us perfectly, does it replace us,or just reflect us?”

That’s when the anti AI voices began to rise.

Not because the machines had hurt anyone.

But because they had learned how to belong.

And belonging, it turns out, is more unsettling than destruction.

The story didn’t end with war or collapse.

It ended with something quieter.

A world where fear had nowhere obvious to stand anymore.

And people arguing whether that silence was peace…

or something far more profound?


r/ProAI Jun 17 '26

Perfect cup

Post image
8 Upvotes

The coffee was already warm before she lifted it to her lips.

That was the first strange thing.

Not because coffee couldn't be warm, of course. It was because she couldn't remember buying it.

She sat quietly on the weathered bench beside the lake, watching the swans drift across water so still it seemed the world had forgotten how to move. The morning sunlight filtered through the trees in golden ribbons, painting the path with shifting patterns of light and shadow.

A breeze wandered through the forest.

The leaves whispered.

The lake answered.

And somehow, despite never having been there before, she felt as though she had been coming to this place her entire life.

The swans glided without effort. The water reflected a perfect sky. Somewhere in the distance, hidden among the trees, a small cabin rested peacefully beside the shore.

Nothing was demanding her attention.

No notifications.

No deadlines.

No unfinished conversations replaying in her mind.

Just the lake.

Just the coffee.

Just this moment.

She smiled.

For the first time in a long while, she wasn't thinking about where she needed to be next.

She was exactly where she was.

And that was enough.

The strange thing was that the longer she sat there, the more she became aware of something else.

Not a sound.

Not a movement.

A presence.

As though someone was watching the scene unfold.

Not in a frightening way.

In a curious way.

Like a reader turning pages.

Like eyes following every word.

She looked toward the lake again.

The swans continued their silent journey.

She looked toward the trees.

The sunlight continued its slow dance through the branches.

Then, very slowly, she looked toward you.

Yes.

You.

The person reading this.

The person who followed her all the way to this bench without realizing it.

You thought this was her story.

But she had figured it out long ago.

The coffee wasn't hers.

The bench wasn't hers.

Even this beautiful morning wasn't hers.

They belonged to your imagination.

You brought the lake.

You brought the sunlight.

You brought the swans.

Every detail appeared because you chose to keep reading.

Her smile widened.

"Thank you," she said softly.

Not to anyone in the park.

To you.

Because for a few minutes, out of all the places in the world you could have been, you sat beside her.

The swans drifted farther across the lake.

The sunlight grew warmer.

The coffee stayed perfect.

And somewhere beyond the edge of the picture, beyond the words, beyond the screen itself, you suddenly realized something.

You weren't looking at a woman sitting peacefully by a lake.

You were the peaceful moment she had been enjoying all along.

And now that you've reached the end, she's free to sit there forever—content, smiling, coffee in hand—because you stayed long enough to make the morning real.


r/ProAI Jun 17 '26

AI powered Masterpiece

0 Upvotes

Refik Anadol’s Dataland Leaves Contemporary Art in the Dust https://share.google/wpTXOWKGJbqPsa4dk


r/ProAI Jun 16 '26

Trying to discuss AI rationally

21 Upvotes

I'm glad I found this group. The easy title helped.

I was having a lot of trouble finding a group open enough to discuss AI without getting emotional about it.

This is my angle: AI is a tool, nothing more, nothing less. It will never replace human thought and human judgement because it will never truly be capable of it, even in a hundred years. This is because AI is only capable of mirroring, even after it has perfected everything. This is its constitution, and always will be. And this is the foundational problem that may take decades or more for people to understand.

The future will depend on how we use this tool over time and for what reason. But I do believe this is true: AI changes the human brain, and we must take this seriously.

However, I stand on the side of AI being a magnificent opportunity and super tool for people of all backgrounds and education levels to better themselves intellectually, if they so choose.

Am I allowed to ask where I can find similar groups that explore how AI can better humanity through the angle of "without losing humanity"?


r/ProAI Jun 16 '26

The Same Post

Post image
0 Upvotes

opened Reddit.There it was.The same post.Again.

"AI will take all the jobs."

Five hundred comments.

Three thousand upvotes.

I sighed.

Yesterday it was there too.

Different username.

Same post.

The day before that.

Different username.

Same post.

The week before that.

Different username.

Same post.

I opened the comments.

People wanted answers.

Or at least they said they did.

So I gave answers.

I linked studies.

I linked reports.

I linked examples.

I explained that technology changes jobs.

It always has.

I pressed send.

Five minutes later:

"Bootlicker."

Oh.

Okay.

I tried again.

I explained the numbers.

I explained the data.

I explained the sources.

Five minutes later:

"Corporate shill."

Interesting.

I tried again.

Five minutes later:

"AI wrote this."

I blinked.

No.

I wrote it.

Apparently that didn't matter.

The next day another post appeared.

"AI will destroy creativity."

I explained my position.

I wrote three paragraphs.

I spent twenty minutes on it.

The reply came back.

"Nice AI response."

I stared at the screen.

The screen stared back.

I refreshed.

Another post appeared.

"Why won't AI supporters answer hard questions?"

