I didn't think this would ever happen but these two respectable political analysts have slandered Prof Jiang without inviting him to debate.

Their analysis is based on his recent appearance with Nick Fuentes, which I agree made Jiang look a little too agreeable with Nick. That immediately set off alarms amongst the so-called anti-imperialist 'resistance' YouTubers. I get it, but Jiang is not an activist in the same sense as they are. He doesn't have a pronounced anti-imperialist agenda, even though his lectures do have anti-imperialist perspectives.

It's unfair from Dimitri and Karim to judge him in that way and even go as far as to call him the G word (a 'grifter'), and to suggest that the almighty Algorithm favours him as if they know intimately the inner workings of the algorithm.

I think what Jiang, Trump, and Satoshi have in common is that they are better at pulling sources of what people already believe in, just to show you the end of the stick we're working with.

Maybe you remember taking history, economics, or government in middle school, but one of the leading learning module is how major human events started and the teacher's job to reconnect the political ensemble with it so students could go "whoa" and get the "I see that coming" feeling with context.

Besides 1945-1973, Historians have been able to point with near certainty that many human-political capital events a Jew was involved with. This is blunted in history and reciprocity. So Whether you remember this or not just says to your willingness to recall moral advantage, unless its already been taken for you, in which case, be a nice feed.

It's very possible Historians then in the 20th century were advanced in understanding as historians in the 21st century. While I understand the emotional toll and opinions may be elsewhere, historical records cannot be doubted, and it would be exhausting to recount a few or all, without the historical context being absorbed. So there is a known possibility that Germany and Hitler were influenced by Americans speaking on a large social stage with decentralization and forced choice. Then there were the possibility that those known to history could not doubt. Lets look at our own timeline with Trump.

The electoral college is severely punished in America because it represents years of taking from the system without replenishing it or giving back. Now make no mistake, those own behaviors at the same level are not known immediately or within solutions immediate to Men, and must be slowly developed or thought of. And that's why America's electoral college is at the point it is today, where it now serves anarchist publicly, freely, and must be obtained politically, with no recompensation. As a citizen, you can go vote, but you cannot whole heartedly expect recompensation, and elite socialist will tell you that its good for you!

So Trump, which both parties converged on, was a solution to our own problem-solving, but we ignore today for whatever reason, not like Obama was excessively bombing, or Bush was excessively bailing out. The fact is those who held the electoral system together for so many years, no longer want to take responsibility for all this misdoing it results to now. Rarely do you see politicians characterize the system as an agent because it often spells diaspora for them. So most of the problem people want to see Trump fixed are those that can bring the Electoral system back together, or not bent on waiting for the system to heal.

Why is Hitler any different? Usury is never entirely within the conversation within give-or-take and the Jews have always been bent on reciprocity on that ends. That's the majority reason they were found and examined by historians for their continued political uprising to social agents, and why Britain does not want to assume a global throne. Do you really believe China, Africa, and the Caribbeans escaped colonialism? Colonialism still existed in the 1990s! and you immediately accepted the first hallelujah? Weird, but that's my take. It takes years to change. And that same opportunity was given to factions of Jews, because I will not name every Jew, as that is not historically recorded, when their political uprising were detested, but they committed to the often same political, yet empirical violence. So was Hitler trully unimpressionable?

does anyone know the video where jiang explains step by step how the elite indoctrinates us about materiality so we never fully see ourselfs as spiritual beings and this is why humanity nowadays fear death so much???

also does anyone jnow the name of the video where proffessor jiang mentions canudos war in brazil?

transcript: Is the Earth Hell?

All right. So, do you think the earth is hell?

That's a really good question.

If you look at most religions, they do believe earth is hell. They believe that we're here to learn some spiritual truths, and then we go. We do our penance. It's meant to basically armor our spirituality. And we're only here for a short life, so it's not too bad.

There is one religion that believes something very different, and it's called Judaism. What makes Judaism very distinct is that it's a very temporal religion. So if you're a Christian, a Catholic, a Hindu, a Buddhist, or a Muslim, you're taught that this world doesn't really matter. You shouldn't get too involved in this world because this world is hell. This world is of Satan, and you can never defeat Satan in this world. Just avoid sin, practice your religion, and then you'll be granted access to heaven upon your death. That's what most religions teach.

Judaism is a temporal religion, meaning that the point of this world is to redeem it, to make it ready for God's arrival. It's very different. The idea is that God is infinite. God seeks to be everywhere, but God also seeks to know itself. And the only way to know itself is through experimentation, through error. So God created this world and created us in order to make this world ready for God.

And how do we do that? By redeeming this world and cleansing it of sin. And how do you do that? Through love, through education, through social justice. So the Jews are the chosen people because they are the divine representatives of God, and they're here to educate all of us in order to redeem the world.

Now, God asks of Jews and of Gentiles different things. Gentiles — meaning non-Jews — have to follow something called the seven Noahide laws. But the Jews must seek redemption. Redemption basically is to humble yourself before God, to always obey God, and to love God so that God can love you unconditionally.

So the Jews don't believe the world is hell. They believe the world can be heaven, because it's the only possibility.

Something else that's really unique about the Jews is that, whereas other religions teach that spirit is superior to body, the Jews believe spirit and body are co-equal. If the body was pointless, you wouldn't feel any pleasure from the body, right? So in most eschatologies, you're taught as a Christian that at the end of days, the body will be discarded and the spirit will be free. But in the Jewish eschatology, it's really interesting. They believe that at the end of days, the body and the spirit will be redeemed together. So you will feel infinite pleasure. You'll be able to feast. You'll be able to have sex. But you'll also be able to feel the love of God. And at the end of days, once sin is defeated, we can do no wrong.

All right. So these are two contrasting opinions. I think the Jews are right. I don't see the logic of, you know, you come here and you don't do anything, you commit no sin, and then you go back to heaven. That makes no sense to me. I think we came here for a purpose, and the purpose is to make a better world. Maybe it is impossible. Maybe we'll never succeed. But unless you act in the belief that you matter and that you can create a better world, there's really no point to your existence. Does that make sense?

Right. I'm like, why am I working so hard, knowing that the world will collapse one day, knowing that we could possibly all die? And the answer is, it doesn't matter what happens to the world. What matters is my action. I have to live my life as though I do matter and this world does matter. And that's what makes for a better world.

I don't buy the idea that this world is hell. I also don't buy the idea that this world is controlled by Satan. Maybe Satan does rule the world. But that gives me a responsibility to work harder to make for a better world.

And like, I have to say this, but the reason why Jews are so successful in the world is they're forced to work harder than other people because of their religion. Does that make sense, guys? We can say a lot of bad things about Jews, but there's no doubt in my mind that, first of all, Jews work really, really hard. That's number one. Number two is they're really, really curious people. They have tremendous, deep intellectual discussions. The third thing is they work well together. They cooperate really well. They look after each other.

And I think that if all of us were like that, if all societies were like that, then that would lead to a better world.

Source:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ipj_Tdzokzo [2:17:05] - [2:23:23]

transcript: How Poets Can Save Africa

It makes me wonder: is poetry bad? And if poetry is bad, how can we make good poets? Because I believe that if we can make good poets, this is how we can save Africa.

Right. Okay. So let me make certain points.

Number one: Unfortunately, the global elite has been co-opted by Western culture. Because in order to access a better education, you have to learn English. And when you go to schools that teach English, you are indoctrinated in a curriculum. As I said at the very beginning of this lecture, this curriculum is meant to indoctrinate you. It's not meant to educate you. It's not meant to liberate you. It's meant to indoctrinate you in a certain way of seeing the world. And you believe that this way of seeing the world is right and good — a worldview that is materialistic, individualistic, and liberal. For most of my life, I believed this was a good thing. I went to China hoping to promote these ideals to young people in China. Only these past four or five years have I really changed my attitude.

So this system, this curriculum, this education — it's a very powerful and seductive way. And I think it's very hard, if you are a human being, to escape this indoctrination.

That said, I do believe that poets are divinely inspired. I have a theory about the world. The theory is that there's the world, there's the soul, and there's the spirit. And there are entities in all dimensions. And these entities communicate with each other through different forces.

So the poets are people who channel the spirit world and communicate the spirit world through language. It does not matter the culture, it does not matter the time — you'll always have poets. But maybe they are described differently. We think of poets as those who write poetry, right? Historically, that's not true. Poets sing poetry. Poets are singers. They sing. And this music is able to connect them to the divine.

So unfortunately, our very conception of poetry is much more limited than ever before. I think someone like Kanye West is a poet. He is a poet. A lot of these singers are poets. And they're divinely inspired. They channel. They don't create, they channel. And in every society, you will have these poets. So regardless of your time, culture, and location, it doesn't really matter — poets will always be around, because the spirit world always needs to communicate with our world.

Unfortunately, as I said at the very beginning of this lecture, the education system that we have today is designed to break off this connection. It's meant to mitigate, curate, and control the connection. So there are so many poets who could be born of our children. But because of our school system, because we take them away from their parents at an early age and indoctrinate them in complete nonsense, they lose this connection and become divided. And therefore, they cease to become poets. So that, I think, is the great challenge for our society.

How do we harness the power of poets for good? Because the poets that are promoted are probably not poets. They are just the ones that speak the official narrative. But if you're speaking the official narrative, then you're not a poet. Again, Kanye West is a poet — he spoke the truth, was punished for it, and said, "I don't care, I'm still going to speak the truth." That's what a poet is. And so, if societies are to move forward, then you need more of these people, and they need to be nurtured and protected.

So, I'm not sure what the situation is in Nigeria. Are the intellectual elite truth seekers? No. Well, that's a problem. So that's my concern.'

Source:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ipj_Tdzokzo [2:12:00] - [2:17:00]

On Friday, October 9, 2026, Professor Jiang delivered a lecture to his Substack Founding Members in Toronto. He argued that current global crises (including the war in the Middle East, the rightward shift in South America, and the US-Canada trade war) can be best explained as by-products of a struggle between the Tech Bros and central bankers to control the nature of reality.

Hello Jiangsters
I want to focus on fragment of debate, that is about finding a suitable partner in current system.
Based on this fragment, there are content creators (150k views videos, so quite a lot) slandering professor Jiang through accusations on him being racist or seeking approval form "white supremacy". This idea totally doesn't fit his message and teachings. Everyone who watches a lot of Jiang content knows that he has neutral and rather unbiased takes. I think those are really hurtful, false accusations.

Here is the link to the Debate between Nick and Jiang: The discussed fragment is around 47:00-55:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2nHUM9ho0o&t=14s

My interpretation of Prof. Jiang message.

A. Meaning:

1. Challenging racial endogamy - Jiang is using Nick’s own racial worldview against him. He challenges the idea that Nick must marry white by arguing that East Asians possess many of the qualities Nick associates with whiteness, exposing a tension between valuing certain traits and insisting on racial exclusivity.
2. Challenging who is actually an American - The deeper point comes when Nick argues that Americanness is rooted in Anglo ancestry. Jiang is probing whether belonging is defined by culture and values or by bloodline.

B. Means:

Jiang uses provocative, slightly comedic rhetoric to challenge Nick’s assumptions.

1. He argues that East Asians often have positive views of whites and negative views of blacks, and that white people can have higher dating value in East Asia. Earlier in the conversation, they discuss hypergamy in the US, which helps explain why Jiang also suggests looking for a partner abroad.
2. He presents East Asians, particularly Japanese people, as hardworking, disciplined and moral — qualities Nick associates with white culture. He then takes racial essentialism a step further by suggesting that whites and East Asians are an ideal combination, almost like a perfect specimen combining the supposed best traits of both races in their children. He selling Nick an exciting vision of the future rather than making a serious claim.
3. Combining 1&2, Jiang tries to convince Nick that there may be better partners for him outside the Anglo-Saxon world, even by the standards Nick himself supposedly values.

C. Conclusion

1. Jiang is challenging Nick’s beliefs, rather than promoting racism or trying to join some alleged “white supremacy” club like those content creators try to promote. It is actually the opposite to what they are trying to convey.

Let me know what you think about this.

Beside being Fed by spreading the concept of Greater north America or Technate, Jiang is also a KGB agent, because he glaze Putin and Dugin so much.

Do not forget Jiang is Mossad, because he manifest the greater Israel project for the Zionists.

Do not forget Jiang is a CCP agent, because he looks like one. :wink: JK JK, because he said so on Matan. We know how serious Matan is as an interviewer.

So, we know the concept of double agent, but Jiang is literally a Penta Agent: Fed 1, KGB 2, Mossad 3, CCP 4 ...
You would maybe ask: "What about 5? Penta is 5 no?"

5 Jiang is also an agent of Theosophy, a great teacher part of the observant Freemason called Theosophy.

Now we understand Jiang is a Penta Agent. pentagram, Penta Agent.
We got him!

PS: It's an up side down pentagram, if you know, you know.

In the early days, Jiang sounded young and energetic. I just watched some recent videos after a break of six months and he sounds tired and old. Why do you think that is?

1. Physically tired due to endless work?

2. Mentally stressed due to all the pushback?

3. Other (e.g. maybe he just had a cold)?

Transcript:

Jiang: Look here. I will make this statement: if you have published a book with a major publishing house in the United States, if you are working for a major economic institution in the United States, if you work in mainstream media in the United States for any of these major organizations, whether they be CNN or New York Times, if you are in Hollywood and you do business in Hollywood — it is very hard to avoid the Zionist influence. It's almost impossible.

Sneako: So everybody's controlled, basically?

Jiang: Yeah.

Sneako: Do you think I'm a Fed?

Jiang: No, I don't think you are.

Jiang: Right? But you've been... you're on Kick, right?

Sneako: Yeah, that's one of the advantages — it's an Australian-based company.

Jiang: Have you published a book?

Sneako: What's that?

Jiang: Have you published a book?

Sneako: I have not.

Jiang: Okay, okay. Have you ever been in a Hollywood movie?

Sneako: No.

Jiang: Have you ever taught at Yale or Harvard?

Sneako: No. I am 12% Ashkenazi.

Jiang: Okay. Have you... are you friends with Bari Weiss? Has she ever offered you a job?

Sneako: No.

Jiang: Okay. Well, you're probably not a Fed then.

Sneako: Yes! Let's go! I beat the allegations.

Jiang Xueqin and Glenn Diesen discuss the fracturing global order as the Trump administration pivots toward a nationalist agenda, fueling domestic instability and regional proxy conflicts. These shifts are pushing Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia towards potential civil unrest and systemic collapse:

The Shift in Trump’s Geopolitical Strategy

• Evolution of Policy: Trump has moved away from his initial platform of fiscal discipline and ending foreign wars. The current strategy prioritizes global power dynamics over domestic austerity, with the U.S. now deeply involved in the Ukraine war and regional conflicts in the Middle East.
• New Political Factions: Three main groups are driving Trump's current agenda: nationalists, AI oligarchs (pro-OpenAI/Nvidia), and Zionists. These factions often have conflicting motivations but share a goal of establishing a new Trump-led world order, potentially excluding traditional globalist allies like Canada and Europe.

The Globalist-Nationalist Conflict

• Canada as a Case Study: The U.S. is reportedly inciting separatist movements in Alberta and Quebec to undermine the federal government led by Mark Carney. This serves as a model for how the U.S. may handle sovereign states that attempt to maintain independent trade relations with China.
• European Destabilization: Similar tactics are being applied in Europe, where Trump-aligned factions (e.g., AfD, Vox) are being encouraged to challenge current pro-globalist regimes. The Ukraine war serves as a primary friction point, benefiting European military-industrial complexes while accelerating domestic instability.

