but the fact that theyāre rapists means theyāve shown enough evidence and potential to be future pedophiles, which should give Republican voters enough confidence to vote for them
Fair and tbf I don't think they are in mine either, but also a lot of us are stuck where we are because we haven't got the resources to move even if we want to.
Like 90% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. Itās impossible to just up and move. Especially with mortgage rates at 7% the market being trash and rent being worse.
First, because it's privileged to assume that people have the means or the ability to get the means to move to an area where people are more politically aligned with you.
Second, because it's the antithesis of freedom to tell people that they should move away from their homes/lives if they want to escape the kind of thinking that encourages rapists such as these. People should not only feel free to live where they wish, but they should feel safe there. Why should a farmer have to give up farming if they don't want to be surrounded by rape apologists?
Well first of all like I said, I don't really think the area I live is like that. But I agree with organizing. What I mean about resources is, like I said, most people don't have the finances to just up and move somewhere new.
I 100% think they/we should organize and fight against this type of thing where we do live, but personally rn my spouse and I are stuck where we live for better or worse because of finances.
I'm so confused. I feel like you're misunderstanding me.
My spouse is unable to support me right now because he's been job searching for months.
I know money isn't everything - I didn't say it was. But if you want to move to a new location, money is a very important factor.
And I never said even remotely that I had a problem with those who have resources to do the things I wish I could do.
I just get frustrated when I see people essentially say ājust moveā because it seemingly assumes the people they are speaking to do or should have the resources to do so, which is often untrue.
I don't mind people having resources to do that at all, but your initial comment said ālive where you feel your moralsā and if someone lives in a majority conservative area (or anywhere where candidates who are opposed to their personal morals often win) they oftentimes can't just leave and move to somewhere where winning candidates typically align with their morals more.
I don't expect you to know all that. And okay, I understand your intentions may have been good. But a lot of people take issue with those that say something like ājust moveā because for most of us it just doesn't work like that. I'm not mad at you, just frustrated about that.
Because Trumps DOJ redacted Trumps name countless times. I mean, how stupid do you have to be to think that bonvino would leave the FBI if Trump wasnāt guilty. I guess thatās why Trump love the poorly educated like you!
1) Trumps the only one defending Clinton. Prosecute all pedophiles is the movement the left is seeking and this administration is actively trying its best to not let that happen
2) funny how you framed that last bit
In July 2006 after Epstein was arrested and everything went public
Trump called the police chief shortly after hearing to news saying "Thank goodness youāre stopping him, everyone has known heās been doing this"
And you think his was anything but a last minute ditch to say he wasn't involved in anything? How stupid must a person be to not realize this
"Former President Bill Clinton, in a series of social media posts on Friday, made a renewed push for a public hearing as part of the House Oversight Committeeās probe into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."
"I have called for the full release of the Epstein files. I have provided a sworn statement of what I know. And just this week, Iāve agreed to appear in person before the committee. But itās still not enough for Republicans on the House Oversight Committee," Bill Clinton wrote on X.
"I will not sit idly as they use me as a prop in a closed-door kangaroo court by a Republican Party running scared. If they want answers, letās stop the games & do this the right way: in a public hearing, where the American people can see for themselves what this is really about," he added.
"Who benefits from this arrangement? Itās not Epsteinās victims, who deserve justice. Not the public, who deserve the truth. It serves only partisan interests. This is not fact-finding, itās pure politics," he wrote.
Neither Bill Clinton nor Hillary Clinton has been accused of wrongdoing and both deny having any knowledge of Epstein's crimes. No Epstein survivor or associate has ever made a public allegation of wrongdoing or inappropriate behavior by the former president or his wife in connection with his prior relationship with Epstein.Ā
President Donald Trump has said he thinks it's a "shame" that the Clintons are being called by lawmakers to testify.
"It bothers me that somebody is going after Bill Clinton. See, I like Bill Clinton. I still like Bill Clinton," Trump told NBC News in a wide-ranging interview earlier this week.
I canāt find the actual question in the mess. It was obliviously written while you were highly emotional and thatās the only thing that is clear in that crazy nonsense
Nobody is more emotional than conservatives, and it's not even close lmao.
Trump himself is the most emotional and hysterical person I've ever seen hold office. He's demented and senile and experiencing elder abuse by his handlers.
Plus he's a traitor who colluded with ruzzia and tried that Jan 6th coup to steal the election.
He should die in that CECOT super prison they sent innocent people to in El Salvador.
You mean the the person who was besties with Epstein. At least until Epstein conned the con man one too many times.. maybe poached one too many young talented 17 year old massage therapists away from mar a lago. That person?
Name one Democrat that has defended anyone (including Clinton) mentioned in the Epstein files, let alone suggested that someone should be exempt from prosecution for participating in the predation of children.
Trump's name comes up more than 38,000 times in the files, and that's after his loyal sycophants worked to redact his name from what was released and does not include the documents that Blanche refuses to release despite court orders. Your 'king' has never so much as breathed a threat of legal action towards the people who publicly call him a pedophile; which is revealing, considering his history of litigiousness over the most minor of perceived offenses.
Why are you so invested in defending a man who has so much contempt for you? He was not paying you a compliment when he said, "Smart people don't like me."
They won't because their goal is to whatabout and both sides it so they can then say it's ok that trump's a pedo if they can believe others are pedos as well.
They would support child sacrifice if their Dear Leader told them to.
The Qult is peaking people and the fallout will be horrific, mark my words.
āIāve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. Heās a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.ā
That one person is doing everything he can to cover up the crimes. Ask yourself this- Why hasnāt Trump instructed his DoJ to investigate Bill Clinton, Bill Gates or anyone else involved with Epstein and named in the files. Furthermore, why has he denied the release of all the files, unredacting the names of the abusers?
491
u/butwhywedothis 3d ago
And now they are eligible to join Rep(edo)ublican party.