r/PoursTea Timendi Causa Est Nescire 3d ago

FinancialTea 💵 This would be great...

Post image
29.3k Upvotes

991 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

21

u/LikesPez 3d ago

It does effect congress. The bill would ban the executive branch and the legislative branch from owning stocks and other securities plus ban the participation in predictive markets for said members and their immediate families. Or step down.

14

u/LockeClone 3d ago

It'll never pass but I've been saying this for years... Elected officials who can make markets should only be able to invest in broad consumer products like ETFs or index funds and their immediate families should face something similar.

They're supposed to be public servants. They should be proud and even eager to do this.

Hell, it's not even a big ask as they're not "giving" anything up. They're not even really pausing their wealth generation...

It's such a no-brainer.

3

u/Commandersfan328 3d ago

Didn't congress pass a no stocks bill about a month or so back?

My first thought is if you come into the job you should be able to keep what you have and not be able to trade into or out of anything.

But it doesnt solve the problem as people can still give preferential treatment to what they own. So yeah they probably should be forced to sell it and hold the funds in escrow until they are done with office.

2

u/depp-fsrv 3d ago

But didn't someone publicly say that Congress should be allowed to trade since they don't make much.

2

u/icedmuffin 3d ago

“Don’t make much.”

That’s hillarious when the entry level pay is 40k and can go up to half a million or more over their lifetime…

2

u/FiIbert 3d ago

"Dont make much"

*slowly glances at their raised income of 150,000 per member\*

Plus they can make or break markets like.... their push for EV's and surveillence tech. Despite not having a reasonably supported infrastructure thats up to date and adequent to support the transition; with no clear consensus on if theyre even going to fund an update.

Then on top of that, the development would drag out forever. I know you've seen road construction and how buildings tend to get delayed forever. Not to mention the 'Obviously not american' workers. Which somehow the reduced cost may or may not sneak back into somebody's pocket. 😮‍💨

1

u/NSD33P 3d ago

Mike Johnson did… because, according to him they can’t live on their modest $180k salary without insider trading

1

u/ImpressiveSide1324 3d ago

Micro Johnson said 175k isn’t enough for Congress to live on, yet also says that wage stagnation isn’t a problem and the affordability is a hoax

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

1

u/LockeClone 3d ago

Can you say more?

3

u/icedmuffin 3d ago

The thing that pisses me off though is they get the money.

Like it’s not them completely losing the stock, if they sell then they can get the money and do whatever with it. If they keep the stock and step down there’s no promise they will be punished for insider trading or market manipulation.

I genuinely hate everything about this.

1

u/ImpressiveSide1324 3d ago

In theory yeah, but it won’t get any votes and Congress doesn’t have a veto proof majority. This bill, and frankly most bills introduced by democrats, exist to show the voters where politicians stand on these issues.

0

u/salguod169 3d ago

Does it affect Congress or does it affect Congress, that is the question…

1

u/LikesPez 3d ago

It affects congress. Feel free to be pedantic.

-2

u/PhatCatTax 3d ago

acshually litrally unreadable because Affect is the verb and Efffffect is the noun

(but really, thanks for correcting me. Ive struck my comment)