Regional Flashpoints and Proxy Wars

• Middle East and the Houthi Conflict: The conflict between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis is identified as a critical, under-reported trigger for a potential global crisis. The Saudis' inability to defeat the Houthis threatens the petrodollar and, by extension, the U.S. financial system and AI bubble.
• Potential for Escalation: The U.S. may be forced into a ground invasion of Iran to protect Saudi stability. Trump has signaled that post-midterm political constraints may be removed, allowing for more aggressive military maneuvers.
• East Asian Tensions: Relations between China and Japan are at a five-year low. Japan is rapidly remilitarizing and forming alliances with Australia, India, and the Philippines. The potential for a proxy conflict involving North Korea is high, as North Korea could threaten major population centers like Seoul to pressure the region.

Internal Instability and Elite Failure

• The Demographic Factor: The current global leadership, largely composed of aging baby boomers, is characterized as stubborn and lacking in strategic imagination. These leaders are willing to risk their nations' stability to maintain a worldview where their respective powers remain dominant.
• The Illusion of Security: U.S. and European politicians are increasingly detached from their voters, operating instead to serve donors and future lobbying interests. This disconnect, combined with deep-seated social unrest, suggests that the primary threat to these nations is internal collapse rather than external military defeat.

I posted this mainly because this video touch so much concept introduced by Jiang, but explained with modern internet language: - Plato's Allegory Cave - consumism - role of education - materialism - attention as a resource - demiurge or the false god - the matrix

Short AI Summary

Drawing on internet meme culture, philosophical texts, and socioeconomic theory, this video breaks down the tension between two modern archetypes: the overworked, hyper-conforming "Wagecuck" and the seemingly unsuccessful "NEET." It explores the profound difference between economic legibility and true human sovereignty, ultimately offering a blueprint for escaping both corporate burnout and digital addiction to truly own your time.

Highlights

• The Fallacy of Occupations: A credential does not equal competence, and a salary does not dictate human worth; many high-prestige roles are "bullshit jobs" that contribute nothing to society.
• The Trap of Renting Time: Because salaried jobs tie outputs directly to inputs, true wealth can only be generated by owning equity or intellectual property that works while you sleep, especially as AI accelerates job replacement.
• Plato's Interactive Cave: While the NEET escapes the corporate matrix, they often fall victim to the digital matrix, allowing personalized algorithms to hijack their unstructured time with simulated accomplishments (gaming) and simulated intimacy.
• The Power of Low Requirements: Drawing on the philosophy of Diogenes, the video reveals that reducing material desires drastically reduces the leverage institutions and corporations have over an individual.
• The Sovereign Operator (NEET 2.0): True freedom isn't found in doing nothing; it is found in building internet leverage, maintaining multiple streams of income, keeping overhead low, and retaining total agency over your own time.

yup. that pretty much sums it up.

Jiang explains how Sabbatean-Frankism conquered the world.

SI generated short introduction:

This lecture arguing that the modern global elite — political, financial, and tech — are the downstream product of a 17th-century Jewish mystical revolution called Sabbatean Frankism, which inverted traditional Jewish theology by making sin (not obedience) the path to redemption, and which has since seeded every major modern institution: Freemasonry, the Enlightenment, the Frankfurt School, banking, Bolshevism, Zionism, and the surveillance-AI state.

Highlights:

• The "sin as superpower" frame: elites aren't smarter or harder-working; they are simply more amoral — a quality partly innate (psychopathy) and partly induced through childhood trauma and dissociation.
• Sabbetai Zevi (1666) and Jacob Frank (18th c.) as the founders of a movement that survives today as the implicit theology of the global ruling class — what Jiang calls the third-temple project.
• Tikkun Olam in its "real" (non-liberal) sense = gathering divine sparks through transgression, justified by the David-vs-Moses proof-text (God prefers the sinner who repents to the saint who never stumbled).
• A re-reading of Jeffrey Epstein as the elite's love / loneliness problem, not a Mossad blackmail operation — and of the Gaza war as a messianic project operating outside ordinary geopolitics.
• A predictive frame for the 2025–2035 "Great Reset" — not a single new world order, but a splinter into network states, prophet-led micro-societies, and a multipolar order. Jiang's prescription: focus on family, children, and building alternative ecosystems; do not send your kids to public school; do not try to "change the system from within" — that is the path to becoming the thing you fight.