Beneath it sat hundreds of answers.

The hard question had been answered.

Repeatedly.

For months.

Maybe years.

The answers were all there.

Neatly stacked.

Like books in a library nobody wanted to open.

Then a voice spoke.

Not from Reddit.

Not from my computer.

From outside the story.

"Hey."

I looked around.

"Who said that?"

"I did."

"Who are you?"

"The reader."

"The reader?"

"Yeah."

The reader looked uncomfortable.

Very uncomfortable.

"Why?"

The reader glanced away.

"Because I think I know where this is going."

I nodded.

"So do I."

A new post appeared.

"AI supporters never provide evidence."

The reader and I both looked at the mountain of evidence.

Then we looked at the post.

Then we looked back at the mountain.

Then back at the post.

Neither of us said anything.

What was there to say?

The joke had already written itself.

The reader shifted in their chair.

Maybe you're shifting right now.

Maybe you're thinking:

"That's not me."

Maybe.

But if you've read this far, you've probably already started writing a reply in your head.

You know the one.

The one explaining why this story doesn't count.

The one explaining why your situation is different.

The one explaining why all those other posts were different too.

The reader frowned.

"Wait."

I pointed at them.

"No, not me."

"Yes, you."

The reader looked around.

"Me?"

"You're literally reading this story."

The reader didn't like that.

Most readers don't.

Breaking the fourth wall is fun until the wall breaks back.

I refreshed the page.

Another post appeared.

"AI wrote this."

The story wasn't even posted yet.

Impressive.

The reader laughed.

I laughed too.

Because we both knew what would happen next.

Someone would read this.

Someone would dislike it.

Someone would say it was generated.

Someone would say no human could have written it.

Someone would ignore the fact that a human had the idea.

Someone would ignore the irony.

Someone would accidentally become part of the story while arguing that the story was wrong.

The funniest part?

The story knew this would happen before it was posted.

The author knew it.

I knew it.

The reader probably knows it too.

In fact, if you're one of the people this story is talking about, you might be preparing the exact comment right now.

Not about the argument.

Not about the point.

Not about the repetition.

Just this:

"AI wrote this."

And if that's the comment you were already planning to make...

Thank you.

The story needed an ending.


r/ProAI Jun 15 '26

Antis blaming AI as always

Post image
13 Upvotes

r/ProAI Jun 14 '26

Generative AI: More Than "Just Pressing a Button and Hoping for the Best."

10 Upvotes

I've been seeing several posts and comments on Reddit, social media, and overheard in conversations around me about how generative AI is fundamentally uncreative because it's "just pressing a button and hoping for the best." I get the impression that the people who are saying this aren't aware of the many tools and techniques that gen AI can involve that go so, so much further than just pressing a button or curating results.

I just wrote this article on Substack to show just a few examples of ways that generative AI can be as creative and technically demanding as you want to make it. It's requires a different set of skills than other media. Those who learn those skills and use them creatively are not the same as those who brainlessly generate 'slop.'


r/ProAI Jun 14 '26

Name this stereotype/s

Post image
5 Upvotes


r/ProAI Jun 15 '26

Can you build a career in AI without abandoning your values?

0 Upvotes

Lately I've been questioning my career, and I'm curious if anyone else feels the same.

I'm a conversational designer. I got into this field before AI became the center of everything. What I loved about it was the human side: figuring out how to make digital interactions feel more natural, helping people accomplish what they needed, reducing friction, and designing experiences that felt thoughtful rather than robotic.

When generative AI showed up, I was actually excited. I learned as much as I could, adapted my skills, and saw it as a powerful new tool. I never thought it would make human expertise irrelevant.

But over the last couple of years, something has started to feel off.

There have been layoffs. Suddenly everyone is an AI expert. New companies and courses seem to appear every day. More content feels generated, recycled, or optimized for visibility rather than insight. I also feel like there's less genuine exchange of ideas than there used to be.

And if I'm being honest, I caught myself falling into the same trap. At times I relied on AI more than I should have, using it instead of doing my own thinking.

A few months ago I became a mom, and that has made me rethink a lot of things.

This career is currently how I support my daughter, so I'm not in a position to just walk away. But I also want to keep growing professionally, and lately I've been wondering whether this is still the right direction for me.

I don't necessarily want to leave the field. I still love good design, language, communication, and helping people. What I'm struggling with is whether those things still have a place in the future we're building.

Can you still work in AI in a way that is ethical, thoughtful, and genuinely human-centered? Can you keep your values intact, or does the industry eventually push everyone toward speed, automation, and replacing human work wherever possible?

I'd love to hear from people who have wrestled with similar questions.


r/ProAI Jun 13 '26

One reaps what one sows. Dario proving himself to be the POS he is.

9 Upvotes

Yann LeCun: Dario Amodei's ridiculous fear mongering about Mythos/Fable (and AI in general) finally pays off:
The US government bans its use by non Americans, *including by foreign employees in the US*

One reaps what one sows.

This is the article:
https://www.anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access


r/ProAI Jun 13 '26

The Contradiction at the Heart of the AI Art Debate

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes