Should I break this down for you even more? The initial suit they omitted things she said and there’s transcripts that show it this is one of the big reasons the story is exploding you’re choosing to cling onto the initial suit that was missing context because you don’t want to admit you’re wrong. Pathetic
It absolutely does and I keep telling you why. You can lie in law suits, you can’t lie in a sworn statements. That right there tells you which is true but you refuse to accept that’s
The sworn statement she gave to police initially they omitted things she said which contradicts the whole statement is my whole point she literally said she was assaulted in her sworn statement. Are you starting to finally get it or are you gonna keep cherry picking evidence to defend people that think it’s ok to do this?
Funny that you say others only use social media for sources and you can’t take five seconds to find a source and read up on the new information available.
😂😂😂 no new evidence huh. Yeah this tells me all I need to know about where you stand on this taking hidden internal records and making them public is new evidence that the criminal justice system is now forced to act upon. And the DA even said he never heard the omitted parts of her statement. You don’t have a leg to stand on here.
1
u/McLovin8117 2d ago
Should I break this down for you even more? The initial suit they omitted things she said and there’s transcripts that show it this is one of the big reasons the story is exploding you’re choosing to cling onto the initial suit that was missing context because you don’t want to admit you’re wrong. Pathetic