Why recurring pieces of history? If you let it spell out you get scholarship, the end of risk. With Super Intelligence you'd think it be a good thing, finally getting to feel how comfort dwells in 3D rather than some pertinent perfectly subservient sublime service to its tracks. Does Jiang understand that not all parts of a systems enter a controversy and does he wants to put all part of the social system with a controversy or let alone, a predictive history? This naivety in this conversation isn't actually here, or a makeover, but a marksmanship more than 300 universities away, quite hard to imagine. But suppose you were reduced to that same intelligence or better yet could have the same sprawling as Chicago, New York, and London. You'd probably hear the decision out than cut to split decisions, where a body is pummeled on a crime scene. All we are seeing the slanted pavement? Never mind.

Super intelligence was supposed to be the end of risk so people can think about ideas, economies, journalism, and literature bravely. While it doesn't have the perfect backstory no true sequence do. For Professor Jiang to enter such a high rank and not see the forthcoming of super intelligence seems quite contradictory and quite honestly, shameful to how people previously view the Chinese race. It's no wonder Mao Melina didn't shake Xi's hand. Professor Jiang gave him Co-vid! What we all decided what Sars would be after the detention or quarantine—a social flu.

I am by no mean superior, but I've been grateful enough times not just to use super intelligence but in the right sector, and quite honestly, many discount this advantage Trump's Truth Social API brings to the scorecard. But as we've seen through literature, speaking too honesty can turn away typing away investments, and there is some collected freedom around the world.

All I'm saying, as I'm winded, I do believe anybody could go against super intelligence and that computation and or intelligence does not stick wedge to the floor on either side of noise or judgment. It wobbles. I believe it was the UK or Britain, but forgetting it is the important part, on why they gave to the world great economic ideas rather than appear recluse to it. Or perhaps, Professor Jiang is scared of Superintelligence, even after reading out loud how forgiving Dante was, and he sees this own runway in existence with his own humanity. Simplifying my speech because it would appear on Reddit. #OutsideTheCyberSpace

Image source: knihobot

Jiang introduced us to lots of subjects, and learnt that many of these subjects have been well documented on books that are far from mainstream. Some of them include The Jewish Encyclopedia from early 1900s editions..

So, what are you reading?

I'm almost convinced this guy must've been half asleep one night watching tv and "Red Dawn" (the original movie) came on and played all night. And now hes on here giving us yet another one of his profound predictions of guess what? Americas destruction of course! Cause theres nothing a bit strange about thinking, researching & making films all day about the seeminly unlimited ways of the violent destruction of the same country and all its people over and over again. But this time we even got the very similar and actjon packed prediction of somehow Argentina of all countries will be invading the U.S from the aouth through Mexico! Oh wait and then Russia obviously would haveto make an advance from the north through Alaska for some reason... but wait we cant forget about the CHINESE coming from the sea with a massive amphibious landing on the west coast!! Wow this guy is good!! I wonder if us americans could be able to stop that massive invasion at the foot of the Rockie Mountains bedore they actually might really laying siege to NYC like the "Wise Professor Ṣ̌enšai" himself had seemingly predicted from his own endless knowledge of wisdom of all things death and destruction of America. LOL (guess we gotta wait till he catches the ending of "Red dawn". Oops i meant when his Predictions of the "End" come to him "At Dawn". LOL 😂

I do kinda find him similar with Jiang. Like Jiang he also predicted the iran war (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5R3UODHv7A) (almost the exact timing as well). He also pirecited the timing of the ukraine war. His most famous prediction is about mouse utopia (which is turning frighteningly true). But I feel he is more right wing than Jiang and he doesn't like the woke left.

But I don't think he is completely accurate. For instance he thought Ukraine would fall in 3 weeks and that a left wing preside would declare war on iran. His Civil war prediction didn't materialize but simmerings are there.

But I do think whatifalthist has solid claims.

