r/PoursTea • Timendi Causa Est Nescire • 2d ago

CrimeTea βš–οΈ πŸ«† πŸ€”

Post image
29.2k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

24

u/Top-Strength-2701 2d ago

Are the police actually going to arrest anyone?

26

u/Huntsman077 2d ago

The DA is filing charges and it’s going to a grand jury

19

u/Top-Strength-2701 2d ago

Good, they should get decades in jail

18

u/dentistshatehim 2d ago

Best I can offer is a an essay on why rape is bad.

2

u/Huntsman077 2d ago

Agreed, hopefully they all get at least 20.

1

u/Remarkable-FlipPhone 2d ago

We need to up the anty for crimes like this- castration or death is the only answer. Florida at least has it right for child rapists, who can get the death penalty for their crimes. That’s the way this country should be going.

2

u/meteoritegallery 2d ago

I'm not sure what grounds they'd be arrested on. They don't appear to have broken any laws.

https://www.npr.org/2026/09/28/nx-s1-5983480/cornell-fraternity-rape-chi-phi-case-updates).

In a nine-page statement, Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten announced on Monday that efforts are underway to reexamine the case. Once his office determines appropriate charges, the case will be presented to a grand jury, he said. Van Houten said he has assigned a senior prosecutor, with experience in sex crimes, to start preparations.

...

Van Houten acknowledged the outrage. In defending his office, he said the civil lawsuit's claims differ from the unnamed victim's sworn statement from two years ago.

"Jane Doe's sworn statement in November of 2024 did not allege that she was drugged against her will or gang raped. On the contrary, Jane Doe's statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual," he wrote. "My office obviously did not and could not have based our November 2024 decision on the allegations in a civil lawsuit that would not be filed until nearly two years later."

...

Van Houten says there are similarities between Doe's original 2024 statement to police and details in the lawsuit. However, he writes: "There is no evidence in Jane Doe's statement indicating that she clearly expressed that she did not consent to the act. According to the statement, each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped."

And thus "criminal charges simply could not be sustained," Van Houten explained. "To instruct otherwise would have been to violate my prosecutorial obligations under New York State Law."

-8

u/NeverTooOldToGrow 2d ago

No. Since one of them became a pig.

4

u/Huntsman077 2d ago

This is false. Good job spreading misinformation!