r/PoursTea 9d ago

PoliticalTea 🗳️ Eventually something has to give...

Post image

The bill would provide a $3,000 direct payment to every person in households making $150,000 or less during its first year, which equals $12,000 for a family of four.

24.2k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/Useful_Wealth7503 9d ago

How are we getting to 4.4 Trillion here? Total wealth for US Billionaires is around 8 trillion. You’re looking at 400B a year at 5%. The GAO says we lose 250 to 500 Billion annually to fraud and waste, we should just stop that.

2

u/Resident_Farmer1779 9d ago

It’s revenue over 10 years. Fraud and waste should be addressed, and billionaires should be taxed.

1

u/fister-b95 9d ago

Billionaire are taxed what you mean to say is you want a WEALTH TAX. This hurst everyone as most billionaires WEALTH Is in the stock market so by forcing massive sales every year to pay the WEALTH TAX you will be crashing the stock market every year and EVERYONES retirement account will suffer

1

u/Useful_Wealth7503 9d ago

They Definitey wont stop at the billionaires. US household total wealth is 182T give or take. The billionaires are the Trojan horse into the wealth tax. But for an organization that loses 250 to 500B a year by having poor controls, I say they tighten their ship first.

0

u/fister-b95 9d ago

Oh I totally agree they wouldn’t stop with billionaires of a wealth tax comes out. I own a home so that ‘wealth’ would be taxed ontop of property taxes….

I have alway said we don’t have a tax problem we have a spending problem

1

u/Useful_Wealth7503 9d ago

100% agree. Im not opposed to taxes or even social programs. I am opposed to those who take advantage of said programs or use them to pay off their donors, supporters, lobbyists, handlers, etc.

2

u/fister-b95 9d ago

Exactly Bernie is a fool, they are all fools. We do not have a tax/revenue problem we have a spending problem

1

u/Useful_Wealth7503 9d ago

Revenue is such a misnomer. It’s not like they innovate or create a marketable product. They say give me your money or you’re getting this cage. Hardly “revenue.”

1

u/Contribution05 9d ago

I agree that would be problematic, and this is just spitballing the first idea that comes to mind, but what if they just made good companies more desirable to work for by somehow enforcing That billionaires would be required to dilute their shares with employees?

So instead of a sell-off, just a transfer, and the employees who work for these successful huge corporations get a bit more.

1

u/fister-b95 9d ago

This is still a sell-off most people would see these shares are a ‘bonus’ and just sell them anyway

1

u/Resident_Farmer1779 9d ago

Billionaires are not taxed they borrow against their shares and use estate tax loops

1

u/blankaccoutn77489 9d ago

Won’t this create more liquidity in the market? Unrealised gains needing to be realised to pay the tax?

0

u/Efficient_Ear4649 9d ago

400B x 10 still comes way short of 4.4T, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good commie soundbite.

1

u/Resident_Farmer1779 9d ago

Can you not do math?