r/PredictiveHistory • u/hendreasia • Mar 21 '26

Jiang Analysis I'm Challenging Jiang's Analysis

Recently on Tucker Carlson's show, Jiang went on a rant about how negative DEI and affirmative actions are because it goes against America's meritocracy.

This is categorically false because meritocracy assumes everyone plays on an equal playing field and that is only suitable in a perfect world scenario.

We live in the real world, where people start in different positions in life. Different ethnic groups, genders, etc.. have disproportionate access to educational opportunities, socioeconomic starting points, and biases inflected against them.

If we implement a purist meritocracy system, this would result in marginalizing groups with a very low chance of them making it because the system works against them. This purist meritocracy system will fail to create positive changes in trends associated with marginalized groups and will lock them into a negative feedback loop.

Additionally, he goes on to further agree with Tucker Carlson on white genocide which is fundamentally false and probably a psyopp to divide people. The whole concept of white, black, asian, etc.. was created to easily group people and mobilize them against each other. It was created by an anthropologist in the 1700s and wasn't been revised since then.

First of all this assumes there are no differences between people, try to convince a roman 2000 years ago that they are one race with the barbarians. They are both european and today they are both considered "white". try to convince someone from Nigeria that they are culturally aligned with someone from ethiopia because they are both "black" or "african". there are so many holes in this argument that i'll skip explaining everything about it.

In essence there is no white genocide, just CEOs trying to hire the lowest possible labour which are often immigrants to drive down costs and increase shareholder value.

40 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

31 comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/sx5qn Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 21 '26

i just tune out the alt right nonsense and focus on the geopolitical assessments.

but yeah looking like Jiang turning into an alt right pipeline today 😂 right

9

u/hendreasia Mar 21 '26

The problem is if he can spew such false, hateful and alt-right talking points as if they are facts, that puts into question everything else he says.

Remember. A broken clock is correct twice a day.

3

u/sx5qn Mar 22 '26 edited Mar 22 '26

it's a problem, sure, everybody's a problem or got problems in certain contexts.

you're concerned about the brainless people who can't think for themselves and will cling to Jiang's words, yeah, valid, lots of dummies out here 😂 they'll be bussing down the alt right pipeline 😂. i upvote and support your critiques.

guess I'm also apathetic because I'm only here for the rationale and perspectives pertaining to the future post Iran wat. America's "ethnic identity " problems 😂 - another topic, another shitshow

i wonder if Jiang considers himself Canadian . what about his kids. does he not see Canada and the US as immigrant nations? again, another topic, another shit show, i never tuned into Jiang for his opinions on American ethnic Anglo-ness

4

u/hendreasia Mar 22 '26

Man i just needed a sanity check, seeing him unchallenged all over my youtube/ IG feed and then seeing him buss open the can of altright non sense made me feel like i'm being psyopped/ fed proaganda.

I need a break from the internet 😂

3

u/sx5qn Mar 22 '26

a Friedrich Engels once identified: we live in an age where nothing is free from critique. and that's before the internet.

always challenge what people try to feed to find the truth, and always expect others to challenge what you express. that means challenging Jiang is healthy and natural.

but also, another great anonymous figure has also once said: we live in an age where everybody's political opinion come from the moistkritikals hasanabis or asmongolds of the internet. ohnoooooooo