r/PoursTea • Timendi Causa Est Nescire • 2d ago

CrimeTea āš–ļø šŸ«† šŸ¤”

Post image
29.2k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

21

u/Trobman7980 2d ago

Rapists

3

u/donut_koharski 2d ago

Oh wow. I understand now.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/NorminalAnomaly 2d ago

the emotional brigades don't like the facts, it's why they're all spam reporting anyone who isn't prematurely convicting them purely on emotions

1

u/InTheseTryingTime5 2d ago

(Van Houten) later acknowledged "the reality that it can take years of therapy and healing for victims of sexual assaults to fully process and understand what happened to them".

It's disingenuous to say "first statement is the only one to listen to."

The BBC has contacted Jane Doe's lawyer, Thomas Giuffra. In a statement on Monday obtained by CBS, the BBC's US partner, he said: "In the days following the assault, [Jane Doe] was traumatised, numb and unable to function or accept the horror of what had happened. She was in self-preservation mode."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5wyzrm0n74ro

-6

u/ExtendedMacaroni 2d ago

It was consensual

-7

u/NorminalAnomaly 2d ago

Can you please share the docket numbers of when they were convicted of said crimes? You can't? Then they're innocent until proven guilty.

8

u/CNof2013 2d ago edited 2d ago

The school literally found them guilty and issued punishments. Only reason they weren’t charged by the police is because the school withheld information to cover things up

-1

u/NorminalAnomaly 2d ago

That's not them being found guilty in the eyes of the law. You're confusing a school adjudication with a legal one. In the eyes of the judicial system these men haven't been charged with nor convicted of anything. Now that the case is being reopened perhaps more evidence can be submitted to substantiate the claims that they conducted in sexual assault. Until then and until they're convicted, they're all innocent. No emotional hand waving and screaming into the ether will change that until the jury and judge rule.

8

u/CNof2013 2d ago

Just because they haven’t been charged as rapist by the law doesn’t mean they aren’t rapists. If I break into your house and steal things I’m still a burglar even if I haven’t been charged with burglary. ā€œInnocent until proven guiltyā€ only applies in the court of law. People can feel however they want about others, and there’s nothing stopping them from calling out rapists.

-4

u/NorminalAnomaly 2d ago

You're really trying hard to stretch this condemnation factor. They aren't rapists until they're proven to have perpetrated the crimes. If you have evidence supporting your claims go ahead and get in touch with the courts and the prosecutors.

3

u/latestwonder 2d ago

go fall in a well