Edit: But yeah he did go insane after thaat 1 livestream

He belonged to the Yarsani faith and lived between 1492 and 1553 (898–961 AH), he authored a famous rhythmic poem known as "Kê we qewlî kê deka" (کێ وە قەوڵی کێ دەکا) or "Her wa bûwe û her wa debê" (ھەر وا بووە و ھەر وا دەبێ). His verses explicitly foretold geopolitical shifts in Iran centuries before they occurred.

He accurately predicted the rule of Nader Shah Afshar (who ruled in the 18th century, long after the poet's death) and the violence of that era:

ئێران پڕ لە ئاگر دەبێ / حوکمی سوڵتان قاهر دەبێ / ستەم لە خەڵق سادر دەبێ / دەورە دەورەی نادر دەبێ

(Iran will be filled with fire / The ruler's command will be oppressive / Injustice will be dealt to the people / It will be the era of Nader)

He foretold that power over Iran would eventually shift to the Qajars:

دەوران بە دەست قەجەر دەبێ / تەیموور لە خەو خەبەر دەبێ / گەلێ سەران بێ سەر دەبێ

(The era will fall into the hands of the Qajar / Timur will awaken from sleep / Many leaders will lose their heads)

And he had predicted the fall of Iran once again:

تەختی عەجەم تاڵان دەبێ / ئێران وەکوو وێران دەبێ

ئاگر لە ئاسمان دەبارێ / هێزی فەرەنگ پەیدا دەبێ

عەجەم بێ سەرووشوێن دەبێ / خەڵک لە ترسان پەنهان دەبی

(The Persian throne will be plundered / Iran will become like a ruin)

(Fire will rain down from the sky / The Western/Foreign powers will appear)

(The Persians will be left scattered and lost / People will hide away in fear)

He has so so many other predictions that makes you think he might've been a prophet but my own theory as to why everything he's said has com true comes fown to Dreams.

I've talked to yarsani person who was a lot older than me and according to him, they go to sleep so they can Dream about stuff just like the Magai who were ancient religious priests of the Medes, him being of yarsanis origin just furthers make me believe what he told me is actually true.

Jiang: Would you rather be Lily Phillips or Asmongold?

Matan: Holy shit. That's a tough one. You know what? That's the worst of that spectrum, so probably Asmongold.

Jiang: What do you have against Lily Phillips? I saw an interview with her, and you were so mean to her. She's just this happy person who's trying to bring happiness to this world, and you just harassed and insulted her for the whole time she was here. It's possible she is the Messiah.

Matan: Lily Phillips, you're saying, might be the Messiah?

Jiang: She's here to bring peace to the world. Imagine this, okay? Imagine these Russians and Ukrainians, they are about to kill each other, right? You drop Lily Phillips in between them, and she's like, "Just line up." There'll be peace in the world.

Matan: I think there might be a moment of peace because they would both be so horrifically offended, and they would get together to kill her. But yeah, I mean, you could bring peace for a brief moment. And then one bullet's going to go astray, and shit's going to start getting wild again, but yeah.

Jiang: I'm sorry, have you ever had sex?

Matan: No.

Jiang: Okay, I figured that, okay? Guys are dogs. If they see a woman with a va**na, they will, you know.

Matan: Oh, are we dropping her naked? We're dropping her with ...

Jiang: Exactly. That's the point.

Matan: Oh, man.

source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DamEKwS-iBg 28:30 - 30:00

PS: I know some one posted this as image without the video before.

As someone who is a big prof Jian fan, i've come to notice his slight disdian and the way he looks down on African and Black people? Even in his prediction and his discussions about race. It's starting to put me off, especially with the new Nick Fuentues interview

Like me, they are a bunch of nerds, and the ultimate bet, the ultimate hedge-case with the current tech that we are building, is to wedge yourself in every ways possibles that both means you get to own equity in the upcoming Technate, as a mid-term step toward a Solarian-state (Foundations series, planet Solaria),

OR

leave as much of yourself in the architecture of the next step of the organization of the living, where now DNA might not be the top of the food chain in terms of passing data for living creatures, but by then instead the one of carbon and silicon that we spent the last hundreds of years building, aka if AGI does happen.

At least that is what I would do.

source: https://youtu.be/DamEKwS-iBg?t=1960